1. By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies .This website or its third-party tools use cookies, which are necessary to its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy.Find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Follow Casinomeister on Twitter | Facebook | YouTube | Casinomeister.us US Residents Click here! |  Svenska Svenska | 
Dismiss Notice
REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do diddly squat without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view most discussions: you can't make contact with thousands of fellow players, affiliates, casino reps, and all sorts of other riff-raff.

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Casinomeister here!

Dismiss Notice

Winner Screenshots July 2018: Most liked Screenshot of the Week

Hiya Guest!, This is the current most Liked Screenshot of this Week:

By KasinoKing.
View more Amazing Screenshots here, 'cast' your vote!!.

Rizk, really? Im stunned !!

Discussion in 'Online Casinos' started by philderby1, Jun 27, 2018.

    Jun 29, 2018
  1. colinsunderland

    colinsunderland Experienced Member MM webmeister

    Occupation:
    affiliate
    Location:
    uk
    I know, so thought I better so as not to disappoint :)

    But seriously, while casinos make things up as they do, there are always going to be problems. For the RG side in the UK, the UKGC should create a clear process for casinos to follow, just like they do in other areas, like KYC procedures, then no one can complain, and the casinos all work to the same set of rules. For AML it's harder as it isn't the UKGC (or any licensing body) who require them to do this, but they could still do a 'best practice' document. The casinos are taking so much stick over this, when it could be pretty much solved by an official statement on what to do and when.
     
  2. Jun 29, 2018
  3. brianmon

    brianmon Meister Member webby mm4

    Occupation:
    self-employed
    Location:
    uk
    Yep BrIan
     
    philderby1 and Tirilej like this.
  4. Jun 30, 2018
  5. vinylweatherman

    vinylweatherman You type well loads CAG MM

    Occupation:
    STILL At Leisure
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Yet it's the very casinos that set the terms of affiliate contracts that are now telling players they must break these terms in order to comply with SOW. This could easily end up in court and blow up in their faces when a judge has to decide whether or not the affiliate term or the SOW rules take precedence. This could, in theory, render the affiliate confidentiality term unenforceable as the affiliate will be expected to break this confidentiality routinely for SOW checks, not just with casinos, but when buying property, operating a bank account, etc.
     
    Jasminebed and Mouche12 like this.
  6. Jun 30, 2018
  7. davidsmith56

    davidsmith56 Senior Member

    Occupation:
    retired-formerly a customs officer
    Location:
    Kent,United Kingdom
    That is precisely the problem in that there does not appear to be a set of rules,merely guidelines which different casinos interpret in different ways.I hold VIP status at one casino where I get generous deposit bonuses and have deposited as much as £4000 in a month and have made withdrawals in excess of that figure.My withdrawals are paid within 24 hours and I have NEVER received any form of a source of wealth request.If the SOW rules were set in stone there is no way in which this could happen.
     

Share This Page