Your test wouldn't disprove the poster's hypothesis that it's rigged, though. It could be rigged as he suggests yet still give the correct long-term payout percentage. Not saying it is, though the more I play on it the more it does seem to play in wild swings during which you can predict outcomes & normal probabilities go out the window. Yeah, I know... why would they rig it when there's a house edge anyway, they'd lose a fortune if it was exploitable etc. etc. - it's an old argument where you can take either side (they'd rig it to increase the return - they'd lose less to those exploiting it than they gain from extra revenue from normal patterns of play etc.).Gluten said:No offence but you sound like you just lost some money at a MG casino...
Do a search for 'rigged' and read up on that and see if you still think MG is rigging their casinos. Next, play 5000 hands and record the outcomes - then present it here with proof.
In my experience MG is up to par what is expected. That is, try depositing 500$ and set autoplay for 9999 hands, then record the final result. It should be around 464 if playing Vegas Strip BJ.
spearmaster said:... followed almost immediately by this one, where I actually DID hit the minimum payout for 5 spins at 3x...
That's the best screenshot I've EVER seen! :notworthySimmo! said:Count yourself lucky Spear....
I'd still try to withdraw it, most they can do is say no. I just recently did a cashin at a casino with a bonus that, according to the T&C, was sticky and they gave it to me. Nothing ventured...ergopro said:Sitting there with over 1K- and can withdraw 50$..
OUCH! Great way to lose a quick $175.caruso said:I didn't take into account the Microgaming RNG (rigged number generator).
It's made to look that way, isn't i?Bruce Hamilton said:OUCH! Great way to lose a quick $175.
It is an external link.caruso said:I wish the forum software didn't accept attachments that blow the threads sideways and make them unreadable.
You should really stop doing this.caruso said:I originally made this thread for BS Microgaming blackjack suckouts on redeposits, as a possible indicator of foul play. You can prove little because there's no more than one hand ever played, but anyway, getting back on track:
This was the "Welcome back from Vegas" that Jupiter Club gave me. A good soft double on my $175 bet - A4 v. 6 - so I redeposited another $175 to cover it. I actually pulled a helpful card, looked good. Dealer pulled a 6, for ten, but then a 4, for 14 - so looking even better.
But then, I didn't take into account the Microgaming RNG (rigged number generator).
The problem is that your picture was too wide and messed up the page.ergopro said:I'm totally sorry if this wasn't made available for all of you...I got 8megs/2megs and it shows just fine...it was to show all of you what happens when 10$ free chip turns into a nightmare with 50$ max.cashout.
Over 4K showing- and thinking that the software knows when to hit lol =) =) =)
LOL, thanks for the fatherly advice, Voice Of Reason.GrandMaster said:You should really stop doing this.
ergopro said:what happens when 10$ free chip turns into a nightmare with 50$ max.cashout.
Over 4K showing- and thinking that the software knows when to hit lol =) =) =)