PR: E.U. Online Gambling Operators File Complaint Against U.S.


Forum Cheermeister
Staff member
Jun 30, 1998
E.U. Online Gambling Operators File Complaint Against U.S. For Discriminatory Practices

U.S. Regulation of Internet Gambling Needed to Resolve Dispute

Washington, D.C. A formal complaint filed today by European online gambling operators for claims of discrimination and violation of international trade law by the United States should encourage U.S. lawmakers to regulate Internet gambling. Legislation introduced by Representative Barney Frank (D-MA), the Internet Gambling Regulation and Enforcement Act, would regulate Internet gambling and resolve the pending action by creating a level playing field among domestic and international operators.

"This complaint complements the current legislative initiatives led by Representative Frank, said Nao Matsukata, formerly Director of Policy Planning for USTR Robert Zoellick and now a Senior Advisor for Alston and Bird LLP. It is consistent with the effort to establish a non discriminatory market in the United States."

The action was filed under a provision of the European Unions Trade Barriers Regulation by the Remote Gambling Association (RGA), which represents the largest remote gambling companies in Europe. RGA asserts that the U.S. Department of Justice is in violation of international trade law by threatening and pressing criminal prosecutions, forfeitures and other enforcement actions against foreign online gaming operators while allowing domestic U.S. online gaming operators, primarily horse betting, to flourish.

We applaud the efforts of the RGA and agree that Congress should take action to end the current discrimination against foreign online gambling operators, said Jeffrey Sandman, spokesperson for the Safe and Secure Internet Gambling Initiative.

The RGA complaint comes in the context of an increasingly contentious trade dispute over online gaming resulting from Antiguas World Trade Organization (WTO) victory over the U.S. earlier this year. After the W.T.O. ruled that the U.S. had violated trade rules in barring Antiguan online gaming operators from the U.S. market, the U.S. withdrew its W.T.O. obligations with regard to free trade in the gambling area. Earlier this week, the European Union and several other countries, including Japan, Canada, and Australia, agreed to accept compensation from the U.S. for the withdrawal of market access. However, the trade concessions do not address charges against the U.S. for discriminatory and protectionist practices against foreign online operators that took place before the withdrawal of the commitment.

"The U.S. decision to pursue the compensation negotiations with these countries was unfortunate, Matsukata said. This filing by the RGA is a welcome development; it is an effort to restore integrity back into the international trading system."

It is unfortunate that the Administration has unilaterally acted to resolve the WTO Internet gambling dispute by continuing to block E.U. operators from accessing the U.S. market, added Sandman. It is time for the U.S. to end its hypocritical practices that discriminate against foreign online gambling operators, while allowing U.S. gambling operators to accept bets for certain forms of gambling. Regulation of Internet gambling should be supported as a means to resolve this trade dispute.

A provision of the E.U.s Trade Barriers Regulation allows any E.U. company or association to complain against obstacles to trade in other countries, which the E.U. must then investigate. After the investigation, the E.U. could pursue discussions with the U.S. to find an appropriate solution to end the discrimination. If the parties cannot settle the matter themselves, the E.U. could bring a case against the U.S. to the WTO on the claims.

About Safe and Secure Internet Gambling Initiative

The Safe and Secure Internet Gambling Initiative promotes the freedom of individuals to gamble online with the proper safeguards to protect consumers and ensure the integrity of financial transactions. For more information on the Initiative, please visit The Web site provides a means by which individuals can register support for regulated Internet gambling with their elected representatives.


Dormant account
Sep 25, 2006
They are doing this now ? 14 months after UIGEA was ratified ? What the hell have their legal teams been doing this entire time ?

Users who are viewing this thread