cipher said:
I'm not 100% but I do enjoy an 87% average on what I call "all in" wagers. I've learned to trust my abilities to read the trend analysis developed by the Cipher program and it's served me well.
You're quite right with regards the TRIGGERS and SWITCHBACKS Clayman. But there are also a couple other factors that weigh heavily in all of my sessions. Those are: 1) trend recognition. and 2) my absolute insistence upon wagering enough on any hand that I have confidence in, that if I do win that hand that I'll make money on that hand rather than just pushing dollars. In other words I want the House to pay what I call a profit price for any hand that I wager on.
I'll be finishing that group of 10 sessions up over the next couple of days and then I'll be posting those.
Hi Cipher,
Back home from a little holiday cheer, so forgive me in advance.
After reading all these replies, am I to gather you sell your Cipher system to people? And therefore you cannot define publicly terms like "Switchback" and "Triggers". That's fine, if so. If not, could you define them? Do these definitions remain the same over different software providers?
Since your strands do not include a starting balance, I certainly cannot tell when an "all in" bet has been made to verify your claim of 87% or not in the few strands I have seen. Even so, could you at least give me your definition of an "all in" wager? That is, >99% of outstanding balance, 50% or more, etc? (Notwithstanding your CF 1 scroll where I think you started with a $65 balance. And, if so, you did indeed win both "all in" bets.)
While I can tell you how many times you won or lost on any given bet size, I cannot relate this to outstanding balance at the time of the wager.
Out of your 3,000,000 hands of internet BJ, how many were "all in"? And you say you won 87%? I was born at night, just not last night. If I were you, I'd take the 10-1 easy money of Wiz's betting challenge. Just let him know when the switches and triggers will occur so he will know when to make the "all in" bet.
To tell you the truth I'm not even sure what your point in posting these strands is. Originally I thought it was because you were having some more-favorable-than-usual Playtech results. Now I think it is to sale a system. What is your point? Forgive me for being, no doubt, a little dense.
What exactly is your basic point here of sharing a bunch of ~60 hand results?
You're winning 49% of 79 bets over your average bet size. So what. You're winning 75% of 12 bets over $50. So what. (Only applies to CF). You've won more big bets than not in a favorable run of cards. So what. For heaven's sake, I can win 1/7th of my bankroll 86% of the time by a simple 1/7th, 1/3, 1 progression. I certainly don't need switches and triggers, whatever they are, to do this.
Nonetheless, I look forward to your next 10 session strand, whatever may be it's point.
Any chance you could combine all your Playtech hands from your 3,000,000 into one heckuva strand? Now that would be interesting, at least to me and, I'd guess, many others.
Could you please tell me what happened on hand #58 in your CF 1 on 11-17-04 strand when you had a $5 BJ that paid $5?
And a very Happy Thanksgiving to you and yours. Have a good one.
