Rusty
Banned User - repetitive flaming
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2006
- Location
- Manchester UK
Maybe not suspicious but you did coincidently give a good reason yourself why it might be suspicious.
No max cashout rule could get expensive sure but you think that was an accident they only noticed after 5 Days?
Hardly plausible is it?
So you could see it as the objective was for the Progressive to be won on this chip and then it was closed down.
It is open to speculation but as always we are short on information since Rival casinos generally say nothing.
KK says innocent until proved guilty which is fine in a court case where the prosecution has legal entitlement to all the evidence and gets to cross examine the witnesses but we don't have that luxury so we must speculate and come to our own conclusions based on the little facts we have.
If this were a trial though it sure would make an interesting jury room if a cross section of the members here were the jurors.
Has Jeff been paid yet by the way?
No max cashout rule could get expensive sure but you think that was an accident they only noticed after 5 Days?
Hardly plausible is it?
So you could see it as the objective was for the Progressive to be won on this chip and then it was closed down.
It is open to speculation but as always we are short on information since Rival casinos generally say nothing.
KK says innocent until proved guilty which is fine in a court case where the prosecution has legal entitlement to all the evidence and gets to cross examine the witnesses but we don't have that luxury so we must speculate and come to our own conclusions based on the little facts we have.
If this were a trial though it sure would make an interesting jury room if a cross section of the members here were the jurors.
Has Jeff been paid yet by the way?