I am a little naive on these matters, so please forgive me if I am missing something obvious.
I am just wondering why Real Time Gaming, which has perhaps the best software available, which is fast, sharp and has some very nice games, is associated with so many frankly shoddy outlets.
It seems to me that this can only be a conscious decision by Real Time Gaming, to accept operators whose standards of probity and business ethics repeatedly fall far short of any honest person's expectation.
Things seem to be so bad, that the assumption is that a RTG casino is not a good place to play unless you have evidence to the contrary - where for say Microgaming or Wagerworks the player is given reassurance by the operator's name, with RTG it's the reverse.
I guess it can only be a conscious business decision to go for the bottom of the barrel, and increase profits by working with a large number of shoddy casinos than fewer more reputable ones. This seriously debases the reputation of their fine software, as well as those of the good guys like Bodog. Their dispute resolution system does little to dispel the image as a player-unfriendly site operated by casinos with more sharp practices than a knife factory.
Again apologies if this a chestnut, but the number of bad or player-unfriendly RTG casinos seems to be far out of proportion to what it should be.
I am just wondering why Real Time Gaming, which has perhaps the best software available, which is fast, sharp and has some very nice games, is associated with so many frankly shoddy outlets.
It seems to me that this can only be a conscious decision by Real Time Gaming, to accept operators whose standards of probity and business ethics repeatedly fall far short of any honest person's expectation.
Things seem to be so bad, that the assumption is that a RTG casino is not a good place to play unless you have evidence to the contrary - where for say Microgaming or Wagerworks the player is given reassurance by the operator's name, with RTG it's the reverse.
I guess it can only be a conscious business decision to go for the bottom of the barrel, and increase profits by working with a large number of shoddy casinos than fewer more reputable ones. This seriously debases the reputation of their fine software, as well as those of the good guys like Bodog. Their dispute resolution system does little to dispel the image as a player-unfriendly site operated by casinos with more sharp practices than a knife factory.
Again apologies if this a chestnut, but the number of bad or player-unfriendly RTG casinos seems to be far out of proportion to what it should be.