Royal Dutch Casino

[caruso]

Excellent work on the part of Jetset and Bryan. All for $2700 - how ridiculous. It says a lot about the kind of bankroll these clip-joints operate with.

Jetset's point about the thread views illustrates well the frustration at being able to get the message across to such a limited audience - 5000+ views clearly doesn't do the job, good though it may be for an online gambling forum. What can be done for the remaining 90% of players who, for their own idiot reasons, manage to download software and open accounts but can't do a simple Google search for "online casinos", is a terrible concern for anyone interested in player protection and justice against the criminal element.

Spread the word is about all you can do.

 

[The Dude]

...All for $2700 - how ridiculous. It says a lot about the kind of bankroll these clip-joints operate with...

Exactly, but then they may be underestimating my reach and just blew it off without thinking about it.

Jetset's point about the thread views illustrates well the frustration at being able to get the message across to such a limited audience - 5000+ views clearly doesn't do the job, good though it may be for an online gambling forum. What can be done for the remaining 90% of players who, for their own idiot reasons, manage to download software and open accounts but can't do a simple Google search for "online casinos", is a terrible concern for anyone interested in player protection and justice against the criminal element.

Spread the word is about all you can do.

But do a Google search on "royal dutch casino"

Casinomeister may not reach everyone - but it reaches a good plenty - and many of the "good plenty" are people who either have pull or make decisions concerning the industry.

But influentual as the site may seem, it all boils down to the simple player sitting in front of his/her computer and making a decision with whom he'll/she'll part money with.

You can lead a horse to water...

 

[Vesuvio]

But do a Google search on "royal dutch casino"

Nice work :notworthy Just one apparently defunct ezboard forum letting the side down!

 

[2brnot2b]

Royal Dutch is going GOM LOL Get $75 for voting for them.

Check this out:

Link Removed ( Old/Invalid)

 

[GrandMaster]

Quickest payouts?

 

[caruso]

Oh for f**k's sake.

P4K, you might've known it.

 

[gomag]

GOM Readers Poll

I wanted to thank Bryan for sending me this link.

Let me say that last year was the first year we had a problem with unethical voting. The only reason why I reinstated Brandy Casino was because I did not have anything on the site stating, "GOM has the right to disqualify any site who operates unethically."

However, this year we can and will disqulify any site who operates in a unethical manor. I can also tell everyone that RDC currently does not even have enough votes to be taken seriously.

Now, I can also tell everyone that we know many of the sites incentivise their players to vote on their behalf. Unfortunately we cannot police this and in order to make things fair we provide all sites with an auto fill form to pass along to their players.

As most of you can see the good casinos seem to have no problem attracting votes and their are very few who make a serious run at our awards.

If anyone has any questions, please dont hesitate to contact me at [email protected].

 

[winbig]

.....

 

[caruso]

I think I upset that P4K farmyard whore - she just IP-blocked me, LOL.

People should post their opinions there about P4K knowingly promoting this trash; she's actually putting one over the slot-junkie members of her own forum, which really is pretty vile. She might take on board a concerted effort; on the other hand, she might just bar everyone who exposes her filth. Either way, it wouldn't hurt to give that trash a hard time and maybe squeeze her into a rethink.

 

[GemG7]

danyell32
Registered User
Posts: 4
(3/29/05 8:17 pm)
Reply Re:$75 Vote Promo
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
P4K doesn't care what Casinomeister has to say about any casino. Save your comments if based on casinomeister opinions.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



You actually worded the above sentence incorrectly. It should read something like this:

P4K doesn't care all that much about their members or else we would not be supporting Royal Dutch Casino. Of course there is affiliate money involved here and that's what it's all really about, for me anyway.

If you actually read the thread on CasinoMeister about Royal Dutch you would see the current management was very much involved with not paying a legitimate player his money and did plenty of shady and unethical business practices which are all documented.

Spend your affliate money wisely, that's if you see any to begin with.


I just read this over there I'm sure it won't last but it gave me a chuckle.

 

[2brnot2b]

Just wait until they request a withdrawal (that is if they ever get a chance to win at all) lol

They need to come here and read this whole thread. Some other forums I saw had already dropped Royal Dutch's sponsorship because they are not paying players.

 

[Pinababy69]

I think I upset that P4K farmyard whore - she just IP-blocked me, LOL.

I read your post before it was deleted in record time....most excellent if I may say so Caruso, lmaooo....

People should post their opinions there about P4K knowingly promoting this trash; she's actually putting one over the slot-junkie members of her own forum, which really is pretty vile. She might take on board a concerted effort; on the other hand, she might just bar everyone who exposes her filth. Either way, it wouldn't hurt to give that trash a hard time and maybe squeeze her into a rethink.

I agree with you Caruso, if anyone needs an example of an evil affiliate, it is P4K. And just a little extra tidbit for ya, Pumacat (aka The Wizard of Oddz, lol), pretty much runs P4K now. So I don't think it should come as any surprise that the same guy who is standing behind Casino Rewards (choke, gasp, gag)....would be actively promoting Royal Dutch Casino (sputter, hurl, et al).

They need to come here and read this whole thread. Some other forums I saw had already dropped Royal Dutch's sponsorship because they are not paying players.

Truer words have never been spoken 2B, which is exactly what Caruso was trying to get them to do, but God forbid we allow any of those 7000 plus members to be truly informed as to what's going on in the cyber-gaming world, just make sure they click that banner and submit their info to the people who threatened to report the affected player to Uncle Sam.

One forum I know for sure dropped Royal Dutch is The Winning Streak. They had done quite a bit with them since the "new management" took over, but once all the facts were laid out, they pretty much told them to hit the road, and made a very public statement in that regard. They are one of the few ezboard forums which I still frequent, and I will click one of their banners and open an account under them....primarily because I trust their judgement in who they promote, secondly I know that should i have problems with the casino in question, they will fight for me...and have done so in the past.

This whole Royal Dutch thing just leaves me shaking my head, as does the Integrity (how ironic) Casinos thread. I really try and keep up on this stuff, as I want to open my own site. But I'm afraid that the list of trusted casinos grows smaller each day. As a player, I don't even play anywhere besides Micro anymore, and even some of them seem to be going in the wrong direction. So how can you in good conscience promote a casino that you yourself wouldn't deposit at?

I feel very bad for all players affected in both of these threads, online gaming is supposed to be fun and entertaining, and once in a blue mooon profitable. Where is the enjoyment in being ripped off and threatened? How are you a bonus abuser if you are offered a bonus, take it and fulfill the requirements? I guess I will just stick with my few favs that I have, at least for now I'm safe. Best of luck to all of you in getting your issues resolved, I'm sure that Bryan will do everything he can to get you a positive outcome.

 

[jetset]

Is the redoubtable Christine still the owner at P4K? If so this does not come as a surprise.

Regarding Royal Dutch, this is surely desperate action by a desperate bunch of people, but thanks for the heads up - I've contacted Eric Morris who owns GOM through Bluff Media and directed him to this thread.

 

[The Dude]

Is the redoubtable Christine still the owner at P4K? If so this does not come as a surprise.

Regarding Royal Dutch, this is surely desperate action by a desperate bunch of people, but thanks for the heads up - I've contacted Eric Morris who owns GOM through Bluff Media and directed him to this thread.

Umm...he's already posted here
https://www.casinomeister.com/forums/search

 

[Bullajami]

Casinomeister,

I am a noobie here. Just read your documentation on Royal Dutch in the Rogue Casino section. Just wanted to say, "Thanks for all you do".

Thanks,
Bull

 

[caruso]

"P4K doesn't care what Casinomeister has to say about any casino. Save your comments if based on casinomeister opinions."

That is quite extraordinary. ANYONE'S opinions are worthy of a hearing - even mine, lol. To dismiss out of hand the opinion of a high-profile webmaster, an opinion based on such in-depth knowledge, demonstrates the extent of her absolute corruption.

 

[Pinababy69]

demonstrates the extent of her absolute corruption.

Yep, it speaks volumes. And Jetset, yes Christine is still Headmistress there, when she shows up. But Puma is pretty much running the show.

Anyway, on a final note, awesome job everyone exposing these guys for the lowlifes that they are. You can't force people not to play there or do their vote promo, but at least you can lay out all the facts for all to see.

 

[jetset]

QUOTE You can't force people not to play there or do their vote promo, but at least you can lay out all the facts for all to see.UNQUOTE

And of course we can all remember and bring up the appalling record every time a denizen of Royal Dutch sticks their head up!

 

[Pinababy69]

 

[elaine10]

tooooo funny pinababy....had them at joes for a while, now gone! no loss on getting blocked either.

hope you have a good night and thanks for the laugh all of you.

 

[Pinababy69]

had them at joes for a while,

Is that Payday Joe's? If so, another reputable ezboard forum. But PD Joe's isn't just a forum, they have quite a great gaming site period that I'm pretty sure existed before the forum.....correct me if I'm wrong. In any event, another site that I have no qualms clicking one of their banners and depositing my money, have done so as a matter of fact. Thank God for good sites, and great watchdog sites.

 

[Dutch]

:
Pinababy69 thinks Royal Dutch Casino is a Top Casino, thanks for your support
Here is a copy of her vote

Hello,

My username is Pinababy69, and as per instructions, I am forwarding my three
votes for Royal Dutch from GOM., thanks very
much.

Private

----- Original Message -----
From: "Gambling Online Magazine"
<[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 8:12 PM
Subject: Your GOM Awards Vote


> You have successfully completed the Gambling Online Magazine Reader's
Choice Poll. You vote is important in determining the top sites in the
industry. This email is a verification of your results. Please print it off
for your records.
>
> Your Results:
> [votes]
> Top Casino: Royal Dutch Casino
> Top New Casino: Royal Dutch Casino
> Top Casino Software: Microgaming
> Best Payouts: Casino Grand Bay
> Quickest Payouts: Royal Dutch Casino
> Top Casino Watchdog Site: Casinomeister
> Top Message Board: The Winning Streak
> Best Affiliate Program: Roxy Affiliates
> Top Casino Group: CGB/Bella/Jupiter
> [contact]
> Name: Private
> Email: Private@XXXX
> Address1: Private
> Address2: Private
> City: Toronto
> Postcode: Private
> State: N/A
> Country: Canada
> Newsletter: Yes
> GOM Subscription: No

 

[2brnot2b]

 

[winbig]

:
Pinababy69 thinks Royal Dutch Casino is a Top Casino, thanks for your support
Here is a copy of her vote

Is this supposed to be a joke? You must have a huge set to post this! I can really see the integrity of RD judging by this blatant abuse of (lack of) privacy.

Besides, the people that are voting for RD are either totally clueless as to what's going on (the ones that haven't tried to cash out yet), or just voting to get the free money.

 

[Pinababy69]

Well, well, well. First let me reply to the vote thing. I voted for RDC on March 28th, as I mentioned before my friends at the Streak had these people on board as sponsors, and at that time I had full confidence in them. It was either the 29th or the 30th, that my friend (one of the owners) of the Streak made me aware of her post discontinuing any relationship with Royal Dutch, and directed me to this thread here at Casinomeister. After reading through all pages at that time, I made my original post, whatever date that was. I sure didn't think I needed to "come clean" and say that I had made a huge, uninformed mistake in placing my vote.

As to mistakes Sarah, you have just made a monumental one. This sad post of yours does nothing more than re-affirm my opinion of your casino's lack of ethics. Have you ever heard of the word "privacy" in relation to online gaming? Perhaps I should send you a copy of Webster's. If you think you have made me look bad, or damaged my reputation, you are sadly mistaken. All you have done is proven (written proof, lol) that your casino and the people who run it, are not only desperate, but will sink to the level of bottom feeders. You have no ethics, and are seriously short in the IQ department. You will be hearing more from me, trust me on that.

 

[unicorn40]

So Pinababy69 voted for you... So what? For $75 "free" a LOT of people will.

What percentage do you think will ever deposit after that $75 is gone?

Maybe I'll vote for you, too. After all, that 'Poll' is worthless, as anybody with half a brain knows.

Nice of you to try to 'embarrass' Pinababy69 by posting her information. Shows what a true 'Class Act' Royal Dutch really is...

And this is a 'interesting statement' concerning Royal Dutch Casino... posted by Eric Morris himself...

However, this year we can and will disqulify any site who operates in a unethical manor. I can also tell everyone that RDC currently does not even have enough votes to be taken seriously.

Perhaps GOMAG will add a few new catagorys that you should win 'Hands Down'...

BIGGEST SCUM CASINO

MOST STUPID MANAGEMENT

CASINO MOST LIKELY TO VIOLATE YOUR PRIVACY

I'll vote now.... ROYAL DUTCH CASINO!!!

 

[Pinababy69]

Hey, I just reread my votes. At least I wasn't totally clueless, I voted for Casinomeister for best Watchdog Site, and he didn't even pay me. OMG, I am just shaking my head at the unprofessionalism of these people. Maybe someone could PM me if they have any ideas as to the legality of what the top-notch manager of RDC did here tonight.

 

[2brnot2b]

Gee, I thought it was an April Fool's day joke!

 

[winbig]

Gee, I thought it was an April Fool's day joke!

Me too. Dutch needs to learn to think before they actually post. I think we can put this among the top "oopsie" posts; along with the following:

(Note: isn't it kind of ironic that dutch would post that vote information, but actually said what you'll find in the 2nd paragraph just last month?)

https://www.casinomeister.com/forums/search

Simply banned his handle name, if you block his ip you will block me too.

And

https://www.casinomeister.com/forums/search


Royal Dutch Casino value the relationship we have with our customers and web site visitors, and are committed to responsible information handling practices. We take the privacy of our customers very seriously and want you to feel comfortable whenever you visit our web sites, and use our online services. Although our web sites have unique services and offerings, they share a similar privacy philosophy.

IMPORTANT: Due to the sensitive nature of the information stored on our site, we cannot send any information to an email address that is not registered with the casino account. We take your privacy very seriously. Make sure to keep your email address current.]

 

[winbig]

Hey Pinababay,

Just curious, were you the one that marked all the pertinent information "private" such as address, email address, etc; or was that Dutch? If it was you, kudos. I can just imagine what would happen if you didn't and Dutch posted all of your REAL contact information....

Well, well, well. First let me reply to the vote thing. I voted for RDC on March 28th, as I mentioned before my friends at the Streak had these people on board as sponsors, and at that time I had full confidence in them. It was either the 29th or the 30th, that my friend (one of the owners) of the Streak made me aware of her post discontinuing any relationship with Royal Dutch, and directed me to this thread here at Casinomeister. After reading through all pages at that time, I made my original post, whatever date that was. I sure didn't think I needed to "come clean" and say that I had made a huge, uninformed mistake in placing my vote.

As to mistakes Sarah, you have just made a monumental one. This sad post of yours does nothing more than re-affirm my opinion of your casino's lack of ethics. Have you ever heard of the word "privacy" in relation to online gaming? Perhaps I should send you a copy of Webster's. If you think you have made me look bad, or damaged my reputation, you are sadly mistaken. All you have done is proven (written proof, lol) that your casino and the people who run it, are not only desperate, but will sink to the level of bottom feeders. You have no ethics, and are seriously short in the IQ department. You will be hearing more from me, trust me on that.

 

[Thakid2u]

LMAO...Ok, I just read all 18 pages and Did RDC ever pay the other $1000. Maybe I missed it, (prob as it's almost 1 am ). Not being around this board has killed me. I should have been here about ohhh 5 yrs ago....

You can expect my 4 cents on a daily basis now.....Reading the posts of Bryan and Brian (well more then them) I finally found people like me......I HATE SHIT CASINOS. I have gotten alot of crap around the other boards for simply stating the truth. But know I see I found a good home....

Its great to see people like the ones here. BTW, what's the deal with P4K? maybe a link to fill me in?

 

[swampwitch]

To Royal Dutch.....your lack of ethics knows no bounds.
First...you hire some putz from GamFed with knowledge of a mailing list, and we're all subject to numerous and stupid spam...
Then you decide you're not responsible for the misdeeds of your predecessor...
Then you send an email to a complainent that you are part of Homeland Security....
Then you send Jetset a nasty-ass virus...
Then you have the audacity to to try to get people to vote for you at GOM...
Then you try to make yourself look good by publishing the names of good people who voted for you BEFORE they knew the kind of creeps you are...

You are scum......You are slime....You are ROGUE.

Anyone who from now on pimps your particular type of ROGUE behaviour needs to do a little soul-searching..........These people are scum, and you must decide NOW if affiliating yourself with this ilk is worth your soul.

 

[Pinababy69]

No Winbig, Sarah had enough sense to do that on her own. What I do find odd is that of everyone who posted in this thread, I am the only one who seems to have made it on to their "hit list." Maybe nothing more than my lack of info and lack of luck, lol.

I am waiting by my phone now. I live in Canada, so I don't expect the Office of Homeland Security to be calling me, but maybe the RCMP?? If my luck holds, maybe Dudley Doright himself....

 

[Pinababy69]

Hey Swampy, tell us how you really feel, lol. Thanks.

 

[winbig]

I am waiting by my phone now. I live in Canada, so I don't expect the Office of Homeland Security to be calling me, but maybe the RCMP?? If my luck holds, maybe Dudley Doright himself....

lol, gmta, I was gonna say the same thing if you didn't already. I would say ban Dutch for what she did by posting that vote of yours; but we're having too much fun with it right now :notworthy

 

[Pinababy69]

Yep Winbig, I don't mind a little entertainment at my own expense. Not sure if the intention was to embarrass me or discredit me, but if it was the former, ask anyone who knows me well. She's gonna have to do alot better than that. I've made lots of mistakes re: online gaming, wasn't the first, won't be the last. I don't embarrass that easily.

 

[winbig]

Yep Winbig, I don't mind a little entertainment at my own expense. Not sure if the intention was to embarrass me or discredit me, but if it was the former, ask anyone who knows me well. She's gonna have to do alot better than that. I've made lots of mistakes re: online gaming, wasn't the first, won't be the last. I don't embarrass that easily.

Oh I believe you, and judging by everyone elses comments to her last post, they do too. I think everyone can see RD's true colors by now.

 

[Pinababy69]

Ah well, it is now 2:37 a.m. and I am off to beddy byes, I have some serious gambling to do tomorrow at some reputable casinos. Maybe my buddy will return tonight or tomorrow and provide us all with some more comic relief.

 

[jetset]

ROTFLMAO!

Another masterstroke, eh Royal Dutch?

Truly a bunch of immoral incompetents!

And btw Angelo / Sarah / Paul / Daniel / Phillipe (!!) you still owe that player the last $1 000 on which you welched.

 

[caruso]

What I do find odd is that of everyone who posted in this thread, I am the only one who seems to have made it on to their "hit list."

Presumably because you're the only one aware of the main forums voting for Royal Dutch.

Which goes to show the power of corruption. What an extraordinary tool this "vote buying" scam is. The hard work and unpleasantness evidenced in this thread is a midget on the elepahant's back of an email saying "hey, vote for us for 75 green-backs."

Swampwitch: there is no evidence to support GFed's claim of database theft on the part of Dutch. That is all total hearsay. Why all the various organizations accepted it at face value is a mystery.

 

[GemG7]

Hey Dutch your arms must be real tired from digging that hole deeper and deeper.

Keep posting because it just proves over and over again why you were rogued.

 

[bonustreak]

Sarah all I can say is WTF is wrong with you? Do you think that will improve your status as a good reputable casino manager? This is the most laughable thing I have seen you do, what could you have been thinking? I sure hope you did not post this on the advise of from one of the forums that are promoting the vote. Pina is a good friend of mine and I was sick when I read what you did to her, you do NOT even know what you have gotten into here, Pina is like a dog on a bone when someone pisses her off!! All I can say you deserve everything she will be dishing out to you.

Also I have email and asked for my casino and affiliate accounts to be closed, please respect that and stop the phone calls, emails and ezboxing, the Streak will not do business with you or your casino ever again!! If there is money in my account for the affiliate donate to a charity or something maybe that can help redeem some of your soul you have sold to the devil!!

 

[Pinababy69]

Well, I have just finished going on a reading expedition of EZBoard, how truly hilarious. It now seems that RDC is telling people that their vote promo is expired, don't remember seeing an expiry date originally posted, but I could be wrong on that count. What I am really hoping is that Eric from GOM has withdrawn them, and they went and gave away all that free money for nothing. Karma is a wonderful thing.

Caruso, I do believe you hit the nail on the head, thanks for clarifying that for me, never even thought of it that way. And along that vein, Vixen I also think you may be on to something. I'd ALMOST lay a bet that Sarah had encouragement from her "supporters" to do what she did. No proof whatsoever, strictly gut feelings. Odd goings on indeed, very enlightening reading today. And Caruso, corruption is an understatement I think, lol.

 

[pumacat]

hmmm

Well, I guess I have to post cause I need to clear a few things up if possible.

First of all, i don't run Playin 4 Keeps gamblers board, there is an entire staff there that help out, and Christine is still the owner and has final say on everything. I am just very active on the board and others are less active.



Pinababy69 - Im sorry if your post was deleted or moved, not sure which, but all complaints need to go into the complaint area. Then they are never deleted. Just wanted to let you know what happened. I didnt realize we were enimies and I hope we are not.

As for royal dutch, I am still an affiliate and I too would like to have some issues adressed about the non payment of player. But I will go about it in a different way, and lets just see the results then.

I hope to have good news for everybody very soon so we can all end this thread. Perhaps over time Royal Dutch can become a great casino and get past this.

Puma

 

[Pinababy69]

As for royal dutch, I am still an affiliate and I too would like to have some issues adressed about the non payment of player. But I will go about it in a different way, and lets just see the results then.

Pumacat, regarding the above statement....a few points. First of all, many people from here and elsewhere tried to get this player their money. The casino finally did pay up $1700 of the $2700 owing. I don't know what answer you think they are going to give you except to blow sunshine up your ass. They have already admitted some responsibility for the debt simply by paying him the $1700.

Second, non-payment of monies owing is not the only issue. As an affiliate of this casino, do you condone them having someone call this player and impersonate a federal agent? Do you condone them threatening to report this player to the US Government?

Third, and certainly not least, the actions of the casino manager Sarah last night are reprehensible, and if I were you I would be terrified of promoting a casino that employs these tactics. How can you possibly think that a casino posting private player communications is in any way, shape or form "okay"? There is no justification for these actions, absolutely none. You should be telling the members at your forum about this, and telling them to close their accounts and have their private info deleted. Privacy in online gaming is of utmost importance to any player, and any casino that violates this privacy issue should be run out of business. What is that you think that Sarah could say to you that would make what she did okay by you? I really am interested in hearing your feedback on these issues.

 

[pumacat]

Second, non-payment of monies owing is not the only issue. As an affiliate of this casino, do you condone them having someone call this player and impersonate a federal agent? Do you condone them threatening to report this player to the US Government?

I agree thats harsh, except ive never heard of any proof, so I therfore do not or cannot beive it.

The sunshine up my ass coment is funny, we'll see what I can do that others have not been able to do. No offense.

The members are always allowed to express any concerns they wish about any casino room. But of all the hits p4k gets each day, im confused to why there has never been a complaint about anything under this managment? Actually, correct me if Im wrong, but ive only seen the complaint here. Perhaps ive not looked hard enough.

About posting the info here, I agree maybe posting that was not a great idea, yet I see people posting casino chats everywhere when they are asked not to. So, the casinos can never share a little vote thing that didnt hurt anybody, but we can copy everything they say into a forum or watchdog site?

I have expressed my concerns to sarah at royal dutch just like everybody here. I dont promote non paying casinos, but rest assured im promoting because the issue has promised to me to be resolved very soon.

Royal dutch will make the player happy, and I hope again that casino meister will consider taken them off his rogue list.

Thank you

puma

 

[Pinababy69]

No offense Puma, but you just don't get it. Not to insult you, but I really think that you should read up on how vital player privacy is in relation to online gaming. It is NUMBER ONE, just as important, if not moreso, than payment of players. Private player info, bonuses, deposits, withdrawals, name, d.o.b., address, acct #'s, passwords, and all communications with the casino are to be kept private at all costs.

As for anyone else posting their communication with the casino here, I do believe that Bryan held off on that until the very end, as a very last resort. Have you read what he posted, as far as communication from the casino? You say there is no proof that the casino threatened to call the government? I think you should go to where all the documentation is posted and have yourself another read, cause it is there. Not once, but twice, the casino told Bryan to have the player forward all info to them so that they could report him to the appropriate governing agencies. Not sure how you missed that?

 

[2brnot2b]

The members are always allowed to express any concerns they wish about any casino room. But of all the hits p4k gets each day, im confused to why there has never been a complaint about anything under this managment? Actually, correct me if Im wrong, but ive only seen the complaint here. Perhaps ive not looked hard enough.[/quuote]

It's also posted at Winner Online and if you Google it, you'll find a few places of people posting complaints about RDC.

I think it's very important for forum/site owners to look into the matter when a casino's reputation is being questioned even thought him/herself never heard such complaints from the members. Not a lot of people visit the same forums that we all visit, therefore maybe some don't know when a complaint is filed against a certain casino.

 

[winbig]

I think it's very important for forum/site owners to look into the matter when a casino's reputation is being questioned even thought him/herself never heard such complaints from the members. Not a lot of people visit the same forums that we all visit, therefore maybe some don't know when a complaint is filed against a certain casino.

Well some people are just looking at the bottom line (revenue) they're getting. They could care less about player happieness. If that's the case then why wouldn't they delete any and all negative posts towards a casino they're affil'd at? Seems like a win/win situation for them. A good % of the ones that do win probably won't get their money anyways, so they're making a killing on their affiliate account - they sure won't refund the money of losers

 

[Pinababy69]

the casinos can never share a little vote thing that didnt hurt anybody,

Absolutely, unequivocally no. They broke the cardinal rule, period. If you don't get that, no amount of explaining will ever make you understand.

As for the sunshine up the ass comment, what I meant is that they will tell you whatever they think you want to hear ie. oh by all means we are going to pay that player his remaining $1000. As long as you continue to promote them, they will sugarcoat everything and promise the moon and stars.

Ask Vixen what kind of emails and phone calls she has received from them since telling them she no longer wants to be associated with them in any way. Pure harrassment, and nothing else.

This casino really does take the cake for me, this is a new experience in lowlife.