Casinos By Status
Popular Filters
By Banking Options
All Games
Popular Bonus Filters
Popular Forums
Forum User Features
Recent Forum Threads
Submit A Complaint (PAB)
PAB Rules and Guidelines
Browse PABs
Popular News Sections
Recent News
paul02085 said:Looks like it is a new one thank u original poster. Can somebody please decipher these T&C's for the sign up bonus please?
Link Removed (invalid URL)
Geez i am getting too old to try to figure these things out.
Grand Monaco audits cash-ins to determine if winnings are a result of promotion abuse even though wagering is compliant with the standard terms and conditions.
In the event the casino deems a player to have abused the promotional match offer without demonstrating any degree of play with personal funds, or where a player attempts a large wager(s) with the bonus funds in an attempt to circumvent the wager requirements so that a cash-in can occur despite the bonus system standard conditions, then the casino reserves the right to deny the cash-in and reverse the amounts won as it relates to the bonus amount. The winning funds associated with the bonus amount may be considered void. The redemption of all further promotional offers will be suspended. For example, if a player makes a $100 purchase and qualifies for a match of $100, then makes one $200 wager on blackjack, then this activity will be considered an abuse of the promotional funds and a cash-in may be reversed.
A players Cash account may be cashed out at any time.
Except they just give that as an example - so any playing strategy which improves player chances might be considered abuse.vinylweatherman said:They have at least specified the "sticky bonus technique" they are looking out for rather than give a general term.
Agreed with that. It's absurd when casinos aren't just restricting games but are also telling you how you have to play them. They need to remember the whole appeal of casinos is attempting to beat the house with whatever strategy you can come up with (of course traditionally you end up paying for the house!).vinylweatherman said:It would be far better to get rid of this term and use the software to implement what is desired.
"Syndicates" are something of an on-line casino myth. If you're going to play a lot of offers all that matters is the ev. Individual results even out over time, so there's no need to team up with anyone else. Info's shared, of course, but getting into messy financial arrangements with near strangers isn't appealing.vinylweatherman said:The scope for syndicate abuse is obvious, $100 profit per two players (give or take a few bucks).
Vesuvio said:Except they just give that as an example - so any playing strategy which improves player chances might be considered abuse.