- Joined
- Sep 6, 2022
- Location
- uk
Evening I’ll try and keep this succinct.
Had a malfunction on Big Bass Bonanza (PP slot) where in bonus round it failed to add 10 of 20 free spins .
Reported immediately and logged for investigation- 60 days later I am sent a url link with a replay on, no details on this (player ID, time, spin ref etc all what’s on your normal slot). Also the wrong game and without any info on this could be any players replay. Categorically told that this url link is my bonus replay and NO OTHER REPLAYS EXIST AT ALL. I was told twice that with absolute certainty this replay was my bonus round, a statement that a VS advisor cannot substantiate given the lack of evidence to support this, their comment back was “our partner has no reason to send us the wrong replay”.
I then discover Pragmatic Replay, a function which was not present, removed or hidden from players. Had this been there it would have proven my issue at a few seconds after the issue. During the 60 days it took to find a url replay no operator (approx 12-15 in that period), videoslot or the game provider made ref to or mentioned this feature, why would this be when they would be well aware?
Only when I mentioned it it was acknowledged, and the next time I log in, as if by magic the features there on that slot showing all history. The PP replays on there show no details as they are linked to account logged in. So again the replay could be anyones round that I was sent. I mean 60 days to obtain something I expected 48 hours maximum, then it to be the wrong game and fault I reported and contain no details was very strange.
Reported to IBAS, the missing replay feature was the further added to case some 4 week after the initial filing, we are now 17 weeks into this and no response from IBAS.
My belief is, and I’ve had nothing to counter this, that the slot malfunctioned and this was picked up by VS. Then followed a 60 day delay to do any work needed before supplying a replay to me. I do not believe the replay is mine, as it was not the game I reported, nor the malfunction reported and no data showing my details or anything related supports it being mine, no metadata provided. The pragmatic replay function had been either been removed or hidden on the slot. Despite VS, Pragmatic Play and their staff being aware of this feature no one mentioned this during the entire investigation. This is a feature made available to support players and providers in these instances. I believe this was knowing disabled and the fact this wasn’t mentioned during the whole investigation says this was done to benefit or protect VS and or PP. the fact that this appeared within a day of reporting this to IBAS adds further to my suspicion it was fine to protect them. I firmly believe that false details were provided misrepresenting a malfunction that went on to pay the player a substantial sum.
If I sent VS a replay of a £50,000 slot win and it had no details on but I stated that this just happened to me, would they simply accept this and pay out? We know the answer.
If this feature had been disabled by them and as part of their “thorough investigation” not referenced this at all then knowingly lied to me as evidently there was another replay available to them, this can only be done for one reason.
Finally at the point the missing feature was mentioned to them they offered to investigate this for me. I politely declined saying they had already carried out a lengthy thorough investigation into this and the feature would have formed part of that, as you have exhausted your internal complaints procedure giving your final answer and referring me to IBAS there is no reason for you to look into anything. This was passed to VS and IBAS very early July so potentially this is the delay in the case.
Any thoughts
See Related Threads: Had a malfunction on Big Bass Bonanza (PP slot) where in bonus round it failed to add 10 of 20 free spins .
Reported immediately and logged for investigation- 60 days later I am sent a url link with a replay on, no details on this (player ID, time, spin ref etc all what’s on your normal slot). Also the wrong game and without any info on this could be any players replay. Categorically told that this url link is my bonus replay and NO OTHER REPLAYS EXIST AT ALL. I was told twice that with absolute certainty this replay was my bonus round, a statement that a VS advisor cannot substantiate given the lack of evidence to support this, their comment back was “our partner has no reason to send us the wrong replay”.
I then discover Pragmatic Replay, a function which was not present, removed or hidden from players. Had this been there it would have proven my issue at a few seconds after the issue. During the 60 days it took to find a url replay no operator (approx 12-15 in that period), videoslot or the game provider made ref to or mentioned this feature, why would this be when they would be well aware?
Only when I mentioned it it was acknowledged, and the next time I log in, as if by magic the features there on that slot showing all history. The PP replays on there show no details as they are linked to account logged in. So again the replay could be anyones round that I was sent. I mean 60 days to obtain something I expected 48 hours maximum, then it to be the wrong game and fault I reported and contain no details was very strange.
Reported to IBAS, the missing replay feature was the further added to case some 4 week after the initial filing, we are now 17 weeks into this and no response from IBAS.
My belief is, and I’ve had nothing to counter this, that the slot malfunctioned and this was picked up by VS. Then followed a 60 day delay to do any work needed before supplying a replay to me. I do not believe the replay is mine, as it was not the game I reported, nor the malfunction reported and no data showing my details or anything related supports it being mine, no metadata provided. The pragmatic replay function had been either been removed or hidden on the slot. Despite VS, Pragmatic Play and their staff being aware of this feature no one mentioned this during the entire investigation. This is a feature made available to support players and providers in these instances. I believe this was knowing disabled and the fact this wasn’t mentioned during the whole investigation says this was done to benefit or protect VS and or PP. the fact that this appeared within a day of reporting this to IBAS adds further to my suspicion it was fine to protect them. I firmly believe that false details were provided misrepresenting a malfunction that went on to pay the player a substantial sum.
If I sent VS a replay of a £50,000 slot win and it had no details on but I stated that this just happened to me, would they simply accept this and pay out? We know the answer.
If this feature had been disabled by them and as part of their “thorough investigation” not referenced this at all then knowingly lied to me as evidently there was another replay available to them, this can only be done for one reason.
Finally at the point the missing feature was mentioned to them they offered to investigate this for me. I politely declined saying they had already carried out a lengthy thorough investigation into this and the feature would have formed part of that, as you have exhausted your internal complaints procedure giving your final answer and referring me to IBAS there is no reason for you to look into anything. This was passed to VS and IBAS very early July so potentially this is the delay in the case.
Any thoughts
Last edited by a moderator: