Player-Webmasters !!..be honest now!

[Lurkio]

OK..there are players here and affiliates here..and there are also affiliates ( webmasters) that play.

How many sign up under their own referrer codes ( or those of colleagues) and claim back 35% of their losses ?

If you are either , or do not do that, what is your opinion of that practice otherwise ?

Lets face it..it would be easy .


( edited for spelling )

 

[dominique]

That would be fun, but you are not allowed to sign up under your own code.

It is considered fraud, and I think if anyone did it, they would not last long as an affiliate.

 

[slotchik]

I'm sure people get away with it. It's NOT fraud though. If you're losing the money, the casino is making the money.

 

[Lurkio]

That would be fun, but you are not allowed to sign up under your own code.

It is considered fraud, and I think if anyone did it, they would not last long as an affiliate.

It would be easy.. thats why I wrote..( or those of colleagues)

 

[sirius]

Referback used to allow it but they later changed their terms.

 

[eek]

Or a referral ring.

A signs up with B who signs up with C etc as a group, like the MIT blackjack group in vegas in the 90's.

On something like VP you have 0.5% HA against 25-30% recoup on losses.

With a professional setup you could bust every casino that plays a fair game.
It works out at about 103-104% for the players/referrers on a 99.5% game and 30% referral.

 

[vinylweatherman]

Self Refferal

I have asked this as I had thought of this. Casinoprofitshare (Casino Action) actually allow affiliates to sign up and play through their own codes. Pity they didn't tell me before I played the casinos as it cannot be done retrospectively. They also require that your affiliate codes generate custom other than your own though, as they will consider banning your affiliate account if the concession is used solely to recoup commisson from your own losses. Due to the 'no negative carry' rules is is actually possible to perpetrate a 'fraud' over a number of months that will give a net edge over the casino if you are running ALL the accounts that have signed up. It is this that probably causes most schemes to disallow self referal. Of course two friends can achieve the same net result and the casino would be none the wiser if they made sure they did not give similar details, like living in the same street, playing the same casinos, and in the same style.

 

[dominique]

I think Wager Junction allows it - Geisha and all.

Don't take my word for it though - these type policies change.

 

[The Dude]

I prefer to join a casino via an affiliate account from a webmaster that I know, and then apply the "Biermeister" system. Please refer to the "Winner Screenshots" thread for details

 

[Lurkio]

I prefer to join a casino via an affiliate account from a webmaster that I know, and then apply the "Biermeister" system. Please refer to the "Winner Screenshots" thread for details

So the reverse could apply ?.. you could share your winnings with a webmaster as a quid pro quo for laying off your losses ?!!

I should shut up.I smell a business developing here.

Actually , that could make sense as the odd BIG winner can zero out a months earnings for an affiliate...so it could help ease the pain of someone actually winning..I know a guy who was -15k last month on one program...but there were some chargebacks as well as losses.

 

[peralis]

I prefer to join a casino via an affiliate account from a webmaster that I know, and then apply the "Biermeister" system. Please refer to the "Winner Screenshots" thread for details

Stay away from my site :icon_evil

 

[dominique]

 

[casinogeld]

I think its okay to play as an affiliate with
www.wagerjunction.com

Barcley
www.casinogeld.de

 

[largeeyes]

I prefer to join a casino via an affiliate account from a webmaster that I know, and then apply the "Biermeister" system. Please refer to the "Winner Screenshots" thread for details

AKA, screw the affiliate code. Never show him an affiliate link......