RTG and RTP - the official word

OK so casinos with settings at 97.5% should be accredited, 95% good to go and those at 91.5% should be stuck with warnings eg proceed with care/caution:D.


Personally Chuchu59 I think those settings did exist at one time. Based on my past experiences playing online and millions and millions of hands played over a decade, (which included some of my biggest recorded winning sessions ever); I noticed around 2005/2007 things began getting a little tighter.

Sessions were getting shorter and big wins were reduced. This could have been a result of the online audience getting thinned out by so many new online casinos entering the market, and forcing the casinos to reduce RTP settings to compensate.

I also believe that after the UIGEA was passed further stress was applied to online casinos, with many losing a big part of their income.

Although unknowing to me that some rogue tactics existed all along, I believe from 2008 to the present, many more casinos signed on to the rogue tactic strategy in one form or another, and were forced to attack their RTP settings for the sake of survival.

I think presently their are to many online casinos presently existing for a watered down market. Rogue bonuses, T&C's, RTP's, payouts, delay tactics, document excuses, and many more tactics are being implied today simply to survive.

Online casinos have no way presently to prove their straight up. We have no way of proving their not. (except isolated blatant fraud)

I think when real regulation comes into play, the online casinos will thin out and a select few of big players will remain.

Until then players presently that still play online must except to gamble on the gamble, have lots of faith, and trust your fellow man...
 
I’ve been gambling my entire adult life and consider myself an extremely experienced well informed professional gambler.

Although only playing online for a decade, I also consider myself a well informed professional online gambler. I’ve probably spent more time gambling online in a decade then all the time I spent in land casinos throughout my life combined.

What follows is then, that he is probably an even more extremely experienced and well informed professional online gambler.

How can a casino return 95% to player and give comps and freebies, pay affiliates, give RTG a cut and pay overhead plus account for losses from fraud and chargebacks? The numbers don't add up to me.

Because of people, with extreme gambling experience, like 4 of a kind.

Serious online gamblers that lost hundreds of thousands of dollars over the past decade, and had fun doing it ...

Given the experience & professionalism, the losses didn't hit millions, but was it really fun?

I don’t even want to get into all the rogue tactics being employed today since my may concern is cheating RTP’s.

Personally Chuchu59 I think those settings did exist at one time. Based on my past experiences playing online and millions and millions of hands played over a decade, (which included some of my biggest recorded winning sessions ever); I noticed around 2005/2007 things began getting a little tighter...

Obviously not. So the quest begins ....

Where are all these alleged experienced veterans when someone is challenging them? Where are all the reps that should be jumping in to defend their casinos proving other wise? I’ll tell you where, their hiding in cyberspace waiting for the smoke to clear, because they have no defense against fact.

Which isn't actually possible, because:

Please don’t even mention Technical Systems Testing labs certificates as evidence of fair core RNG’s. Soon, I hope I will be able to expose their actual testing methods.

Sometimes I wonder based on 100% of your posts here Nifty29, if your presence at this forum is nothing more then a hired shill in disguise to support online gaming rogue tactics in present use.

I think I responded several times with irrefutable arguments.

and so on ...

Why don't anyone care???

..., because despite receiving year after year lessons about house edge and variance, the individuals with extreme gambling experience, almost always choose to ignore them and continue to play anyway.

(intermingled with quotes from another forum)
 
What follows is then, that he is probably an even more extremely experienced and well informed professional online gambler.



Because of people, with extreme gambling experience, like 4 of a kind.



Given the experience & professionalism, the losses didn't hit millions, but was it really fun?





Obviously not. So the quest begins ....



Which isn't actually possible, because:







and so on ...



..., because despite receiving year after year lessons about house edge and variance, the individuals with extreme gambling experience, almost always choose to ignore them and continue to play anyway.

(intermingled with quotes from another forum)




....and your starting address is?????
 
Not really a comment on thread just wanted to say glad to see you stuck around 4ofakind, I like your determination to get all the info:).

Also wanted to say, regarding the banned person here and another who was banned in the BingoT spamming post...
Is it wrong that I somewhat enjoy the comments under the user name in reference to why banned? Ass clowns, no real life, etc.
LOL it almost makes me want to get a ban to see what the description would be!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Meister Ratings

Back
Top