Question Novomatic/Greentube stand alone slots better than the multi players?


Megaways Slots, as useless as salt in your coffee
Hey guys,

Anyone who ever played Novomatic knows most of their slots are pretty high variance.
I play these for several years now and do enjoy them as they can be darn rewarding.

Lately I found a few casino's where you can play a few Novomatic slots like on SkyVegas etc etc etc.
Difference with casino's like Quasargaming and Stargames is that you get to play a stand alone slot on SkyVegas for example where you can pick out of 100 or 200 of the same slots (multi player environment) on Quasar and Stargames.

I find the stand alone slots much more reliable although they should be powered by the same technology?Greentube...

Where on Quasar and Stargames I had sessions where it litterarly took me 1500-2000 spins before triggering a feature on Lucky Lady Charm for example,on the stand alone machines it seems to follow a pattern that matches with MGS/Netent slots where a feature triggers ON average every 150 spins-ish,right?

So are both platforms bahaving differently in both variance and RTP then?

Just wondering here..

Any Novomatic player knows what I mean with above post,I hope.... *smirks*


Staff member
I've played both a fair bit and I have to admit I haven't seen anything to suggest the stand-alone version is different I'm afraid. But I'll keep my eyes open when I play them next.

As for the free spins, I'd guess an average of about 1 in 300/350 for games like LLC and 1 in 150 or so for Ra and LOTO.


Well-Known Member
im on the average anywhere near 50- 400 around that figure but i have gone more than this on a few games , i only play at Quasar gaming i dont hold a account at ovo or star games , so would of thought maybe its just been crap (