Resolved Need advice on iNetBet - don't want to lose 6k from one spin :(

Status
Not open for further replies.

dunover

Unofficial T&C's Editor
Staff member
webmeister
PABnonaccred
PABnononaccred
CAG
mm3
Joined
May 22, 2012
Location
the bus shelter, opposite GCHQ Benhall
A decent resolution, discretion applied. My only contribution is to say that the game is misleading in appearance and this down to RTG rather then the operator, but to avoid this issue recurring perhaps they should put a transfer over the game thumbnail 'Board Game' or something or a line in the text under it mentioning bonus ineligibility. Well, until RTG or they have a solution to prevent all ineligible games when a bonus is in play.

This has clearly been a unique and strenuous case and I'm sure most members here will appreciate the work done behind the scenes by all parties to produce this outcome. :)
 

mfrasher

Dormant Account
PABaccred
PABnonaccred
PABnononaccred2
Joined
Nov 7, 2017
Location
California
Greetings All,

Bryan has graciously opened the thread back up so we could add final statements here. I think its a classy move on his part, and I feel its necessary to express the my gratitude to many parties here.

First - the community here. You guys are fabulous, beyond what words can describe. I've never seen an online community come together like this before. I owe each and everyone of you a sincere "thank you". So many of you had my back, even though you didn't know me .... I appreciate it more than you know...

Second - Bryan and the CM team. They took some heat over this whole ordeal, but at the end of the day, they were trying to do what they thought/think is right. They can't be faulted for their intentions. I don't agree with everything that was said, and you all know I wasn't happy about how I was portrayed. But at the end of the day, I recognize that Max and Bryan were just trying to find a healthy resolution to this that was fair to everyone. And they did it free of charge.

The integrity of this site came into question, and I personally don't think it was warranted. Their response to this situation speaks volumes to their character and this website's integrity in my opinion. I also owe them my gratitude.

Finally - iNetBet. I would be a hypocrite if I didn't also acknowledge that they did (what I believe is...) the right thing in the end. I said I was an advocate of 2nd chances, so I'll be the first to give them one.

Again, thank you everyone. I'm humbled by the responses, this community, and all the help I received.
 

paul7388

Ueber Meister
MM
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Location
glasgow scotland
Glad it was resolved and player got paid.

I know what you are saying Bryan and whilst i can understand all the reasons behind it it is going to be one case where most members did not agree with original decision. Maybe just the way player got banned and the constant reviewing etc. made it look worse.

Anyway just because this one time majority of members disagreed it does not mean in any way that we do not appreciate the help you and Max offer daily.

As for apoligising for disagreeing. I thought it was an unfair decision and still think original decision was. I will apoligise if it came across wrong when i said that to me it was against the standards of fair play. So apoligies there. But i cant say sorry for saying i think that it was wrong player never got paid in first place as i still believe he should have and will always stand by that


Anyway thanks for at least reviewing it several times and coming to a deal that everyone will agree was fair.:thumbsup:
 

Savatage79

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2016
Location
Pittsburgh
For me it was simply how the situation went from 0 to 100 so quick in that he was this huge liar and we've denied his request and banned him, that was not a good display no matter how anyone diced it.

But glad to see a compromise was made as that's what I had felt was most likely the best route to deduct some winnings and at least give him a decent portion of it. Glad it worked out.
 

interlog

Ueber Meister
webmeister
PABaccred
PABnonaccred
MM
Joined
Mar 29, 2015
Location
London
Glad that it got resolved to satisfaction.

As to Inetbet being out of pocket. No sympathy here. If they dealt with it better from the start, then winnings from that spin wouldn't have been returned surely and they wouldn't have been out of pocket.
 

KasinoKing

WebMeister & Slotaholic..
webmeister
PABnonaccred
CAG
MM
Joined
Aug 25, 2004
Location
Bexhill on sea, England
Great work guys maybe you's can come to Northern Ireland and sort this Brexit bollocks out lol
:lolup: Should be a piece of cake compared to sorting out iNetBet!
It's very easy anyway - all the government have to do is dig a canal along the entire length of the border so that there is water separating the 2 countries - then the UK's dealings with the Republic of Ireland will be exactly the same as the UK's dealings with France, Belgium, Germany and all the other countries in the EU... Simples. eh! ;)

I would also like to add my Kudos (pun intended :rolleyes:) to iNetBet for finally coming to a fair & reasonable decision. :thumbsup:
And of course to Bryan and Max for all their hard work behind the scenes.

KK
 

shadow123

Ueber Meister
MM
Joined
Mar 19, 2008
Location
midlands
Great work in resolving this, pleased for the player,IMO it was right he got paid.Although it got a bit bitchy its good that
comments and opinions from members played a part in this, at one stage it appeared that the decision not to pay was
final but we managed to make them think again.
 

Kerply

Dormant account
Joined
Nov 14, 2018
Location
cornwall
great news that he is being paid.

We will have to agree to disagree though about the 'paying him would not have been the right call' statement, or we will go round in circles! anyone care to start this thread again? :eek2: :laugh:

fair play to the effort put in by CM and maxd on the case
 

Jono777

Ueber Meister
CAG
mm1
mm4
Joined
May 13, 2014
Location
Wolverhampton
I know there is a LOT more to it than this and plenty of grey areas...

BUT

Bottom line, I am glad that ALL parties came out of this with some sort of satisfaction.

FWIW, Reading between the lines, 99% of the posts, I don't feel there was ever any malice or ill feeling towards CasinoMeister as a brand just as I said before an extremely unique and difficult situation, one from which hopefully we can all take something from and move forward educated and in a positive light!
 

anddi32

Meister Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2018
Location
Finland
Right decision. Always nice to see some flexibility from the casino side.

And I really hope especially new players will read this topic and learn:

If you accidentally violate the terms:
1. Immediately STOP playing
2. CONTACT the casino
3. Continue playing AFTER casino's response that everything is all right

Good work CM!
 

Savatage79

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2016
Location
Pittsburgh
Now, can we ask inetbet to take the whammy off my account so I can actually win something again? :p

Matthew-McConaughey.gif
 
Last edited:

CasinoNinja

Non-Gambler
Joined
Apr 27, 2017
Location
UK
Well done to everyone involved at least this resulted in a happy ending and I'm glad InetBet sorted it, just hope they mark that board game better or block it next time.
And I don't think anyone was faulting CM or Max here, but frustration came to mind (including mine) when you saw what had happened so seemingly innocent.

But again, well done to CM and Max!

One thing that maybe could be improved on this end though if it's true, is to increase the PAB text size when submitting, having to shrink it would potentially ommit key information when you want as much as possible surely, and 256 characters can't always be enough. Just a few thoughts.. :)
 

sueyh

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2014
Location
New Zealand
This is a great news. Inetbet is doing right thing here.

Of course the biggest credit should go to Bryan and Maxd for working hard to resolve it, but I believe some of credit should go CM members here for fighting really hard for OP when they don't get anything from resolving this issue. I am really proud of being a part of this community.
Well done everyone!
 

deaconk78

Full Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2018
Location
United Kingdom
delighted for @mfrasher of course !

BUT i'd like to say i am delighted for @maxd and @Casinomeister because IF all information was correct and bob on in the first instance then they could have avoided several reviews but in the end they have managed to arrive at what seems a fair solution .

the piece of false information about a chat that never took place is what made a lot of people angry but we cannot doubt the integrity of the staff here because @maxd disclosed that information to us and then informed us that it was not correct .

i wonder if @mfrasher will spend their winnings on banana jones ? :laugh::eek: ..... spend it on your family and have a great xmas !

@ChopleyIOM charges about $5500 per video ! :p (invoice in the post!)
 

Broke

Experienced Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2009
Location
Finland
Happy ending after all. And kudos to iNetBet for making the more popular decision (from players perspective).

Now about this jackpot mfrasher won, I don't want to put blame on anyone or be rude, or try to put iNetBet or Bryan in bad light, but i'v been speculating this inside my head since last night and this forum is for discussion and sharing toughts so...

RTG casinos have two kind of jackpots. RTG network wide pooled progressive jackpot slots (see the image attached) that usually are unplayable and restricted with bonus money, jackpot amounts are hundreds of thousands dollars. And these jackpots of course come from RTG. There are not many, maybe 6 slots that are listed as progressive jackpot slots.

And then there is cavalcade of normal slots, which each one of them have in-built casino spesific jackpot. And those jackpots are almost like in Wolf Gold except that the amount is varying depending how often it is won on that slot. Because those jackpots are casino specific and each slot has it's own "jackpot", does RTG really pay these? Or the casino? They are not RTG-network wide or even casino group wide jackpots, but casino spesific, so in my head it would not make much sense if the jackpot money would come from RTG instead of the casino.

I have no fact and this is just speculation of mine. I tried to Google, but could not find any info.
 

Attachments

  • progressive jackpots.jpg
    progressive jackpots.jpg
    172.2 KB · Views: 16
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Top