1. By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies .This website or its third-party tools use cookies, which are necessary to its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy.Find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Dismiss Notice
  3. Follow Casinomeister on Twitter | Facebook | YouTube | Casinomeister.us US Residents Click here! |  Svenska Svenska | 
Dismiss Notice
REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do diddly squat without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view most discussions: you can't make contact with thousands of fellow players, affiliates, casino reps, and all sorts of other riff-raff.

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Casinomeister here!

Roulette: can someone help me analyse this?

Discussion in 'Online Casinos' started by lojo, Oct 8, 2007.

    Oct 8, 2007
  1. lojo

    lojo Banned User - repetitive violations of <a href="ht

    Total bet $500
    The second column and second twelve have $70 on them
    The 'box of 4s' $40
    the double bets $20
    each of the 12 numbers has 10

    So payouts are:

    13 - 930
    14 - 1860
    15 - 930
    16 - 1650
    17 - 3660
    18 - 1650
    19 - 930
    20 - 1860
    21 - 930
    22 - 570
    23 - 780
    24 - 570
    2,5,8,11,26,29,32,35 - 210
    all others - 0

    I was very lucky on this simulation (starting bankroll $1000, same configuration with much smaller wagers) and only a couple of variations, i.e. covered all black in second column and rode black for 70.27% coverage)

    In hundereds and thousands of simulations I haven't been able to determine optimum flat bet size as a percentage of starting bankroll... as in - I am willing to risk ruin, but will stop at a 20% profit -can this be determined?

    If not, I would be happy to know how to figure my over all odds on this scheme.

    I can roughly imagine how to construct the math, but am not wrapping my head around it.

    As far as average ruin vs 120% I'm doing better than 1/5 overall (the only notes I've kept) but if I had a way to construct a model of the odds of some sort maybe it would show it isn't a good idea to go below (arbitrary) 50-70%

    I'll bump this now and then if I don't get any help soon:eek2: it's a long term curiousity of mine. It feels like high variance roulette:D

    Am I overcomplicating it? Is it as simple as I have twent numbers that pay an average of xtimes bet... or do I need to look at each one as a ratio of my entire bet - the return - the odds of hitting it... then meld them somehow to determine :what:
  2. Oct 8, 2007
  3. Swede

    Swede Hell is only a word PABnonaccred PABaccred

    You must register/login in order to see the link. of a wholelottaodds.com ?
    1 person likes this.

Share This Page