People, at least those who have names in colour, DO know what grey-zone means, yes?
If they don't by now they should probably be doing a bit of site refresh
Here's the thing..there are hundreds, if not thousands of posts and threads where we as members, are told, and tell others, what accreditation means - that a casino has been throroughly reviewed by members and staff, gone through the Baptism By Fire and come out the other side, and in all likeihood, if you abide by the casino's rules, you should be right as rain; and if issues arise, there's generally a rep to reach out, and should it come to it, there's PABs.
We know not to touch not recommended and rogue (people still do) and that if something is flagged as grey-zone, ther it's all rather up in the air. Maybe some members had good experiences, maybe some had bad, maybe there's not enough information that has yet passed through to make a determination...ergo it's on the PLAYER to choose to go in or not.
Bryan isnt here to hold anyone's hands. Everyone here is an adult.
Me? I dont touch casinos that arent accredited. Some will take any bonus going. Some try because they want to try, or help or w/e.
But it's grey-zoned...go in eyes wide open (or not at all).
If....IF....you do, then feedback is appreciated so everyone else has a better understanding.
Reviews can be tweaked or reflect accordingly.
The terms are listed. Members have pointed out egregious ones.
There's pages of players saying stay away.
I fail to see, what people don't understand by grey-zone
