1. By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies .This website or its third-party tools use cookies, which are necessary to its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy.Find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Follow Casinomeister on Twitter | Facebook | YouTube | Casinomeister.us US Residents Click here! |  Svenska Svenska | 
Dismiss Notice
REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do diddly squat without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view most discussions: you can't make contact with thousands of fellow players, affiliates, casino reps, and all sorts of other riff-raff.

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Casinomeister here!

Your Input Please Rating casino software companies - help needed

Discussion in 'Online Casinos' started by Casinomeister, Mar 6, 2018.

    Mar 6, 2018
  1. Casinomeister

    Casinomeister Forum Cheermeister Staff Member

    Occupation:
    Homemaker
    Location:
    Bierland
    I am putting the finishing touches on our Casino Software reviews, and I'd like to know what categories you'd like to see listed as being rated. I am looking at a max limit of six categories. This way I can give each casino software a proper numerical review number (much like I do with the casinos). I am looking at the following:

    1. Innovation

    2. Variety of platforms (Slots, Video poker, table games, etc.)

    3. Aesthetics (graphics, appearance, etc.)

    4. Availability (licensing jurisdictions - languages)

    5. Responsiveness to player input

    6. ?

    This is an example that I have in the casino review section. These shields are based on what I have here:
    https://www.casinomeister.com/rating-system-explanation/

    Rating casino software companies - help needed: rating2.PNG,Mar 6, 2018

    What am I missing? I know I did not list fairness - I'm not an auditing company, :p but if there is a way to include this somehow - I am all ears.

    Suggestions???? :D
     
    Last edited: Mar 6, 2018
  2. Mar 6, 2018
  3. dunover

    dunover Unofficial T&C's Editor Staff Member CAG PABnononaccred PABnonaccred PABinit mm3 webmeister

    Occupation:
    International Money Launderer
    Location:
    the bus shelter, opposite GCHQ Benhall
    So to get this straight, due to the fact some casinos only provide slots, some slots+table games and some all of that plus live casinos/sports, we need ratings for say overall appearance/ease of use? Then range of games, innovation (such as VS's foolproofing of slot stakes under bonus?) and possibly offering bent demos etc?
     
  4. Mar 6, 2018
  5. homerbert

    homerbert I-Gaming Industry Representative webby

    Occupation:
    nothing :)
    Location:
    middle of Europe!
    Maybe 6. can be promotional activity? Like Yggdrasil have network tournaments, Play'n'go sometimes do the same, etc?
     
    Casinomeister likes this.
  6. Mar 6, 2018
  7. Red Rake Gaming

    Red Rake Gaming I-Gaming Industry Representative

    Location:
    Spain
    Accessibility? :D

    I mean having a good number of games available for mobile/tablets and not just desktop.

    Or maybe "Mobile friendly", that considers the number of games available for mobile and some other things like possibility of both portrait/landscape modes, interface, etc. just the general experiencie of playing the games on mobile.

    Best regards.
     
    Supababe and Casinomeister like this.
  8. Mar 6, 2018
  9. Casinomeister

    Casinomeister Forum Cheermeister Staff Member

    Occupation:
    Homemaker
    Location:
    Bierland
    Was that rhetorical?? :p Yes, I think that the ratings should indicate which companies produce a full range of games.

    Videoslots is not a software company btw.
     
  10. Mar 6, 2018
  11. dunover

    dunover Unofficial T&C's Editor Staff Member CAG PABnononaccred PABnonaccred PABinit mm3 webmeister

    Occupation:
    International Money Launderer
    Location:
    the bus shelter, opposite GCHQ Benhall
    Ah, I see! Now we're straight, I was reading the proposition slightly differently. :thumbsup:
     
    Casinomeister likes this.
  12. Mar 6, 2018
  13. Casinomeister

    Casinomeister Forum Cheermeister Staff Member

    Occupation:
    Homemaker
    Location:
    Bierland
    I've amended the original post to illustrate this better on what I am doing. :D
     
  14. Mar 6, 2018
  15. asghan

    asghan Experienced Member PABaccred

    Occupation:
    Gambler
    Location:
    Poland
    Maybe transparency? Like informing about RTP.
     
    Casinomeister likes this.
  16. Mar 6, 2018
  17. Supababe

    Supababe Opinions Meister! MM

    Occupation:
    Mum, wife , daughter, pet owner and Primary Teache
    Location:
    Lancashire, UK
    I was going to mention this. Some game companies don’t really set up games for mobile play eg not being able to see your balance or change bet amount because the buttons are off the edge of the screen.
     
    Casinomeister likes this.
  18. Mar 6, 2018
  19. Harry_BKK

    Harry_BKK Senior Member CAG mm1

    Occupation:
    job is OK
    Location:
    Balcony
    Gamification, Easiness to navigate, Multiple-Window Play, Bonuses

    Can't think of anything else right now that was not mentioned in the posts above.
     
  20. Mar 6, 2018
  21. nikantw

    nikantw Ueber Meister MM PABaccred

    Occupation:
    A bit of this and that
    Location:
    EU
    I think it should be 7 because like you and homerbert I was thinking about fair play and tournaments/fs.

    1. About fair play. We could have another rating system just for that. My suggestion is just 2 categories, information (how easy it is for a player to make an informative decision to play) and cost (how much it will cost you to play min bet for an hour). Information is about TRTP and chances for certain events to occur, how easy it is to find this info and if real or fun play is misleading. Cost is about TRTP (I think the TRTP allocated to extremely rare events shouldn't count for this) but quick spin and other features are factors. Although "cost" can only be calculated by game, we could rate the 10 most popular and use an average.

    2. Tournaments/fs. If they offer them, to how many casinos and their quality (prizes, cost, frequency and lag problems).

    I quess we could put the 2nd (Tournaments/fs) under "4. Availability" or "2. Variety of platforms" to keep the total number at 6. :)
     
    Casinomeister likes this.
  22. Mar 6, 2018
  23. dionysus

    dionysus can turn wine into water CAG MM

    Occupation:
    n/a
    Location:
    I'm a Canucklehead
    I like rep responsiveness.
    I Know it's a tricky one - but if a rep wants to flog their games, it should be a 2 way street and they answer pms and Qs too.

    Regions: which countries do you allow and refuse. Some comes down to government allowances, some to what the providers feel like. Probably can be wrapped into jurisdiction/licensing

    Portfolio: Not just whether they have games along with slots, but do they offer a healthy selection of slots or a handful
     
    Nate and Casinomeister like this.
  24. Mar 6, 2018
  25. Casinomeister

    Casinomeister Forum Cheermeister Staff Member

    Occupation:
    Homemaker
    Location:
    Bierland
    Ok - great - I think we are getting somewhere.
     
    nikantw and dionysus like this.

Share This Page