4 of a kind
Repeated violations of forum rule 1.16 - troll
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2009
- Location
- New York
OK so casinos with settings at 97.5% should be accredited, 95% good to go and those at 91.5% should be stuck with warnings eg proceed with care/caution.
Personally Chuchu59 I think those settings did exist at one time. Based on my past experiences playing online and millions and millions of hands played over a decade, (which included some of my biggest recorded winning sessions ever); I noticed around 2005/2007 things began getting a little tighter.
Sessions were getting shorter and big wins were reduced. This could have been a result of the online audience getting thinned out by so many new online casinos entering the market, and forcing the casinos to reduce RTP settings to compensate.
I also believe that after the UIGEA was passed further stress was applied to online casinos, with many losing a big part of their income.
Although unknowing to me that some rogue tactics existed all along, I believe from 2008 to the present, many more casinos signed on to the rogue tactic strategy in one form or another, and were forced to attack their RTP settings for the sake of survival.
I think presently their are to many online casinos presently existing for a watered down market. Rogue bonuses, T&C's, RTP's, payouts, delay tactics, document excuses, and many more tactics are being implied today simply to survive.
Online casinos have no way presently to prove their straight up. We have no way of proving their not. (except isolated blatant fraud)
I think when real regulation comes into play, the online casinos will thin out and a select few of big players will remain.
Until then players presently that still play online must except to gamble on the gamble, have lots of faith, and trust your fellow man...