Deleted member 57619 vs King Billy Casino

  • Thread starter Deleted member 57619
  • Start date
again I apologize, it was so strange because colinsunderland last reply of what he claimed I said in the AskGamblers forum thread before I posted the pm, was the total opposite of what he now pm'ed me!!! and it just made me wonder about certain members here!!! I guess I did it in haste without thinking!

I have read all the forum rules now, and apologize sincerely!!!!!
no it wasn't the exact opposite.
I told you it was hard to understand the rules, and that I understood that it wasn't your fault, but I also told you your calculations were wrong, and that the rep made it clear you weren't getting paid, so I would find another casino to play at, then offered to let you know of others I know are trustworth if you let me know where you are and what you like playing.

Nothing what I said was the opposite of what my last post before you sent me a PM stated.

Don't make me out to be a liar again or I will destroy you.
 
no it wasn't the exact opposite.
I told you it was hard to understand the rules, and that I understood that it wasn't your fault, but I also told you your calculations were wrong, and that the rep made it clear you weren't getting paid, so I would find another casino to play at, then offered to let you know of others I know are trustworth if you let me know where you are and what you like playing.

Nothing what I said was the opposite of what my last post before you sent me a PM stated.

Don't make me out to be a liar again or I will destroy you.

Love it :lolup:.

The OP is so full of it and not the sharpest tool in the box.

Thinking he can copy and past, only the part of a PM which suits his agenda, was never going to end well.
 
well in the end all that matters is that colinsunderland said that king billy is not trustworthy and the cashback scheme is ambiguous, and that it wasn't my fault. and again the math is not right because ruslan is adding in gross wins not net wins in the equation. like what Paul said if I bet 150 I win 150, not 300!! thanks for all your input but I will wait on The Pogg for their response!!
 
well in the end all that matters is that colinsunderland said that king billy is not trustworthy and the cashback scheme is ambiguous, and that it wasn't my fault. and again the math is not right because ruslan is adding in gross wins not net wins in the equation. like what Paul said if I bet 150 I win 150, not 300!! thanks for all your input but I will wait on The Pogg for their response!!

What did I say about calling me a liar? I posted what I said in my PM reply to your unsolicited PM. I didn't say kingbilly were 'not trustworthy' at all. The lies you are telling on here, no wonder you are having problems getting paid.

Still don't see anything relating to you on the Pogg

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
I'm confused for many different way about this thread, just have to post something to stay tuned if there finally is place who gives you more cashback than you deposit (thought arbs only exist in betting/exchange world).

Even more wondering why to spend so much time and energy to fights against windmills, even though OP would be 100% right, why casino who operate under Curacao license would change their opinion, especially when they in their honest opinion are right (and in this case so far it seems one person who disagrees in this thread)? Even they would be wrong, there's no really legislation to make them change their mind or at least don't hear many stories about people and successful Curacao court cases.
 
Even more wondering why to spend so much time and energy to fights against windmills, even though OP would be 100% right, why casino who operate under Curacao license would change their opinion, especially when they in their honest opinion are right (and in this case so far it seems one person who disagrees in this thread)? Even they would be wrong, there's no really legislation to make them change their mind or at least don't hear many stories about people and successful Curacao court cases.

I get where you are coming from, but even though they may be licensed in a flaccid gambling licensing jurisdiction, it doesn't mean they won't do the right thing. There are a number of casinos licensed there that have been in business for decades and rely on proper ethical casino managerial behavior. So I would not tarnish them with the same brush.
 
Last edited:
@nirankali what is your point in posting all of this? Can't you just wait until thepogg finishes what he has started? I mean, if he rules in favor of the casino, you're going to have a lot of egg on your face.
 
I get where you are coming from, but even though they may be licensed in a flaccid gambling licensing jurisdiction, it doesn't mean they won't do the right thing. There are a number of casinos licensed there that have been in business for decades and rely on proper ethical casino managerial behavior. So I would not tarnish them with the same brush.

Badly phrased, meant more that if casino have already replied to OP:s official complaint, there is not many ways left to casino change their mind after they have reviewed it for that complaint and nothing new have appear. Feels just really final decision for me, would license be whichever (for MGA there is working complaint channel but to Curacao not that much).
 
Badly phrased, meant more that if casino have already replied to OP:s official complaint, there is not many ways left to casino change their mind after they have reviewed it for that complaint and nothing new have appear. Feels just really final decision for me, would license be whichever (for MGA there is working complaint channel but to Curacao not that much).
Oh - I meant that too, but was using telepathy. :D Yes, if a casino is licensed there, you can only hope that they will do the right thing.

And just to add - we have had a number of casinos change their minds after they have listened to us during the PAB process. They don't always get it right the first time 'round. This is the importance for having good relationships with casino operators, and who are willing to listen to the voice of reason.
 
And just to add - we have had a number of casinos change their minds after they have listened to us during the PAB process. They don't always get it right the first time 'round. This is the importance for having good relationships with casino operators, and who are willing to listen to the voice of reason.

Just jumping in here to add that there's another aspect to this that tends to skew things toward casinos cleaning off their glasses and taking a second look: internally complaints are often handled by junior (and all too often poorly trained) staff. When we come to the casino with the case the warning flag often gets run a lot further up the pole, meaning that if they give a damn it's often someone more senior making the call, exactly because it's us (or another respected ADR for that matter).

Casumo is (was) a great example, I've been dealing directly with senior staff for years. That's changed recently but the point is that there have been a good many cases that got looked into a lot deeper exactly because of that relationship.
 
So that would make you guys (The Pogg, Casinomeister) super hero's trying to protect civilians from casinos that are doing injustice, in a city (curaçao) that's not policed well! Kind of like the Avengers!!
 
no response from The Pogg, but my vip rep said that The Pogg escalated the complaint to their service provider soft Swiss and none of the managers would be in on the investigation. I'm confused bc I'm a newbie and asking what this means??
 
Last edited by a moderator:
And i thought i was the crazy one... lol at least when i complain i don't expect casinos to give me more money from a cashback than my deposit or whatever it is. I just read the thread and wonder if it's trolling or not lol. Some guy got insanely lucky from a casino mistake... if it was me i wouldve shadap and hide somewhere not go crazy after the casino for correcting the mistake lol. What were you thinking? That you would make millions in profits from a promo? I mean common sense says no casino in the world would run a promo where they give you every week more than your deposits. Jeez... time for me to go back do some voodoo with my dolls i think i saw enough... :D

p.s.: I'm probably one, if not the biggest ally you could've found in here to fight casinos for issues of whatever kind. But what i see here is mass delusion at such a level... Really, complain and want to sue the whole world after the thousands you got paid by mistake already? Jeez that's people like you that give the casinos so much tools to fak up the real victims.
 
go look up on google total bet - winning amount for cashback and you will see what that is, your accusing a newbie who just want answers from a adr nothing more and to speak about this publicly! everyone has their opinions and have a right to it, doesn't mean their right! Anyways google cashback on total bets, and you'll get the answers!! my question has always remained the same, is it based on net wins or gross wins? UKGC website also speaks about how total bet cashbacks are calculated as well. Dude isn't this how newbies get answers by going to authority and filing a claim? like how would it work if I police officers arrested and charged people then found them guilty without taking them to court? lol!! I haven't provided all the info because honestly The Pogg investigation is pending so I don't need to! and if The Pogg says that I was wrong and then I'll take all of those eggs on my face, cook it up scrambled, with lots of ketchup! But hey I guess I would have learned something, and thats how you do it by asking questions!!!

P.S... I still play at King Billy Casino, like yesterday night all night, because I have never once had a problem with them cashing out!!!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
go look up on google total bet - winning amount for cashback and you will see what that is, your accusing a newbie who just want answers from a adr nothing more and to speak about this publicly! everyone has their opinions and have a right to it, doesn't mean their right! Anyways google cashback on total bets, and you'll get the answers!! my question has always remained the same, is it based on net wins or gross wins? UKGC website also speaks about how total bet cashbacks are calculated as well. Dude isn't this how newbies get answers by going to authority and filing a claim? like how would it work if I police officers arrested and charged people then found them guilty without taking them to court? lol!! I haven't provided all the info because honestly The Pogg investigation is pending so I don't need to! and if The Pogg says that I was wrong and then I'll take all of those eggs on my face, cook it up scrambled, with lots of ketchup! But hey I guess I would have learned something, and thats how you do it by asking questions!!!

P.S... I still play at King Billy Casino, like yesterday night all night, because I have never once had a problem with cashing out!!!
I can only presume someone made a complete balls up with your first payment.

If you sat down and thought this through properly, no casino would be able to stay in business with this kind of cash back.
 
I can only presume someone made a complete balls up with your first payment.

If you sat down and thought this through properly, no casino would be able to stay in business with this kind of cash back.

and if you looked online and researched this, maybe you can could give a better explanation, but all I see from you is picking sides and without no evidence to prove your claims and fail to show me that I was incorrect in my calculations! so honestly your opinions go way over my head!
 
Show me one site paying cashback on wagering losses instead of net loss and I'll join up there instantly and be a millionaire within a week.

The only interesting thing here is how the casino rep said it was calculated automatically, I can't see how this guy got such a big payout initially if that were the case.

Unless he'd complained and had them manually adjust for their "error".

E: although his numbers don't add up with the casino saying he only lost $250.
 
Last edited:

All the damned bits you keep showing underlined are actually proving why you are wrong.

Everyone has explained to you how it works but you seem either unwilling or unable to grasp the way cashback works.

Now 4 pages of you still trying to prove you are right.

Good luck to you on your continued quest . But like everyone has told you no casino could afford to operate the way you think it should.

Will leave you to it as no point anyone wasting anymore time trying to explain it.
 
All the damned bits you keep showing underlined are actually proving why you are wrong.

Everyone has explained to you how it works but you seem either unwilling or unable to grasp the way cashback works.

Now 4 pages of you still trying to prove you are right.

Good luck to you on your continued quest . But like everyone has told you no casino could afford to operate the way you think it should.

Will leave you to it as no point anyone wasting anymore time trying to explain it.

again another person giving their opinion about how I'm wrong and can't prove it with factual evidence! it seems like your just picking sides bud!! wouldn't be helpful in a forum discussion to provide me with evidence to support your theory?
 
again another person giving their opinion about how I'm wrong and can't prove it with factual evidence! it seems like your just picking sides bud!! wouldn't be helpful in a forum discussion to provide me with evidence to support your theory?

Are you for real. You just posted a bit that says total bets - total winnings - withdrawals . That explains why you are wrong.

You know what you have had pages of people telling you how it works and explaining it with facts. You are either trolling and taking the piss or you really cannot understand basic things you are told.

Either way i am not picking sides as if you look back i was one of the first to tell you you were wrong. But guess you probably unable to realize that.

Lol will let you waste your life posting same crap every day. Sad thing is i think you actually believe you are right.
 
Wait a minute... I think I actually agree with the op.

Reading back over it I think he's right?

He's been playing games with very low RTP apparently near 50% in his first example.
This means his total wagers vs total winnings has a huge disparity, and if it is indeed meant to be calculated as he says.. I think he's right?

It doesn't say "total deposits", it says "total bets".

E: although his numbers don't jive with the casino saying he only lost $250
 
Wait a minute... I think I actually agree with the op.

Reading back over it I think he's right?

He's been playing games with very low RTP apparently near 50% in his first example.
This means his total wagers vs total winnings has a huge disparity, and if it is indeed meant to be calculated as he says.. I think he's right?

It doesn't say "total deposits", it says "total bets".

E: although his numbers don't jive with the casino saying he only lost $250

Deposits are irrelevant so is the RTP of games.

No matter what way you look at it if the cashback is say 10% of all bets - winnings then no matter how long you play and whatever you play if your starting balance was 1000 the most you can lose would be 1000 and cashback would be max 100.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Meister Ratings

Back
Top