1. By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies .This website or its third-party tools use cookies, which are necessary to its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy.Find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Follow Casinomeister on Twitter | Facebook | YouTube | Casinomeister.us US Residents Click here! |  Svenska Svenska | 
Dismiss Notice
REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do diddly squat without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view most discussions: you can't make contact with thousands of fellow players, affiliates, casino reps, and all sorts of other riff-raff.

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Casinomeister here!

[Rogue] Prism Casino scammers

Discussion in 'Online Casinos' started by Scammed, Oct 19, 2009.

    Oct 19, 2009
  1. Scammed

    Scammed Dormant account

    Occupation:
    private
    Location:
    sweden
    Last Saturday i won the Jackpot on a slot-machine..7.2k Dollars..Day after i contacted their Live Chat to see if i could withdraw my money, they told me no..coz i had used coupons to play for...I asked if all my account money (7.6k dollar) was equal to 0...they said -correct...So be warned to play with coupons they send to you..In this case Prism Casino just took all my money and probably laught at me,,,,
     
  2. Oct 19, 2009
  3. mattsgame

    mattsgame Ueber Meister CAG webmeister

    Occupation:
    Web Master
    Location:
    Clown Town

    Stories like this make me so annoyed.....its a shame.

    These guys i have done alot of reading about since starting to play at online casino's and from what i have read they where, are and always will be a rogue casino. Im so glad i came here and other websites to find out this information or i could well have been in the same boat.

    see here.. http://www.casinomeister.com/rogue/index.php they are part of the virtual group.

    what anoys me more after my research is that alot of forums and affiliates will promote alot of these shoddy casino's.


    i hope it doesnt put u off playing at any casino online as there are many fantastic ones out there, as i have come to find out. Thanks to this website and a few of the members own websites :)

    I wish u luck!!

    Matt
     
  4. Oct 20, 2009
  5. Scammed

    Scammed Dormant account

    Occupation:
    private
    Location:
    sweden
    i now play on my old Casino named paf.com..its very good casino and they pay after max 5 days if you withdraw anything..good or bad thing is that they dont send coupons =)
     
  6. Oct 20, 2009
  7. actech

    actech Dormant account

    Occupation:
    freelancer
    Location:
    d
    ? you are kiddin right? 5 days withdrawals are ok??? Better to look here for acredited casinos, they are safe and pay in at least 4 days, some within hours.
    But, guess u are lookin for strange casinos..........
     
  8. Oct 20, 2009
  9. maxd

    maxd Complaints (PAB) Manager Staff Member

    Occupation:
    The PAB Guy
    Location:
    Saltirelandia
  10. Oct 20, 2009
  11. GGW Laurie

    GGW Laurie Dormant account webmeister

    Occupation:
    Self Employed
    Location:
    In the Beautiful South !!
    Im so sorry to hear this, please take this for what its worth, stay clear of PRISM, COOL CAT, PALACE OF CHANCE, CIRRUS and all the rest of those ROGUES, they are only there to rip you off and yes they will laugh at you, all the way to their bank in Costa Rica:mad:...................laurie
     
  12. Oct 20, 2009
  13. Scammed

    Scammed Dormant account

    Occupation:
    private
    Location:
    sweden
    5 days is more then Ok for me, I dont need to withdraw money the same minute I win...and your last sentence is very childish..but U the Man ^^
     
  14. Oct 20, 2009
  15. ergopro

    ergopro Senior Member

    Occupation:
    Webmaster
    Location:
    Gamblers Anonymous
    Paf.com pays in hours, not days...at least to all Finnish bank accounts.
     
  16. Oct 20, 2009
  17. Scammed

    Scammed Dormant account

    Occupation:
    private
    Location:
    sweden
    yes..but i'm not Finnish...so thats why I typed max 5 days.
     
  18. Jan 10, 2010
  19. nisosbar

    nisosbar Ueber Meister PABnonaccred

    Occupation:
    Other
    Location:
    Right here
    OMG, make it stop! I have about a dozen new emails today from that group offering me 300% bonus, "no wagering requirement - no max cashout". Uh-huh. I am so sure. :rolleyes:

    I'm just like, wow, either they are really desperate or else they think we are all stupid. ;)
     
  20. Jan 10, 2010
  21. 1366613

    1366613 Senior Member

    Occupation:
    student
    Location:
    A
    Prism Casino:machinegu, coolcat:machinegu, all the same
     
  22. Jan 10, 2010
  23. vinylweatherman

    vinylweatherman You type well loads CAG MM

    Occupation:
    STILL At Leisure
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    They are getting even worse (didn't think this possible), now they just won't pay merely because you took a bonus, not because you played forbidden games etc.

    This means they will hardly pay anyone, since these casinos give so many bonuses, and even dislike players who insist on playing without one.

    Clearly, there is no need to deposit real money there, since they are out to scam you right from the start.

    It is absolutely APPALLING that RTG could SERIOUSLY dent their ability to do this, yet sit back and take the fees, not caring how badly players are treated.

    A while back, we had Gambling Wages trying to convince us things would change. Well they have, FOR THE WORSE.

    How badly does an operator have to act for RTG to pull their license:confused: (other than fail to pay RTG itself:rolleyes:).
     
  24. Jan 10, 2010
  25. dominique

    dominique Dormant account

    Occupation:
    webmistress
    Location:
    The Boonies
    Scammed, do you remember how you found the casino?
     
  26. Jan 10, 2010
  27. rockycatt

    rockycatt meistercatt CAG MM

    Occupation:
    carpenter
    Location:
    Boston
    they get everyone on there site with bonuses , then this money that they with hold and keep is it money that they get from R T G game jack pots

    because if it is and of course by now they RTG know it, then if this is the case
    then R T G is a rogue software provider because a accessory before the fact is treated as a principle in a court of law
     
  28. Jan 10, 2010
  29. vegetagirl2008

    vegetagirl2008 Mafia Wars Level 472

    Occupation:
    No Job Here..
    Location:
    Brooklyn, New York, United States
    I don't think he would be around now because this thread was started last year in October.
     
    1 person likes this.
  30. Jan 11, 2010
  31. Wildfire7

    Wildfire7 Dormant account

    Occupation:
    Engineering
    Location:
    UK
    As VWM pointed out it is appalling that RTG sit back and allow these kinds of operations to flourish. It is a pity that RTG doesn't vet their would be clients as rigorously as the casinos do with their clients.

    This particular group has become so infamous now, that I honestly believe they couldn't care less anymore, and are now in it to fleece as many punters as possible, dreaming up ever devious ways of avoiding payouts.

    RTG should and does have the power to revoke licences which are not upholding its standards of integrity. Business entrepreneurs who are on the look out to establish new casinos might not be so keen to use their software, if it is affiliated with so many shoddy operations. So preserving the integrity of the software brand must be paramount for RTG.....Is that the case though?

    Also worth mentioning the OP said he won a jackpot using a coupon, if it was a progressive jackpot, many reputable casinos do have a rule in the T&C's that progressives cannot be played using a bonus.

    Mike
     
  32. Jan 11, 2010
  33. vinylweatherman

    vinylweatherman You type well loads CAG MM

    Occupation:
    STILL At Leisure
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    With so many software providers pulling out of the US, there is less choice for operators to move from RTG and keep their US players on board.

    RTG has been around for some time, and is well known among players, even if mostly for the wrong reason. There is nothing wrong with the software, the problem is that RTG will let ANYONE use it if they keep up the payments.

    Reputable RTG operators try to get themselves judged on their own merits, rather than the reputation of the software.

    Previously, the Virtual group would impose max cashout carry over rules. If players deposited without a bonus this time, their winnings would STILL be capped by the max cashout from their most recent bonus. THIS is exactly how mysticjos got screwed by Palace of Fat Chance. She had PREVIOUSLY used some free chips, but the deposit that won the RJ was all her own money, but her $6000+ win was mostly confiscated, and she was offered the derisory sum of her previous max cashout, which was only a couple of hundred dollars.
    The casino tried to argue that depositing without a bonus was "bonus abuse", and that players would deliberately LOSE with huge bonuses, and THEN deposit without one and win big, because the machines were "due" because the player had previously lost. What utter BULLSHIT when it comes to RANDOM games, as this excuse tries to convince players the payouts are somehow balanced by the software to guarantee the long term outcome for the casino, and deliberately losing somehow disturbs this. In effect, they were saying "our software is rigged, so you could deliberately be trying to 'streak' the games on non-bonused deposits after losing big for a while"

    No reputable casino would try this excuse, because their software provider would take fright at the suggestion the software worked like this coming from an operator.

    I believe a similar situation occurred with GaleWind software and Heroes casino. Heroes had a player win big at Blackjack, and tried to deny winnings claiming the player used "patterns" to beat the game. GaleWind was alarmed at this reasoning, and pulled Heroes' licence, and in the end paid the player out of it's own pocket, whilst at the same time publicly refuting this allegation, and assuring players there were no "patterns", and that their Blackjack was both fair and RANDOM.
     

Share This Page