Rival Slots and bonuses

Part 1; No, there is no 'system' to my deposits - I just deposit when I see a fairly decent bonus which does not have crazy WR.

Part 2; That sounds like a loaded question! :rolleyes: No - I've been playing online for 8 years & and affiliate for not quite 3 years - I have not noticed anything different at any casinos.


That's not a unique, but for me it's a very strange opinion; Basically you are saying you think casinos operate like UK fruit machines - random up to a point, but programmed to give wins or dry spells to achieve the final house edge?
To me, controlled = rigged = dishonest.

In my opinion that is a totally bizarre concept. Can you accept the a real physical roulette wheel is not rigged, but still makes 2.7027% profit overall due to the mathematics? If you can accept that, then try to imagine a slot is a giant roulette wheel - it does not have to cheat to win, the mathematics gives it it's long-term house edge, even with totally random spins.
If you can't accept that then maybe you shouldn't play at all online, because if all the casinos are 'controlled' then none of us could win long term, could we?

KK

That is a fair point KK about genuine house edge and it is often used as a counter argument to the "adjusted payout theory"

If we go with your argument we have to believe that a combination or all of the following are true;

1) The Casino is run by honest and ethical people (lack of proper regulation)

2) The Casinos prefer software that they have no control over, rather than being able to adjust payouts to suit their own needs. (Surely there is a software operator that allows Casinos to adjust payout on their slots?)

3) The Casinos are not greedy and would turn down the chance to make an extra few hundred Thousand pounds even if the opportunity existed. (Adjusting to a lower payout even for short periods can make a big impact and is undetectable and unprovable)

4) Casinos self audits and payout claims are genuine (assuming they even give any)

You can make your own arguments as to what needs to be true for the "Adjusted payout theory" to be correct.

There is of course a very easy way to settle this argument Once and for all and that would be for Rival (and any other software supplier) to supply the true odds of winning combinations on their slots.
It would then be very simple to check for, what is referred to in the industry as, Raking periods, "Where a machine deliberately forces a series of losing games by use of any compensation or other controller mechanism." or Enriched periods,"Where the machine deliberately forces winning outcomes over a series of games by use of any compensation or other controller mechanism." (quoted from the UK Gambling Commission site) Any of those seem familiar to your online slot play experience?

The obscure reply I get from Casinos and software suppliers alike when requesting this information is that they won't give this it because they do not want their rivals (no pun intended) to know how their slots work.
Now hang on, I thought they were random and payout was based purely on probability and paytables, the gameplay mechanic is surely self evident. Smoking gun?
I have even shown in past posts how the paytable and probability of outcome are apparently not linked which is very strong evidence to suggest that payout is calculated by other means.

Ultimately if you want to play online, 'you pays your money and takes your chance', but that does not mean punters are not entitled to all the relevant information and probability of outcome along with many other safeguards that would be supplied in a properly regulated industry.

To be fair to the industry and those who do want to stamp out some of the more odorous practises and operations the Online world of gambling and Casinos is not half as bad as it might be due to their efforts.
There are some relatively good Casinos out there but a lot more transparency and honesty on how the games, especially slots, actually operate would be most welcome.

Here is a link to the UK Gambling Commission Machine standards regulations which contains some interesting reading.

Old / Expired Link
 
There is of course a very easy way to settle this argument Once and for all and that would be for Rival (and any other software supplier) to supply the true odds of winning combinations on their slots.

I totally believe online operators' assertion that payout percentages are in the 95% - 98% range. The key is to define 'payout percentage'. I believe it includes loyalty bonuses, freebies, match bonuses, software licensing fees (essentially all casino costs sans profit). Hence the true cashout percentage is somewhere between 50% and 60% IMO.

Just think about it - how can an online casino give a 10% loyalty bonus (and in some cases an additional 10% cashback bonus on losses) plus match bonuses plus freebies and actually pay out 95% of deposits? The numbers do not add up.
 
I totally believe online operators' assertion that payout percentages are in the 95% - 98% range. The key is to define 'payout percentage'. I believe it includes loyalty bonuses, freebies, match bonuses, software licensing fees (essentially all casino costs sans profit). Hence the true cashout percentage is somewhere between 50% and 60% IMO.

Don't they publish those numbers (95%-98% or so) based on individual games such as slots and video poker for example. Then how bonuses and such would apply ?? :rolleyes:
 
on another note , how do you find the time in between your daytime job, to play so many plays , log and put on a database each/every result , and maintain and update a pretty busy website and play golf. . . ? are you human?
:lolup: No, I'm with Vortran!

The real answer is I have a very tolerant wife & spend every spare minute of every day in front of a computer! :eek2: Also, if you look at my monthly results log you will see I only play 3-6 casinos per month, which is not a lot really if I'm averaging about 2hrs play every day. I compile my play logs as I go along - it's how I keep an exact track on how much WR I've completed.

I totally believe online operators' assertion that payout percentages are in the 95% - 98% range. The key is to define 'payout percentage'. I believe it includes loyalty bonuses, freebies, match bonuses, software licensing fees (essentially all casino costs sans profit). Hence the true cashout percentage is somewhere between 50% and 60% IMO.

Just think about it - how can an online casino give a 10% loyalty bonus (and in some cases an additional 10% cashback bonus on losses) plus match bonuses plus freebies and actually pay out 95% of deposits? The numbers do not add up.
No one said casinos pay out 95% of deposits did they? :what:

You deposit $100 and play $1 spins on a 95% slot, on average:-
After 100 spins you have $95 left,
After the next 100 spins you have $90 left,
After the next 100 spins you have $85 left,
After the next 100 spins you have $80 left,
After the next 100 spins you have $75 left,
etc, etc, until your bank is zero.
The return of the slot is still 95%, even though you got a 0% return on your deposit.

KK
 
Last edited:
@KK - you're actually helping to make my point which is to dispell the notion that 95% payout percentage means 95% cashout percentage. I've had the debate here before that theoretically all players could play until bust and casino's cashout percentage would be ZERO. Yet I remember Enzo posting several months ago that the house edge is fixed, like rakeback in poker. That is a casino's annual profit necessarily equals house edge times total deposits less expenses. I'll try to dig up the old thread about house edge.
 
Not to derail the path of the thread, but as an update to my post re: my cashout at Paradise8 (and in fairness to the casino) -- I have received my withdrawal without all the docs/faxback fol-de-rol I fully expected. Thank you P8.

Now back to your regularly scheduled conspiracy theory...
 
Not to derail the path of the thread, but as an update to my post re: my cashout at Paradise8 (and in fairness to the casino) -- I have received my withdrawal without all the docs/faxback fol-de-rol I fully expected. Thank you P8.

Now back to your regularly scheduled conspiracy theory...

Thanks for the update.

Just a thought on the idea of conspiracy theories.

The common man will always accept a believable untruth rather than a unbelievable truth.

History is full of conspiracy theories proved fact by those brave enough to question the status quo and in so doing they drag the fickle and weak into the light.

I am not suggesting I am One such pioneer but rather trying to clarify that conspiracy theories are by nature convoluted as the plots they seek to uncover are often Machiavellian in nature.

The guardians of lies and purveyors of misinformation will always try to ridicule and discredit those who seek to unmask them if they can not challenge the arguments.

That does not mean that all conspiracy theories have some basis of truth or that cranks do not exist it just means we should keep an open mind and question everything, the only danger we face is to become more enlightened but a little less comfortable in our new wider World.

There endeth the Sermon. :p
 
Thanks for the update.

Just a thought on the idea of conspiracy theories.

The common man will always accept a believable untruth rather than a unbelievable truth.

History is full of conspiracy theories proved fact by those brave enough to question the status quo and in so doing they drag the fickle and weak into the light.

I am not suggesting I am One such pioneer but rather trying to clarify that conspiracy theories are by nature convoluted as the plots they seek to uncover are often Machiavellian in nature.

The guardians of lies and purveyors of misinformation will always try to ridicule and discredit those who seek to unmask them if they can not challenge the arguments.

That does not mean that all conspiracy theories have some basis of truth or that cranks do not exist it just means we should keep an open mind and question everything, the only danger we face is to become more enlightened but a little less comfortable in our new wider World.

There endeth the Sermon. :p

Wasn't too long ago, (during the AP mess) that my sig was: Just because I'm paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get me.

My 'back to regularly scheduled....' comment was tongue in cheek and I forgot to put a cute winky icon in.

I'll say this and let it be... The fraud and collusion (using a backdoor in the poker software, documented, proven and admitted) at Absolute and UB has done more to rattle any faith I had in the fairness of online gaming, than anything I've personally experienced playing online.
 
Only rival i cashed out from was sloto and that was when i never used a bonus.
Always found soon as playthrough matched money left boom games died.
So no bonus did well many cashouts and then at the end of the week they send you a sloto ticket for me was anywhere between 10 to 50 with playthrough,
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Meister Ratings

Back
Top