PriceWaterhouseCoopers

Thanx a lot for everyone, who has supplied me with the info on PWC, specially to Simmo! and jetset. :notworthy You guys are right, I've learned a lot here for just two days and that's only a beginning I hope. So now I better go to play some casino without PWC or with it just to practice. :p
 
I don't recommend you actively AVOID the PriceWaterhouseCooper stamp no more than I recommend you SEEK it. I recommend you DISREGARD it as a selection criterion, and chose others.
 
caruso said:
I don't recommend you actively AVOID the PriceWaterhouseCooper stamp no more than I recommend you SEEK it. I recommend you DISREGARD it as a selection criterion, and chose others.

Snap! :thumbsup:
 
Jetset, i do business with people all my life, Good people, and they steal, lie etc. Money is the root of all evil. Walmart crooks, centruy 21 crooks, well fargo banks crooks. Cause it a big company dont mean they dont lie or steal. They just have not got caught. The thiing about princewaterhouse is they suppose to be letting us know the real about casinos, but deep down if it comes to it would they tell us about any wrong doing they find in any casino that pays them :eek2:
 
"Jetset, i do business with people all my life, Good people, and they steal, lie etc. Money is the root of all evil. Walmart crooks, centruy 21 crooks, well fargo banks crooks. Cause it a big company dont mean they dont lie or steal. They just have not got caught. The thiing about princewaterhouse is they suppose to be letting us know the real about casinos, but deep down if it comes to it would they tell us about any wrong doing they find in any casino that pays them"

I don't buy in to this odd view that every business is crooked, Bethug...and that appears to be where we differ. But in a fair society, some proof for allegations such as these is normally required.

I don't believe you can produce any more evidence than Caruso can that justifies these attacks on the integrity of PwC, or the concluding sentence in your posting here.

All I see are groundless assumptions of the worst sort of professional conduct possible, made by folks who have as far as I know never communicated with the company they are slagging off so recklessly and with apparently scant knowledge of it, its people or its operations.

The sad-ass thing imo is that those responsible are deliberately and apparently maliciously trying to discredit PwC in an attempt to derail an organisation that is already having some success in attempting to improve player service and safety and casino efficiency.
 
caruso said:
I don't recommend you actively AVOID the PriceWaterhouseCooper stamp no more than I recommend you SEEK it. I recommend you DISREGARD it as a selection criterion, and chose others.
Clear, I will not be running from the PWC stamp, but I will not be so 'PWC sensitive', as I thought I should.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Meister Ratings

Back
Top