Party Poker ends relationship with skins

[paul1]

Completely OT......

Is Stud H/L still around out there? I could not find any in LV except the WSOP tourneys.

I can't think of any. It was never my interest, however. Before 1987, the whole state of California was all forms of draw poker. And there were some 600 small cardrooms throughout the state. Seems like every town had one. Now I believe there are about 80, not counting the Indian casinos. I'd say that high draw is totally extinct, and as can be seen lowball is on its death bed.

Not hard to figure out why. Of course, the popularity of holdem is the biggest factor. But there's no incentive for a cardroom to spread draw or lowball. The collection was about $24 per hour from the whole table of 8 players. In the smallest holdem games they rake close to $100 an hour.

 

[solring]

And there were some 600 small cardrooms throughout the state. Seems like every town had one. Now I believe there are about 80, not counting the Indian casinos.

Link Removed ( Old/Invalid) lists 138 different cardrooms.

I'm proud to say that I've played at 15 of them...

 

[paul1]

Link Removed ( Old/Invalid) lists 138 different cardrooms.

I'm proud to say that I've played at 15 of them...

I clicked that link and I think that is a pretty up-to-date list, off the top of my head. Many of those are Indian casinos and I suspect that if you deduct those it will be close to what I said for small card rooms. There are maybe four or five on that list I would question, which is pretty good because most lists I've seen are way outdated. But that's a pretty good list.

I think the difference is that somehow the state started regulating them in the late 80s, and before that it was generally up to the local governments, so you had literally close to 600 cardrooms here once. That was the good old days. But many "rooms" were just one table in a bar. And many were in some pretty rough parts of towns, not a place where you'd take your wife or girlfriend. Not exactly the Bellagio.

 

[dominique]

I read the press put out by analysts on the financial side of things, and I'm not sure that all the money people understand how skins and online gaming work. I think they may have been double-counting players and are in for a bit of a shock.

I just read yesteday of a survey in the UK that had the result that 93% (!) of the respondents had gambled online. That looks like market saturation right there, there may not be much room for growth in the UK market.

I can see why Party would want to market the casinos side to their poker base, casino customers are 8X more profitable per head than poker customers. Why let those players go play on Playtech or Microgaming sites? I haven't looked at Iglobalmedia's casino software in years, is it any good with respect to interface and game selection?

Note to studio audience: Mary will never play at an Iglobalmedia site. They ripped off casino players for years without apology with gaffed games and that's how they funded their poker side. They did not see anything wrong with that; the distinction being that they considered their casino games to be fair because they were random. I consider them to be a scam because they did not follow the math of the casino games they protrayed--they were essentially slot machines looking like table games such as roulette. They made no disclosure at any time to players that this was the case.

Iglobal, now Party Gaming, will release a new casino with lots of new games etc. I think in February. The entire company product is going to change dramatically. This move by Party Poker was only one small part of the puzzle.

 

[kavaman]

Yep, but who the heck would like to play casino games at the same time as playing poker . Answer:The fishies

So it will mean less money for better players... because the fishies play their money to casino games..

-kavaman

 

[buck]

interesting twist PP to buy empire

News article from

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[Annorax]

Note to studio audience: Mary will never play at an Iglobalmedia site. They ripped off casino players for years without apology with gaffed games and that's how they funded their poker side. They did not see anything wrong with that; the distinction being that they considered their casino games to be fair because they were random. I consider them to be a scam because they did not follow the math of the casino games they protrayed--they were essentially slot machines looking like table games such as roulette. They made no disclosure at any time to players that this was the case.

Note to news anchor: Evidence of gaffed games? I suspect Party's new blackjack may be gaffed, but don't have nearly a big enough sample size to prove it.

 

[sirius]

Note to news anchor: Evidence of gaffed games? I suspect Party's new blackjack may be gaffed, but don't have nearly a big enough sample size to prove it.

They were definitely rigged around 1999-2001 at least. I had a result at Starluck that was in the millions to one chance I think (5 SDs below average) and they definitely knew it was rigged and wouldn't send the log files (they sent them for planetluck but that result wasn't so obviously bad). When wizardofodds didn't control his own advertising he advertised one of the iglobal sites and he recieved complaints and concluded it was rigged after testing it himself.

He used to have a warning on his site about iglobal/partygaming sites on his blacklist but that mysteriously disappeared a few months ago!

 

[dominique]

The software was changed quite some time ago, after the problems surfaced.

I think Michael removed the warnings after he got around to retesting.

I do play slots there - I like some of the features a lot.

 

[paul1]

They were definitely rigged around 1999-2001 at least. I had a result at Starluck that was in the millions to one chance I think (5 SDs below average) and they definitely knew it was rigged and wouldn't send the log files (they sent them for planetluck but that result wasn't so obviously bad). When wizardofodds didn't control his own advertising he advertised one of the iglobal sites and he recieved complaints and concluded it was rigged after testing it himself.

He used to have a warning on his site about iglobal/partygaming sites on his blacklist but that mysteriously disappeared a few months ago!

There was a thread here not too long ago (within the last year I think) that showed repeat hands in their video poker. The same exact hands within a few minutes of each other. I don't remember if the issue was ever resolved. I'd like to know what happened with that.

 

[pokeraddict]

I am 99% sure this was never resolved. Seemingly swept under the carpet.

 

[paul1]

I am 99% sure this was never resolved. Seemingly swept under the carpet.

Maybe Bryan could ask when at that convention.

I, myself, have mixed thoughts on this kind of stuff. I know when I first started playing, I was convinced that MG's blackjack was "funny" and there was nothing anyone could tell me otherwise. So I stopped playing it. But I know gamblers are generally paranoid about these things and I don't want to be like that. Now I read what Sirius just said about IGlobal's blackjack, and I respect Sirius's opinion. I'm really confused. I just would not expect the big names in the industry to do anything not on the square. I just don't get it. I just, don't, get it.

Oh, and I must have missed what was at Wizardofodds on that subject. Gee, I would have liked to have read that.

 

[amandajm]

What the wiz had to say about igm?

Link >> Link Outdated / Removed

 

[mary]

I talked with them at an industry show. They freely admitted that their original software was not replicating the mathematical peformance of cards etc. Claimed that they hadn't known, it was the programmers' fault, and that their new software in development in India would be fair.

Of course, Starluck and Planetluck ran bonus promos all the time for games such as roulette that would have busted out the house if they'd been fair. So these guys really didn't give a ****.

They did not make any effort to refund losses to anybody; did not rollout the "fair" software immediately when they had it; and just didn't seem to really think it was of much concern.

So, I won't ever play at any Iglobalmedia games, including the poker. It's not important to them to run an honest game; only if they think they'll be caught.

 

[amandajm]

The bbc money programme just ran an

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

and never bothered with the "flawed" software thing.

Of course I made the point to the BBC. I can only report your words and thoughts second hand Mary. If more did so, maybe this firm could be made answerable somehow and see fit to send the money they gleaned to charity.

 

[DsyGrl]

I am so glad that Party Poker isn't on the "accredited" list. That was my worst online experience ever. I, too, experienced some of their other sites. I would NEVER recommend to a friend! I was shocked to find out how many people that I know actually play there.

 

[The Dude]

I am so glad that Party Poker isn't on the "accredited" list. That was my worst online experience ever. I, too, experienced some of their other sites. I would NEVER recommend to a friend! I was shocked to find out how many people that I know actually play there.

I had them up there for a little while, but I'm not fully satisfied with their handling of their software issues in the casino realm. There are a number of issues in the complaints forum that linger.