1. By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies .This website or its third-party tools use cookies, which are necessary to its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy.Find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Dismiss Notice
  3. Follow Casinomeister on Twitter | Facebook | YouTube | Casinomeister.us US Residents Click here! |  Svenska Svenska | 
Dismiss Notice
REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do diddly squat without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view most discussions: you can't make contact with thousands of fellow players, affiliates, casino reps, and all sorts of other riff-raff.

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Casinomeister here!

not "burning with desire"

Discussion in 'Online Casinos' started by hobobiker, Feb 24, 2009.

    Feb 24, 2009
  1. hobobiker

    hobobiker Dormant account

    Occupation:
    retired
    Location:
    Manchester UK
    I know this will be really boring and old hat to some people , and i know that some will put it down to my lack of experience/too big an intial stake/ should of started at 1p a spin/ shouldnt gamble at midnight on the 14th of the month / i was wearing the wrong colour underpants/ there are leaves on the track / i should be thankfull cos im a dick ..etc etc etc ...

    but just had a session on " burning desire" slot ......logged on and started with about 90quids and ended up with 0 quids, and if anyone thinks that this is an expected or normal result ....... then tell me so........because its time to call it a day if 32% return on 90quid is anywhere near right
    32 bloody percent ?????? pretty apt number really....
    whats goin on with the world dude's


    Login Name: 32re0******
    Show Games Show Detailed Statement 0
    Games you Played in Login Session 4249268:
    Description/Burning Desire Wagered Payout

    205011 View 2/24/2009 2:15:53 AM 2.50 0.20
    205012 View 2/24/2009 2:15:58 AM 2.50 15.00
    205013 View 2/24/2009 2:15:58 AM 2.50 0.00
    205014 View 2/24/2009 2:16:07 AM 2.50 0.00
    205015 View 2/24/2009 2:16:11 AM 2.50 0.00
    205016 View 2/24/2009 2:16:15 AM 2.50 0.00
    205017 View 2/24/2009 2:16:19 AM 2.50 0.00
    205018 View 2/24/2009 2:16:27 AM 2.50 1.50
    205019 View 2/24/2009 2:16:27 AM 2.50 0.00
    205020 View 2/24/2009 2:16:33 AM 2.50 0.00
    205021 View 2/24/2009 2:16:41 AM 2.50 0.00
    205022 View 2/24/2009 2:16:50 AM 2.50 0.70
    205023 View 2/24/2009 2:16:55 AM 2.50 0.50
    205024 View 2/24/2009 2:16:55 AM 2.50 0.00
    205025 View 2/24/2009 2:17:05 AM 2.50 0.70
    205026 View 2/24/2009 2:17:10 AM 2.50 2.50
    205027 View 2/24/2009 2:17:10 AM 2.50 0.00
    205028 View 2/24/2009 2:17:15 AM 2.50 0.00
    205029 View 2/24/2009 2:17:19 AM 2.50 0.00
    205030 View 2/24/2009 2:17:28 AM 2.50 2.00
    205031 View 2/24/2009 2:17:28 AM 2.50 0.00
    205032 View 2/24/2009 2:17:33 AM 2.50 0.00
    205033 View 2/24/2009 2:17:42 AM 2.50 1.50
    205034 View 2/24/2009 2:17:42 AM 2.50 0.00
    205035 View 2/24/2009 2:18:00 AM 2.50 1.20
    205036 View 2/24/2009 2:18:00 AM 2.50 0.00
    205037 View 2/24/2009 2:18:08 AM 2.50 0.20
    205038 View 2/24/2009 2:18:13 AM 2.50 1.50
    205039 View 2/24/2009 2:18:18 AM 2.50 0.20
    205040 View 2/24/2009 2:18:24 AM 2.50 0.50
    205041 View 2/24/2009 2:18:24 AM 2.50 0.00
    205042 View 2/24/2009 2:18:33 AM 2.50 0.20
    205043 View 2/24/2009 2:18:33 AM 2.50 0.00
    205044 View 2/24/2009 2:18:38 AM 2.50 0.00
    205045 View 2/24/2009 2:18:42 AM 2.50 0.00
    205046 View 2/24/2009 2:19:12 AM 2.50 2.50
    205047 View 2/24/2009 2:19:20 AM 1.25 0.00
    205048 View 2/24/2009 2:19:29 AM 1.25 0.10
    205049 View 2/24/2009 2:19:29 AM 1.25 0.00
    205050 View 2/24/2009 2:19:33 AM 1.25 0.00
    205051 View 2/24/2009 2:19:37 AM 1.25 0.00
    205052 View 2/24/2009 2:19:45 AM 1.25 0.35
    205053 View 2/24/2009 2:19:51 AM 1.25 1.25
    205054 View 2/24/2009 2:19:51 AM 1.25 0.00
    205055 View 2/24/2009 2:20:01 AM 1.25 0.35
    205056 View 2/24/2009 2:20:01 AM 1.25 0.00
    205057 View 2/24/2009 2:20:06 AM 1.25 0.00
    205058 View 2/24/2009 2:20:10 AM 1.25 0.00
    205059 View 2/24/2009 2:20:21 AM 1.00 4.00
    205060 View 2/24/2009 2:20:21 AM 1.00 0.00
    205061 View 2/24/2009 2:20:26 AM 1.00 0.00
    205062 View 2/24/2009 2:20:30 AM 1.00 0.00
    205063 View 2/24/2009 2:20:40 AM 1.00 1.00
    205064 View 2/24/2009 2:20:40 AM 1.00 0.00
    205065 View 2/24/2009 2:20:45 AM 1.00 0.00
    205066 View 2/24/2009 2:20:49 AM 1.00 0.00
    205067 View 2/24/2009 2:20:53 AM 1.00 0.00
    205068 View 2/24/2009 2:20:58 AM 1.00 0.00
    205069 View 2/24/20092:21:02 AM 1.00 0.00
    205070 View 2/24/20092:21:07 AM 1.00 0.00
    205071 View 2/24/2009 2:21:11 AM 1.00 0.00
    205072 View 2/24/20092:21:15 AM 1.00 0.00
    205073 View 2/24/20092:21:19 AM 1.00 0.00
    205074 View 2/24/20092:21:32 AM 0.75 3.00
    205075 View 2/24/20092:21:35 AM 0.50 0.00
    205076 View 2/24/20092:21:40 AM 0.50 0.00
    205077 View 2/24/20092:21:45 AM 0.50 0.00
    205078 View 2/24/20092:21:53 AM 0.50 0.50
    205079 View 2/24/20092:21:53 AM 0.50 0.00
    205080 View 2/24/20092:21:58 AM 0.50 0.00
    205081 View 2/24/2009 2:22:02 AM 0.50 0.00
    205082 View 2/24/2009 2:22:06 AM 0.50 0.00
    205083 View 2/24/2009 2:22:10 AM 0.50 0.00
    205084 View 2/24/2009 2:22:18 AM 0.50 0.10
    205085 View 2/24/2009 2:22:18 AM 0.50 0.00
    205086 View 2/24/2009 2:22:24 AM 0.50 0.00
    205087 View 2/24/2009 2:22:28 AM 0.50 0.00
    205088 View 2/24/2009 2:22:32 AM 0.50 0.00
    205089 View 2/24/2009 2:22:41 AM 0.50 0.50
    205090 View 2/24/2009 2:22:47 AM 0.50 0.04
    205091 View 2/24/2009 2:22:47 AM 0.50 0.00
    205092 View 2/24/2009 2:22:51 AM 0.50 0.00
    205093 View 2/24/2009 2:23:01 AM 0.25 0.02
    205094 View 2/24/2009 2:23:01 AM 0.25 0.00
    205095 View 2/24/2009 2:23:06 AM 0.25 0.00
    205096 View 2/24/2009 2:23:10 AM 0.25 0.00
    205097 View 2/24/2009 2:23:14 AM 0.25 0.00
    205098 View 2/24/2009 2:23:18 AM 0.25 0.00
    205099 View 2/24/2009 2:23:27 AM 0.25 0.02
    205100 View 2/24/2009 2:23:31 AM 0.25 0.07
    205101 View 2/24/2009 2:23:36 AM 0.25 0.05
    205102 View 2/24/2009 2:23:36 AM 0.25 0.00
    205103 View 2/24/2009 2:23:45 AM 0.25 0.05
    205104 View 2/24/2009 2:23:45 AM 0.25 0.00
    205105 View 2/24/2009 2:23:50 AM 0.25 0.00
    205106 View 2/24/2009 2:23:54 AM 0.25 0.00
    205107 View 2/24/2009 2:23:58 AM 0.25 0.00
    205108 View 2/24/2009 2:24:03 AM 0.25 0.00
    205109 View 2/24/2009 2:24:07 AM 0.25 0.00
    205110 View 2/24/2009 2:24:20 AM 0.25 0.15
    205111 View 2/24/2009 2:24:20 AM 0.25 0.00
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    totals 134.50 42.45

    .....just plain wrong.
     
  2. Feb 24, 2009
  3. lauram

    lauram Dormant account

    Occupation:
    self employed
    Location:
    toronto
    Im sure one of the guys that follow all those stats will kick in and tell us more on what your asking. The other day was my first hit on that game 92 dollar hit on 50 cent bet. But mg has become so tight with just about all their games.
    I had a few of their games on auto spin myself 100 spins 40 50 cent spins and only a few did i hit over my bet size no free spins or bonus rounds. Just sucks the fun right out of it all. When my puter was acting up the spins took forever to spin around and i would bet money on it by watching them go around they have removed some of the scatter buttons off the reels. Some that use to have 3 on say reel 2 now have just the one. Found the same in rtg games.
    I know they say it is just luck maybe so, but with all the casinos so tight the past while and the way they are banning players they wont have a lot of the regulars depositing if they dont shape up.
     
  4. Feb 25, 2009
  5. KasinoKing

    KasinoKing WebMeister & Slotaholic.. CAG MM PABnonaccred webmeister

    Occupation:
    House-Husband and Casino Advisor
    Location:
    Bexhill on sea, England
    Well you've pretty much said it all yourself. :thumbsup:
    Sorry, but despite all the advise myself & others here have tried to give, you seem to just totally ignore it, go your own way, then moan when things like this happen.

    Once again, just for you:
    Burning Desire is a very high-variance Bonus Video slot; you get loads & loads of spins of zilch or pathetic tiny wins (as your log shows). This is because the bulk of the slot's payout comes from hitting a good free-spin bonus round.
    I don't know any stats for this slot, but I think it would be a very good bet to assume the bonus only hits once in every 140 - 160 spins, like most of their other slots. (That was my experience when I played it & lost a fortune :mad:)

    You played only 101 spins - the odds were very much against you hitting the bonus feature.
    We all know MG (or any) slots can go way over 3, 4, 5 or even more times the average number of spins between features, just as they can also give 4 or 5 in a very short session.

    So yes, you are right, you should have started with lower bets and been prepared to go at least 300 spins without hitting the bonus. This is what slots do. I get exactly the same crap as you from time to time, but I don't moan about it, just the same as I don't post every time I get a 150%+ positive return from a slot.

    We all get good luck & bad luck - it's what you do with that luck which counts.

    KK
    PS: I find black underpants are the luckiest... :p
     
  6. Feb 26, 2009
  7. KasinoKing

    KasinoKing WebMeister & Slotaholic.. CAG MM PABnonaccred webmeister

    Occupation:
    House-Husband and Casino Advisor
    Location:
    Bexhill on sea, England
    Oh the ironic sods law of it! This thread prompted me to give this beast a few more low-roller spins, and just 44 spins in I hit the top-paying combination! :thumbsup: (Funny thing is, I wasn't wearing any underpants at all! :p)

    Top combo (5 Diamonds)... but only total bet x 124... :what: go figure!
     
  8. Feb 26, 2009
  9. hobobiker

    hobobiker Dormant account

    Occupation:
    retired
    Location:
    Manchester UK
    but i like moaning.

    thats because 150% return is nowt to moan about

    im lost on this one ...... give us a clue then , throw it in the bin ? burn it? pretend your not in when it calls round.


    and on another note .... main bike is a 1200 sporster ( bit girly i know...but i like the sporsters , bit neater than than the 1340;s) a honda Xl500r ive had for years cos its brill, i love the honda singles ... (rs250, xl,s and the xbr500 was a really nice engine) also got a 1954 bsa A10 gold flash .... had about 20yrs ....took it of road about 12years ago to restore it ....you know the story ...its still in the corner in bits. bloody too scary to ride nowdays anyhow with single leading shoe drum brakes on a cable.......try stopping at 50mph when some volvo twat with traction control and abs brakes in front with a stopping distance of 3inches.... ... mind you the old xs750 an 850s (had an 850) took some stoppin ... think they weighed about half ton dry ..and the brake pads were made of wood in the seventies (well thats what it felt like compared to the new bikes) ... ahhh i cannot wait till august ....im been good this time .... dont fancy another spell at HMP for disqualfied drivin....8weeks last time... think ill wait it out this time
     
  10. Feb 26, 2009
  11. shoust

    shoust Full Member

    Occupation:
    Cleaner
    Location:
    England
    Says in the paytable, "Only highest win is paid per way". Not sure why that is, but it stinks..
     

Share This Page