blascocomo
Dormant account
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2005
- Location
- italy
Can you make me a list of casinos where you can play bonus without playing your deposit?
Like willhill...
Like willhill...
Casinos By Status
Popular Filters
By Banking Options
All Games
Popular Bonus Filters
Popular Forums
Forum User Features
Recent Forum Threads
Submit A Complaint (PAB)
PAB Rules and Guidelines
Browse PABs
Popular News Sections
Recent News
blascocomo said:Can you make me a list of casinos where you can play bonus without playing your deposit?
Like willhill...
No!blascocomo said:Can you make me a list of casinos where you can play bonus without playing your deposit?
Like willhill...
KasinoKing said:No!
Take a risk - you might win a biggie!![]()
scrollock said:but after while i got so infuriated with their BJ, that i ended depositing at each casino one month, put the whole bonus on one hand, i dont need to tell anyone here i didnt win any of the hands.
Slotmachine said:OK, you're saying that Crypto BJ is not random, i.e. they are cheating criminals. Let's see the proof. I'm sort of tired seeing this "their BJ/video poker is rigged" crap
KasinoKing said:No!
Take a risk - you might win a biggie!![]()
Slotmachine said:I don't know bout the rogue operators and the less trustworthy software, but I see no reason why a reputable operator (say, 32Red) running reputable software (say, MG
) would cheat me when they have a guaranteed 5% house edge overall?? And jeopardize their whole business and risk being prosecuted??? It's a ridiculous idea.
...extend that thought to Crypto and Intercasino - seems equally ridiculous that they'd cheat.
Let's see some proof on that BJ, oh and run it by the Wizard before you post it here, yeah?
Cheers,
SM
Slotmachine said:That definitely sucks. An incredible hand. Not impossible though, just unlikely. Somone's gotta get it. In another thread I posed the question, if you think MG BJ is rigged, why on Earth keep playing it????
![]()
Cheers
SM
That is a very good definition of what I also think happens at a lot of casinosscrollock said:as regarding the rigged, it all depends on the definition of rigged, say if you went in a casino and were dealt 50 losing hands on the trot and then 50 winnings hand on the trot, quite rightly you would think something is up. however that result is in line with what you would expect house edge wise.
this is the same with these cards online, i have no doubt that overall the game plays to its edge, and if i was ever to collate my results I'm sure i would prove the same thing. This is the common argument of the "online BJ is fair" brigade, so i don't doubt the house edge is what it says it is, however i do dispute that the way they are dealt is truly random.
KasinoKing said:I'm far from a Blackjack expert, but I find it extremely unlikely that the odds of a player 14 getting beaten by a dealer 21, starting from a 7 is really 400,000-1!![]()
I don't see the fact that all the cards are 7's is that significant.
Would you be less pissed-off if you had 10-4 and got beat by 7-8-6?