Rimina49 vs Bob casino
- Thread starter Rimina49
- Start date
danofthewibble
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2018
- Location
- UK
Theory - they wanted the OP on Skype to check his IP with Wireshark. Probably suspected it did not relate to the IP being played from. Just my guess.
Makes sense.
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2014
- Location
- Canada
So I suspect bob casino refunded all this persons deposits then?
If you take someones deposits all the time and then refuse cashouts. That is called freerolling the player...but bob casino is known to be pretty slimy so this isnt surprising. Actually most direx casinos are great its just bob that has some ethical issues. I actually think bob casino should get the boot from direx nv. They give them a bad name. I have heard dozens of complaints and a few from my friends about some pretty terrible tactics.
I get the mistake about the n1 casino thing, I made that mistake before too and so did others. I am surprised n1 casino was allowed to name themselves that. Its like a casino on direx platform naming themselves direxnv casino. Shouldnt be allowed really if they arent under one management.
You really shouldnt have cancelled the PAB though just so you can let loose in here. Because now where are you? No where. If you are allowed to resumbit it ..if Max would allow it, I suggest you do that and then stop posting completely until it's looked at. Max is very thorough and will hold ANY casino accountable if there is wrong doing.
If you take someones deposits all the time and then refuse cashouts. That is called freerolling the player...but bob casino is known to be pretty slimy so this isnt surprising. Actually most direx casinos are great its just bob that has some ethical issues. I actually think bob casino should get the boot from direx nv. They give them a bad name. I have heard dozens of complaints and a few from my friends about some pretty terrible tactics.
I get the mistake about the n1 casino thing, I made that mistake before too and so did others. I am surprised n1 casino was allowed to name themselves that. Its like a casino on direx platform naming themselves direxnv casino. Shouldnt be allowed really if they arent under one management.
You really shouldnt have cancelled the PAB though just so you can let loose in here. Because now where are you? No where. If you are allowed to resumbit it ..if Max would allow it, I suggest you do that and then stop posting completely until it's looked at. Max is very thorough and will hold ANY casino accountable if there is wrong doing.
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2004
- Location
- Saltirelandia
No problem as far as I'm concerned, just a matter of re-opening the cancelled PAB.
All I need is a request from the OP to do so, preferably in the original Ticket so it's part of the PAB record.
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2011
- Location
- United Kingdom
Having read up over at the pogg unfortunately it seems unlikely the outcome here could be any different.
slotter999
Dormant account
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2013
- Location
- UK
I wish someone would finally take the plunge and bring something like this to a court of law so we all could see the facts and evidence.
And I agree with others that the KYC the casino submitted the customer to is absurd.
And I agree with others that the KYC the casino submitted the customer to is absurd.
To Max.
Regarding PAB, I don’t think it suits my interests the best way at the moment. Because all I need is to ask the casino about the reason for being punished and also being named a fraudster. This is all I need and I don’t see any justified reason why both the Pogg and casino representative went silent in this thread. Am I the one who seems dodgy?
Casino could claim that I had multiple accounts. Or used a stolen credit card. Was using a fake ID. Or even violated the bonus rules in some way. Dozens of possibilities. Looks like nothing of these applies to me. Then why I am a fraud?
No personal crusade here. Just a straight question requiring a straight answer. Anyway, this persisting silence is also an answer. Self-explanatory one.
Will not post anything else until there will be a meaningful comment from Bob casino.
Regarding PAB, I don’t think it suits my interests the best way at the moment. Because all I need is to ask the casino about the reason for being punished and also being named a fraudster. This is all I need and I don’t see any justified reason why both the Pogg and casino representative went silent in this thread. Am I the one who seems dodgy?
Casino could claim that I had multiple accounts. Or used a stolen credit card. Was using a fake ID. Or even violated the bonus rules in some way. Dozens of possibilities. Looks like nothing of these applies to me. Then why I am a fraud?
No personal crusade here. Just a straight question requiring a straight answer. Anyway, this persisting silence is also an answer. Self-explanatory one.
Will not post anything else until there will be a meaningful comment from Bob casino.
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2011
- Location
- United Kingdom
The rep Homerbet who looked into his for you stated previously in this thread that he would not comment further and suggested you do a PAB - this means Bob Casino will not comment here I am afraid.
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2011
- Location
- United Kingdom
I would also add that if fraud is suspected and the evidence is provided to whoever -the Pogg or Max etc then they will not be posting it all over the forum for anyone to see. Many unscrupulous people are eager to see how they can commit fraud and hopefully get away with it so it would be bonkers to give examples of these on a public forum where they can get ideas of how to commit such fraud
This way online casinos could justify any confiscation (and also casino fraud). Absolutely ANY. Just imagine a hearing at the court where the final sentence is made but no single detail of the case was given away ‘for the sake of future crimes’ prevention’. An absurd? Absolutely.
By the way, not Pogg and not Homerbert ever claimed that the information regarding my case cannot be disclosed. They only refused to communicate with me (as always, no explanation given).
Taking the case to court? I don’t rule it out. Sometimes, getting a fair treatment is an incentive in itself. At the end, somebody should burst the ‘no disclosure’ myth. I will wait for Bob casino reply for a couple more days and , if not received, will then file a PAB again. If unsuccessful - I will go the legal way. Meanwhile, I will appreciate any legal advise from the users of this forum. You may PM me at this forum. Thank you.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2011
- Location
- United Kingdom
Are you waiting for Bob Casino to reply here ? I really don't think that will happen.
You can dispute the no disclosure myth as you say all you wish but both Pogg and Max will not disclose it if they feel it is detrimental or wrong to do so - we trust them here so if they say they have evidence we accept that. If you cant accept it then that of course is up to you but if you do a PAB you won't necessarily get to see all the stuff you are hoping to see !
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2004
- Location
- Saltirelandia
Please reply to my question in your original Ticket.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Regards,
Max Drayman
Player Arbitration (PAB) Manager, Casinomeister.com
Hello Maxd, do you have any update for me?
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2004
- Location
- Saltirelandia
On 08 November I asked you some important questions in your original PAB Ticket. You still haven't answered those.
So the update is "answer those questions, then we can proceed". I'm waiting for your response and nothing further will be done until I get it.
Regards,
Max Drayman
Player Arbitration (PAB) Manager, Casinomeister.com
Similar threads
