I'll get right to the point. I tried to get this sorted out with their manager in private, but that doesn't appear to be going anywhere. I played at Crystal Palace and received their first deposit bonus, and lost everything, deposit and bonus, $0 in my account.
I deposit again and claim the second deposit. Their terms and conditions say that you can't have any balance in your account when you claim the second bonus, and I remember checking my account balance right before I deposited just to make sure.
SO, I go on to win almost $900 in addition to the bonus I received. And when I try to withdraw, after fulfilling all of their terms, I'm told that ALL of my winnings, and the bonus are being confiscated by the casino, because I had a balance of $60 when I deposited.
On to Montana Disputes we go. I file the dispute, and apparently as soon as the casino made their counterclaim, they closed the case, even though I dispute several facts of their case. They claimed that there was a balance of $60 in my account one week BEFORE I deposited, but AFTER I lost all of my money from the first deposit. They're claiming they have an "auto-cashback" feature, that puts money into your account somehow, even though there's no mention of it on the website, and the money wasn't showing up on my balance (which said "0") when I deposited.
So, there are several compounding problems and arguments which make the casinos claim pretty dubious in my mind:
1. There was no balance in my account when I deposited. I'm willing to assume that this is simply a computer glitch or inadvertant human error until I see evidence otherwise, but there definitely was no money in my account.
2. Even if there was a balance in my account, the terms and conditions at Crystal Palace don't have a clause, like many online casinos, that says something to the effect of "if you violate the terms of this bonus, the bonus amount will be forfeited".
3. Even furthermore, assuming I was ineligible to receive the bonus, there is nothing in their terms about losing winnings if you violate their terms and conditions. So again, even if there was a balance, there's entitling them to confiscate the $900 or so in winnings; they're only entitled to confiscate the bonus money.
Like I said earlier, I hope this can get worked out without any allegations of cheating or lying, but needless to say I am very upset about being denied over $1000 on a minor technicality, which I didn't even violate. And I think Montana Disputes needs to re-think how they gather information and make rulings, because there was absolutely no chance for me to dispute the claims of the casino.
I deposit again and claim the second deposit. Their terms and conditions say that you can't have any balance in your account when you claim the second bonus, and I remember checking my account balance right before I deposited just to make sure.
SO, I go on to win almost $900 in addition to the bonus I received. And when I try to withdraw, after fulfilling all of their terms, I'm told that ALL of my winnings, and the bonus are being confiscated by the casino, because I had a balance of $60 when I deposited.
On to Montana Disputes we go. I file the dispute, and apparently as soon as the casino made their counterclaim, they closed the case, even though I dispute several facts of their case. They claimed that there was a balance of $60 in my account one week BEFORE I deposited, but AFTER I lost all of my money from the first deposit. They're claiming they have an "auto-cashback" feature, that puts money into your account somehow, even though there's no mention of it on the website, and the money wasn't showing up on my balance (which said "0") when I deposited.
So, there are several compounding problems and arguments which make the casinos claim pretty dubious in my mind:
1. There was no balance in my account when I deposited. I'm willing to assume that this is simply a computer glitch or inadvertant human error until I see evidence otherwise, but there definitely was no money in my account.
2. Even if there was a balance in my account, the terms and conditions at Crystal Palace don't have a clause, like many online casinos, that says something to the effect of "if you violate the terms of this bonus, the bonus amount will be forfeited".
3. Even furthermore, assuming I was ineligible to receive the bonus, there is nothing in their terms about losing winnings if you violate their terms and conditions. So again, even if there was a balance, there's entitling them to confiscate the $900 or so in winnings; they're only entitled to confiscate the bonus money.
Like I said earlier, I hope this can get worked out without any allegations of cheating or lying, but needless to say I am very upset about being denied over $1000 on a minor technicality, which I didn't even violate. And I think Montana Disputes needs to re-think how they gather information and make rulings, because there was absolutely no chance for me to dispute the claims of the casino.