1. By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies .This website or its third-party tools use cookies, which are necessary to its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy.Find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Dismiss Notice
  3. Follow Casinomeister on Twitter | Facebook | YouTube | Casinomeister.us US Residents Click here! |  Svenska Svenska | 
Dismiss Notice
REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do diddly squat without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view most discussions: you can't make contact with thousands of fellow players, affiliates, casino reps, and all sorts of other riff-raff.

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Casinomeister here!

New info on internet gambling

Discussion in 'Online Casinos' started by marasta, Apr 8, 2005.

    Apr 8, 2005
  1. marasta

    marasta Dormant account

    Location:
    NW USA
    U.S. Internet Gambling Restrictions Can Stand as U.S. Wins Key Issues in WTO Dispute
    Office of the U.S. Trade Representative ^ | 7. April 2005 | press release


    Posted on 04/07/2005 10:26:27 AM PDT by 1rudeboy


    WASHINGTON - The United States won an important victory today when the World Trade Organization (WTO) Appellate Body sided with the United States on key issues in a challenge to U.S. laws on internet gambling.


    "This win confirms what we knew from the start WTO Members are entitled to maintain restrictions on internet gambling," said Acting U.S. Trade Representative Peter F. Allgeier. "We are pleased that the Appellate Body has agreed with our position that the U.S. gambling laws at issue here protect public order and public morals. By reversing key aspects of a deeply flawed panel report, the Appellate Body has affirmed that WTO Members can protect the public from organized crime and other dangers associated with Internet gambling. This is also a victory for the federal and state law enforcement officers and regulators who protect the public from illegal gambling and its associated risks of money laundering and organized crime."


    "U.S. restrictions on internet gambling can be maintained," Allgeier said. "This report essentially says that if we clarify U.S. internet gambling restrictions in certain ways, well be fine."


    The Appellate Body found that the concerns addressed by the three U.S. federal gambling laws at issue in this dispute "fall within the scope of public morals and/or public order" under an exception to WTO rules for trade in services. It merely found that, for this exception to apply, the United States needs to clarify one narrow issue concerning internet gambling on horse racing. USTR will be exploring possible avenues for addressing this finding. USTR will not ask Congress to weaken U.S. restrictions on internet gambling.


    The next step in the process is for the WTOs Dispute Settlement Body to formally adopt the panel and Appellate Body reports within 30 days. There is no further appeal.


    Background


    This dispute concerns Antiguas allegation that U.S. state and federal laws prohibiting the cross-border supply of gambling services (e.g., Internet and telephone gambling) are inconsistent with U.S. obligations and our schedule of specific commitments under the General Agreement on Trade in Services ("GATS"). Antigua argued that the United States violated the market access provisions of the GATS by barring supply of gambling services on a cross-border basis such as supply of gambling services by Internet from Antigua-based websites.


    The Panel released a final report to the parties on May 25, 2004. The parties suspended the panel proceedings for settlement negotiations from June through October 2004. The final panel report was made public on November 10, 2004.


    In todays report, the Appellate Body reversed key aspects of the panels finding that U.S. federal laws did not meet the requirements for application of WTO exceptions for "public morals" and "public order." As a result, the Appellate Body found that U.S. laws qualify for these exceptions, except that the United States must clarify a narrow issue relating to Internet gambling on horse racing. The Appellate Body also found that Antigua failed to prove that any of the state laws at issue were inconsistent with WTO rules. However, the Appellate Body found that the United States made a GATS market access commitment for gambling services during the Uruguay Round.
     
  2. Apr 8, 2005
  3. largeeyes

    largeeyes Dormant account

    Occupation:
    Engineer
    Location:
    North America
    You should really read the ruling. Talk about weak. It ends something like this panel recommends that it is suggested to the united states that they rethink their policy.
     
  4. Apr 8, 2005
  5. casinogossip

    casinogossip Banned User - too annoying

    Occupation:
    Your Job? Something you love.
    Location:
    My house - middle of my street
    public morals and/or public order :what:

    "In its 138-page report, the appeals panel said the United States had demonstrated that the 1961 Wire Communications Act -- which was written to cover sports betting by telephone and has been used to prosecute some Web site operators -- "was necessary to protect public morals or maintain public order.""

    "was written to cover sports by telephone" and in 1961 to boot ... HOW is that relevant? :rolleyes:
     
    Last edited: Apr 8, 2005
  6. Apr 8, 2005
  7. JohnGalt

    JohnGalt Dormant account

    Location:
    iugljk
    The Wire Act is the new mail fraud- anyone can be convicted of violating it... ANYONE. It's often used by the feds to take down people they don't like because of political affiliation or behavior.
     
  8. Apr 8, 2005
  9. YuraK

    YuraK Webmaster webmeister

    Occupation:
    webmaster
    Location:
    Russia
    Lol headline from eGaming Review said quite contrary :)

    Antigua wins final WTO appeal
    Antigua won its battle with the US over cross-border gambling today when the World Trade Organisation dismissed the US' appeal and ruled in favour of the tiny Caribbean island.
     

Share This Page