Rusty
Banned User - repetitive flaming
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2006
- Location
- Manchester UK
I did say I would not post but I think if you are going to play online you should be armed with as much knowledge as possible as to how the software is likely to perform.
In my experience accross multiple MG casinos over the Years the returns are around 88-92% some a little higher and some lower, overall a little less than what would be expected.
Following any unlikely winning streak and cashout has followed an equally unlikely losing streak and this is without exception so obviously an unlikely coincidence there.
I have just closed my account with Ladbrokes after experiencing this again and here are my statistics as provided by Ladbrokes for Cashapillar for the last 10 Days though according to my calculations the figures are even worse.
(My overall payout at Ladbrokes is within the expected range, though largely because of one exceptional winning session, this is not the issue)
Total games played: 3806
Total staked: 1,001.06
Total returned: 669.00
I have made 370 in deposits lowrolling in this period and made no cashouts.
I played Cashapillar almost exclusively but other games have similar statistics so according to my calculations about 5000 games and 65% return.
Those figures on their own coming immediately off the back of a good cashout should set alarm bells ringing but when I match it to past experiences with other MG casinos then there is a clear pattern that suggests very strongly the slots are weighted and account history is factored in.
I have almost identical experiences with RTG, a big win followed by Thousands of spins and lots of dconsecutive deposits with below 70% return.
The statistics are there, fact, so I can either put it down to coincidence that my highest run of payouts are followed by lowest run of payouts or I can take a more considered scientific view.
Of course these are my online slot playing experiences and of course you should make any judgment from you own results.
I am just putting this into the collective online conscience so that you are aware of what to look for.
Of course if nobody else (real players please) has had these experiences then my statistics stand alone as a unique and extroadinary example of cultured variance.
My advice is to play low stakes and enjoy it for the good entertainment it can be but be aware in my experience a time of unprecedented abundance will be followed by a time of unprecedented drought.
Takes the edge of it doesn't it?
Good luck all.
In my experience accross multiple MG casinos over the Years the returns are around 88-92% some a little higher and some lower, overall a little less than what would be expected.
Following any unlikely winning streak and cashout has followed an equally unlikely losing streak and this is without exception so obviously an unlikely coincidence there.
I have just closed my account with Ladbrokes after experiencing this again and here are my statistics as provided by Ladbrokes for Cashapillar for the last 10 Days though according to my calculations the figures are even worse.
(My overall payout at Ladbrokes is within the expected range, though largely because of one exceptional winning session, this is not the issue)
Total games played: 3806
Total staked: 1,001.06
Total returned: 669.00
I have made 370 in deposits lowrolling in this period and made no cashouts.
I played Cashapillar almost exclusively but other games have similar statistics so according to my calculations about 5000 games and 65% return.
Those figures on their own coming immediately off the back of a good cashout should set alarm bells ringing but when I match it to past experiences with other MG casinos then there is a clear pattern that suggests very strongly the slots are weighted and account history is factored in.
I have almost identical experiences with RTG, a big win followed by Thousands of spins and lots of dconsecutive deposits with below 70% return.
The statistics are there, fact, so I can either put it down to coincidence that my highest run of payouts are followed by lowest run of payouts or I can take a more considered scientific view.
Of course these are my online slot playing experiences and of course you should make any judgment from you own results.
I am just putting this into the collective online conscience so that you are aware of what to look for.
Of course if nobody else (real players please) has had these experiences then my statistics stand alone as a unique and extroadinary example of cultured variance.
My advice is to play low stakes and enjoy it for the good entertainment it can be but be aware in my experience a time of unprecedented abundance will be followed by a time of unprecedented drought.
Takes the edge of it doesn't it?
Good luck all.