Ntt261290 vs Casumo

Status
Not open for further replies.

maxd

Complaints (PAB) Manager
Staff member
Joined
Jan 20, 2004
Location
Saltirelandia
of cours he will rate 9.3 he makes money from Casumo,we get withdraw hold,we get feed up dealing with Casumo blow al balance and Casumo and Casinomeister make money from are lost
You are relatively new here so I'll make this a Warning rather than a full ban:

If you've spent any time on the site, or paid much attention to the way things work around here, you'd know full well that that what you are saying is a load of rubbish.

Casinos get their ratings per the description Bryan has given here: Casino Reviews: Rating System Explanation - Casinomeister. You'll see that most of the rating is determined automatically, in other words by the criteria specified. Bryan does reserve a small percentage of the Rating for personal discretion but I believe that is around 10% or less of the overall Rating.

And no, casinos can't buy, barter or bribe their way into a higher rating. Some sites do that, we don't.

If in the end you insist on believing otherwise you are welcome to take your forum time elsewhere.

If you persist in slagging off the site you'll discover that you are in violation of the Forum Rules:
1.19 - Posting defamatory comments or conducting malicious attacks directed at Casinomeister: members who slander, post defamatory comments or other personal garbage directed toward the Casinomeister brand, its owner, employees, or moderators, anywhere on the Internet will be swiftly booted from the site. ....
So, fair warning, a repeat performance of the above is going to see you sitting curbside. 'Nuff said about that.

Also, I've already said more than once that Casumo's Rating is going to be reviewed by Bryan given the current state of affairs. I believe that process is already underway.
 
Last edited:

GameRoom

Banned User
Joined
Nov 23, 2019
Location
please don't abuse this field
You are relatively new here so I'll make this a Warning rather than a full ban:

If you've spent any time on the site, or paid much attention to the way things work around here, you'd know full well that that what you are saying is a load of rubbish.

Casinos get their ratings per the description Bryan has given here: Casino Reviews: Rating System Explanation - Casinomeister. You'll see that most of the rating is determined automatically, in other words by the criteria specified. Bryan does reserve a small percentage of the Rating for personal discretion but I believe that is around 10% or less of the overall Rating.

And no, casinos can't buy, barter or bribe their way into a higher rating. Some sites do that, we don't.

If in the end you insist on believing otherwise you are welcome to take your forum time elsewhere.

If you persist in slagging off the site you'll discover that you are in violation of the Forum Rules:


So, fair warning, a repeat performance of the above is going to see you sitting curbside. 'Nuff said about that.

Also, I've already said more than once that Casumo's Rating is going to be reviewed by Bryan given the current state of affairs. I believe that process is already underway.
lol stop making fake Casino reviews,we the one join from links and you guys make income from are lost,lol you realy think I care if you threat me to ban me get life mate,and go do real reviews so players dont get scam
 

maxd

Complaints (PAB) Manager
Staff member
Joined
Jan 20, 2004
Location
Saltirelandia
lol stop making fake Casino reviews,we the one join from links and you guys make income from are lost,lol you realy think I care if you threat me to ban me get life mate,and go do real reviews so players dont get scam
Adios cupcake.
 

Ntt261290

Newbie member
PABinit
Joined
Mar 9, 2020
Location
Canada
I think we were perfectly clear about your situation. You claim a family member is funding your casino play but cannot prove to the casino's satisfaction that that is legitimate.

I told you flat out that your situation is very unusual and that the casino is perfectly justified IN THIS CASE to be unusually thorough in their SOW demands.

The bottom line in your case is simple: either satisfy the casino's requirements -- which you've already said were unreasonable and that you would not comply -- or accept the fact that they will not pay you because you've failed SOW. Complaining here that you've been poorly served is BS.
Hi ! The problem is not about prove the Casino the funds that I got from my family member. They are very clear about that also. But what they asked me is : “ all the deposits that I put into my bank account from December 2019 till February 2020, and I opened the account with Casumo on February 14. If you want to make some justice here you need to look into details by what I send them or what they emailed back. Not just listening to what they said to you and now you are saying I can not prove them the funds from Family member. Let me remind you that I did send them everything related to the funds from my family member and I have no problem with that ! By the way even if I don’t qualify for their sow, do they have right to keep my winning money ? If you want I can post all the emails in here for everyone to read. $6000 is not a big deal but if you want to help then do it right. I’m not waiting for 6 months for something like this. Basically you just repeat what Casuno said to you to me !
 

maxd

Complaints (PAB) Manager
Staff member
Joined
Jan 20, 2004
Location
Saltirelandia
Say what you like but you signed on to the casino knowing that SOW could be and probably would be part of the KYC process. Whether you want to deny it now or not the bottom line is that you have not provided sufficient documentation of your gambling funds to satisfy the casino. Until that happens there is no way on earth you should receive your winnings.

For all they know, or us for that matter, you are laundering money and trying to use the complaints path to pressure the casino into paying you. I sincerely hope they stick to their current position and do not pay you until they get the SOW documentation they require.

As to your repeated accusation that I'm only repeating to you what the casino has already told you: yes, quite right, that's what happens when the casino has a legitimate case and you don't. Provide the necessary documentation and things may change. Do nothing but keep repeating the same rubbish and you'll get nowhere with me or your complaint. And you'll likely get kicked to the curb per the Forum Rules, items 1.11, 1.18 and 1.19.

Also, taking a week off and then coming back to repeat the same BS is a pretty classic fraudster tactic. FYI.
 

X-Raided

Keep It Simple, Stupid.
PABinit
Joined
Aug 24, 2010
Location
Your Happy Place
So, this money is still currently in limbo and until NTT261290 can satisfy the SOW in full, he then receives his 6K?

If that's the case, my time wouldn't be allocated anywhere but being in contact with my bank to
get all that's needed and get my winnings. By OP not doing this, it shows maybe there's more to
the story than meets the eye. Every transaction ever made can be dug up and proven with a little
bit of maneuvering and patience.
 

maxd

Complaints (PAB) Manager
Staff member
Joined
Jan 20, 2004
Location
Saltirelandia
Exactly! Early on the OP said "the casino doesn't need that information and I won't give it to them" (I've paraphrased). Anything else he says or has said thereafter is beside the point. Not to put too fine a point on it but "change your position or piss off" is pretty much where this issue has come to rest. And it will stay there until the OP delivers what the casino requires. Full stop.

Later addition: at this point the OP has stalled for so long in getting the casino the SOW documentation they asked for months and months ago that they would be perfectly justified in ignoring him if he suddenly did produce said documents. One of the unwritten rules of Fraud Detection is that anyone can forge anything if they have enough time to do so. The OP has had 6 months and anything that suddenly popped up would, and should, be highly suspect.
 
Last edited:

X-Raided

Keep It Simple, Stupid.
PABinit
Joined
Aug 24, 2010
Location
Your Happy Place
Exactly! Early on the OP said "the casino doesn't need that information and I won't give it to them". Anything else he says or has said thereafter is beside the point. Not to put too fine a point on it but "change your position or piss off" is pretty much where this issue has come to rest. And it will stay there until the OP delivers what the casino requires. Full stop.

Yeah, I agree. I went through a PAB years and years ago and felt that CM was always on my side.
The process works if you're in the right. Period.

Family funding casino play, can't get info on previous transactions, "$6000 is not a big deal".. When someone
says that, there's more than meets the eye. Fuggedaboutit!
 

Robert Rabbit

Newbie member
Joined
Jun 21, 2020
Location
UK
Yeah, I agree. I went through a PAB years and years ago and felt that CM was always on my side.
The process works if you're in the right. Period.

Family funding casino play, can't get info on previous transactions, "$6000 is not a big deal".. When someone
says that, there's more than meets the eye. Fuggedaboutit!
Also note his original comment that this wife deposited $60,000 in 3 weeks. I'm struggling to see the issue here. Happy to give bank statements from Feb but not the 2 months before - why the hell not, did Pablo Escobar make his annual deposits in Dec and Jan :). Jeez, I would just send them the bank statements and get my money, only one losing out her is the OP
 

X-Raided

Keep It Simple, Stupid.
PABinit
Joined
Aug 24, 2010
Location
Your Happy Place
Also note his original comment that this wife deposited $60,000 in 3 weeks. I'm struggling to see the issue here. Happy to give bank statements from Feb but not the 2 months before - why the hell not, did Pablo Escobar make his annual deposits in Dec and Jan :). Jeez, I would just send them the bank statements and get my money, only one losing out her is the OP
Yep! Red flag city. The casino is just trying to protect themselves, as any business would. They don't want potential money launderers bringing money in from oversees and potentially being gambled on their site. They suspected something from the jump and if the OP has nothing to hide, he could of satisfied their demands without any issues. I would of jumped through hoops to comply for my $600 in winnings but $6,000? I would walk through walls to get my winnings.
 

goatwack

He's an Asshole, sir
CAG
Joined
Aug 30, 2012
Location
Londonia
My gripe would be how in subsequent exchanges the OP mentioned 'Money Laundering' rather a lot, which might not be the most prudent thing to do prior to a SoW shakedown.

Almost on par with walking through an airport and uttering "Did you see that documentary on the history of explosives last night?"

And as much as Casumo has a painted history, and would likely allow players to deposit funds despite supposed AML triggers being exceeded ('it ain't dirty money if it's not theirs!'), I shouldn't imagine printing a bank statement PDF for a couple of people would prove too troublesome. Not 'six months' troublesome anyway

And will people stop with the cross-people gambling already. Just use your own dodgy money on your account will ya
 

maxd

Complaints (PAB) Manager
Staff member
Joined
Jan 20, 2004
Location
Saltirelandia
... I would just send them the bank statements and get my money ...
The OP will say "I did provide those bank statements" but that is not the point. This is a SOW investigation, and where the OP's incoming money came from is the exactly question the casino has asked and the OP has not sufficiently answered.

What the OP has said is "my rich uncle gave it to me". The casino says "prove that your rich uncle has the means to do so". Invasive yes but WTF, that's what SOW is! Anyway the OP said "not their business, I won't do it".

Well, guess what, that's a bucket of water in the gastank insofar as getting your money goes. If nothing happens thereafter who exactly do you have to blame? And dragging the moaning out for 6 months is not going to improve your chances any.

IMO it's time to stick a fork in this one because it's DOA.
 

X-Raided

Keep It Simple, Stupid.
PABinit
Joined
Aug 24, 2010
Location
Your Happy Place
Surely the right thing to do here though, is for the casino to submit a SAR.
What if the rich Uncle said, piss off I'm not giving you my bank statements etc to pass to a casino?
Don't gamble with your rich uncle's money.

Do you think the "rich uncle" had knowledge that his nephew was gambling money he was sending?
Who's to say that his "rich uncle" wasn't sending money to help fund a business their involved in, or
help with some sort of financial situation?

I mean, if I didn't have the money to gamble, and was so addicted that I had to ask a wealthy family member for money to help fund my sickness, they would tell me to piss off and get some help.
 

colinsunderland

Experienced Member
webmeister
MM
Joined
Jan 28, 2016
Location
uk
Don't gamble with your rich uncle's money.

Do you think the "rich uncle" had knowledge that his nephew was gambling money he was sending?
Who's to say that his "rich uncle" wasn't sending money to help fund a business their involved in, or
help with some sort of financial situation?

I mean, if I didn't have the money to gamble, and was so addicted that I had to ask a wealthy family member for money to help fund my sickness, they would tell me to piss off and get some help.
But (unless I missed something) the first post states this is an anti money laundering request, so what has affordability or addiction got to do with it?

If Casumo have genuine concerns the money he is using isn't legitimate, then they should submit a SAR and get clear guidance on how to proceed from the relevant authority. If they don't have a genuine concern then they should pay him surely?
 

Robert Rabbit

Newbie member
Joined
Jun 21, 2020
Location
UK
My gripe would be how in subsequent exchanges the OP mentioned 'Money Laundering' rather a lot, which might not be the most prudent thing to do prior to a SoW shakedown.

Almost on par with walking through an airport and uttering "Did you see that documentary on the history of explosives last night?"

And as much as Casumo has a painted history, and would likely allow players to deposit funds despite supposed AML triggers being exceeded ('it ain't dirty money if it's not theirs!'), I shouldn't imagine printing a bank statement PDF for a couple of people would prove too troublesome. Not 'six months' troublesome anyway

And will people stop with the cross-people gambling already. Just use your own dodgy money on your account will ya
My gripe would be how in subsequent exchanges the OP mentioned 'Money Laundering' rather a lot, which might not be the most prudent thing to do prior to a SoW shakedown.

Almost on par with walking through an airport and uttering "Did you see that documentary on the history of explosives last night?"

And as much as Casumo has a painted history, and would likely allow players to deposit funds despite supposed AML triggers being exceeded ('it ain't dirty money if it's not theirs!'), I shouldn't imagine printing a bank statement PDF for a couple of people would prove too troublesome. Not 'six months' troublesome anyway

And will people stop with the cross-people gambling already. Just use your own dodgy money on your account will ya
Surely the right thing to do here though, is for the casino to submit a SAR.
What if the rich Uncle said, piss off I'm not giving you my bank statements etc to pass to a casino?
He couldn't anyway - he deals strictly in cash when the speedboats come racing across from Amsterdam while the coastguard are otherwise engaged :)
 

Playford7

Meister Member
MM
Joined
Jul 10, 2016
Location
North east England
OP is full of it.
Close the thread and let the clown moan elsewhere.
He’s either stupid rich not to care for 6k or as said a blatant fraud.
 

goatwack

He's an Asshole, sir
CAG
Joined
Aug 30, 2012
Location
Londonia
OP is full of it.
Close the thread and let the clown moan elsewhere.
He’s either stupid rich not to care for 6k or as said a blatant fraud.
You haven't really told us what you think. Could you elaborate a little?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top