The T&Cs are updated now.
Regarding the wagering, every casino has games that contribute different to the wagering.
Our house advantage with the NetEnt games is lower than with other games and therefore their contribution to the wagering requirements is lower.
Regards,
Benji
Prime Partners
So what!
You are dealing with CONSUMERS, keep it simple, else end up looking rather dodgy.
EVERY casino game has a different house edge, but the general practice is to group games into consumer friendly categories, and apply a single weighting to all games in each category. Consumers can understand this, and don't see anything dodgy. Well respected casino operators even ADMIT that the topic of RTP and TRTP is far too confusing for the average punter to understand, and that to prominently display the TRTP figures for each game would do more damage than leaving it out because it would lead to misunderstandings between players and casinos, such as players expecting to receive TRTP no matter how short their session was. Given that players don't understand TRTP, they are not going to understand any attempt to legitimise the common practice of weighting slots down as low as 20% purely based on which software company provided them. It is far easier to accept and understand that it is nothing more complex than an attempt to mislead and even "rip off" the unsuspecting customer, and that the explanation is merely a hastily concocted alibi for a company that got caught. It is far more common to get BS than the truth out of a company when they get caught out doing something that they shouldn't, or that is unbecoming of their image and marketing (such as the recent Subway farce).
What you are REALLY trying to hide is that the "crap slots" are a much LOWER TRTP than players have come to expect by tradition, rather than NetEnt slots having an abnormally high RTP. This is relatively easy to spot now that there are some multi provider sites operating with a UKGC license, which forces them to make available the TRTP of each game somewhere on their website. Some of these "crap slots" are showing up as 90% - 91%, even worse than RTG casino using the "land kiosk only" setting of 91.5%. The NetEnt slots have TRTP figures on a par with Microgaming, 95% or over.
The 35x WR is more than sufficient to cover slots with TRTP in the range 95%, 70x is overkill, and is also misleading given that there are only a small number of NetEnt slots that can be considered to have a high RTP, just as there are a couple of Microgaming slots with an RTP listed in the 98%-99% range.
In effect, you have created a the impression of a casino that offers slots with a 35x Bonus WR, on a par with a single supplier casino, but have in fact produced a casino with a 70x WR through the use of two means. Firstly the use of 90%-91% slots to provide some games at 100% weighting, where the depressed TRTP effectively makes them the equivalent of a regular casino with 95% slots at a 70x WR. Secondly, any slots that have a "normal" TRTP have been given a 50% weight, and in order not to put players off, this has been linked to, rather than shown along with the other terms. Even if it was an accident that the link was published as a "hidden" link, it still means a marketing deception was employed to separate "bad news" from "good news" via the requirement to click through to a separate "bad news page" in order to see it.
When you are offering a single website, the average consumer just sees "a page of slot selections", they don't want to have to worry about figuring out which company or programmer produced the game, who licensed it, etc.
What you now have, in terms perhaps better understood by the consumer, is that "some slots are crap" and "some slots are fun". Hidden away in an invisible link, the "slots that are fun" only count 50%, whereas the "slots that are crap" count 100%. However, you have hidden this away, and have advertised a WR "for slots" of 35x bonus. Since this is what you advertise, this is what a player expects. When they manage to win and are suddenly told that the WR of all the slots they played was really 70x, as far as they are concerned they have been ripped off by a "rogue trader".
Microgaming download casinos don't do this, they have a set WR for slots with actually means what it says, no ifs no buts. It seems that these dodgy practices are favoured by the browser based multi supplier platforms, which tarnishes them all with the same rogue brush.
Just because all this is perfectly legal, it doesn't make it right.
There are quite a few things that are "perfectly legal", and some favour the player, but they are not morally right.