New Slot Announcement Primal by Blueprint - 7776x multiplier in FS!

[dunover]

Yes, this latest incarnation of Megaways will have @ChopleyIOM foaming at the mouth with possible wins of millions x bet yet with a cap of 50,000x bet OR 250k, whichever is reached first.

Sorry for the long video, but this game is mad. I have in fact noticed two wilds on some reels which means the theoretical potential of some free games on 6-scatter triggers could be in excess of 100million x bet. Buuuuuulshit!!!!

EDIT - there can only be 1 wild multiplier each reel in FS so that figure above is wrong, but you can definitely get 50x bet x 7776 = 388,800 x bet for every ONE Mammoth on reel 1 with 5@6x multipliers. So if it were possible to get the full stack of 6 on reel 1, than that's 2,332,800x bet for that combo. You can get at least 3 Mammoth on reel 1 in the base game.

 

[Betreels Casino & Sports]

Why make a game that can pay millions and then cap the max win to 50,000x / 250k...

 

[dunover]

Why make a game that can pay millions and then cap the max win to 50,000x / 250k...

Exactly. It's bollocks.

 

[lotusch]

Why make a game that can pay millions and then cap the max win to 50,000x / 250k...

Exactly my thought.
Blueprint has lost the plot all together.

 

[Betreels Casino & Sports]

Technically (and probably legally) speaking, they need to cap the max bet to £5 (and currency equivalent) if the most you can win is 50,000x.

 

[dunover]

Technically (and probably legally) speaking, they need to cap the max bet to £5 (and currency equivalent) if the most you can win is 50,000x.

I'm not sure there's any rules requesting them to do so, but it would certainly be fair.

Blueprint Gaming are German by the way, so when Volkswagen booted the people responsible for their false emissions and fuel economy software I reckon I know where they went to be re-employed.....

 

[Betreels Casino & Sports]

Lol!

 

[goatwack]

Sorry but this is deception 101, how can something purport to pay out millions of times stake, luring players in on that premise, and yet be capped at 50Kx?? We joke about it but how is this bollocks even legal?

The industry's fast becoming a joke and a parody of itself, and I don't find it funny how companies are at 'piss-take' levels with their claims

 

[steveh35]

Primal-evil or Primal Scream after you have played it.

 

[TheresNoDInBonanza]

@dunover regarding your question as to whether or not you can get two 6x's on the same reel for 6x to the power of 7: the hint is in the pre feature screen you saw (2x or 3x up to 243x). So no it's not possible or it only pays as one 6x.

As to a game like this having a built in max pay (as opposed to per casino) far exceeding the games expected potential I fully agree with you it is scummy behaviour.

 

[thr0b]

All very messy; disappointing, as Blueprint's Megaways slots are often vastly more fun than the BTG ones.

Apart from Millionaire, which is A Bit Shit, natch.

 

[dunover]

@dunover regarding your question as to whether or not you can get two 6x's on the same reel for 6x to the power of 7: the hint is in the pre feature screen you saw (2x or 3x up to 243x). So no it's not possible or it only pays as one 6x.

As to a game like this having a built in max pay (as opposed to per casino) far exceeding the games expected potential I fully agree with you it is scummy behaviour.

Yes, good spot. So obviously in FS the reels will only display one Wild - it has to be that as having 2 in view would effectively offer more than 6x (if they were both 6x and only one 6x counted as you suggested) as the other Wild would act as another 'way facilitator' and effectively offer 7x on the reel.

It also remains to be established if the stacks of Mammoth are still possible on reel 1 in FS - assuming they are then my proposition still stands that you could hit 150xbet x 7776 i.e. over 1.16 million x bet. That's with 3 Mammoth, it may be that 4, 5 or even 6 is on the reel 1.

 

[TheresNoDInBonanza]

Yes, good spot. So obviously in FS the reels will only display one Wild - it has to be that as having 2 in view would effectively offer more than 6x (if they were both 6x and only one 6x counted as you suggested) as the other Wild would act as another 'way facilitator' and effectively offer 7x on the reel.

It also remains to be established if the stacks of Mammoth are still possible on reel 1 in FS - assuming they are then my proposition still stands that you could hit 150xbet x 7776 i.e. over 1.16 million x bet. That's with 3 Mammoth, it may be that 4, 5 or even 6 is on the reel 1.

You'd be pretty happy if you hit that.
On a $0.01 spin.

 

[sapit222]

It looks cool, but they seem to have forgotten the winnings when i played just now..
40Euro gone in 1 minute on 0,4-0,6 spins...

 

[dunover]

It looks cool, but they seem to have forgotten the winnings when i played just now..
40Euro gone in 1 minute on 0,4-0,6 spins...

I told you that in the video - the base game is mostly vile compared to Bonanza's. It became apparent quite quickly to me that this slot is set up differently, more volatile in both base game and feature.

 

[dunover]

You'd be pretty happy if you hit that.
On a $0.01 spin.

You wouldn't, as you'd only get 500 bucks lol....

 

[goatwack]

I love me some volatility in games. Especially when there's a 1-in-3 million chance of me hitting 10,000x.

It's dream slotting

 

[L&L-Jan]

This release was the reason why I stopped working early today

Good start of the session:

 

[kazzi]

Just put 5000kr through this 10/20kr bets and omfg... money just goes poff, managed 2 feature nothing to write about, a single 58x in basegame.

Crazy volatile compared to any other BTG slot tbh.

 

[mariafbb]

had few € left in my VS account and opened the game, got 100x from the first spin.
I will give the slot a proper run another tim,e but not bad for my first spin on it

 

[SpinUk]

How can something deliver a stated return to PLAYER if the wins are artificially cut to those limits? Or would the rtp have taken that into account, which I cannot see how it could.

 

[VismundCygnus]

They definitely would have to include the cap in the RTP calculation @SpinUk. OTherwise they could make >100% RTP game and use caps to get it to 96 or some bullshit. I wonder what the regulation is on operator caps and how it relates to displayed ingame RTP. Anyone know?

Btw on the game; Thanks @dunover for the in-depth review. I would lie if I didn't say this game looks at least somewhat intriguing, but that cap is utter bullshit.
I think another thing that makes this basegame worse than bonanzas is no new symbols cascading in.
So at first glance of the basegame, we got:

• weaker paytable than bonanzas
• less possible ways
• no new symbols cascading in

So even though it's totally possible, i'd be very surprised if this basegame wasnt awful (as bonanzas can be fine but won't get you back in shape after your 1st deposit or so).

 

[myke35]

Reminds me of FOBTs capping your win at 500 & keeping the rest.

Think the game should be designed to only pay out a max of what the player can win.

 

[goatwack]

Yes because if left unchecked we know how this is going to go. The gap between potential payouts and actual payouts is going to widen until it becomes the ultimate Bullshit Chasm, soon it'll be billions of megaways but capped at 1000x.

God I love the future

 

[rostonix]

At least it looks better than other blueprint slots