Muslim Who Raped 13 Year Old UK Girl Spared Jail...

[dunover]

Such failures create a feeling of indignation towards immigrants, which can evolve over time into outright hatred and actual attacks on people purely because they are of similar race, culture, or religion to the "hate figures". In the past, this has opened the door to the radical right wing groups such as Fashist movements like the former Nazi regime, and more modern neo-Nazi groups that follow beliefs that only just fall short of full blown eugenics. UK parties like the BNP (National Front in disguise) call for forced deportation of all those of a different race to the originating white Anglo-Saxon Brits (themselves the product of a multicultural mix from 1000 years ago). They even expect those born here to "go home".

We now have the EDF, which seems to target the Asian and Islamic communities with a message that they should convert to the accepted Western ideals, or go to a country that better suits them.

Immigrants in general are targetted due to the perceived "special treatment" they get, which mostly means being fast tracked to the front of the queue for many services that native Brits have to wait in line for because of a national shortage.

The problem is not immigrants themselves, it is the governments' failure to deal with the problems created properly, and make sure than EVERYONE gets treated fairly. This means that a law is a law, and if one breaks it, one is judged and sentenced without regard to their race or religion. Generally, "ignorance is no defence" in law, so pleading that "I didn't know it was wrong" should not in itself result in a more lenient sentence in those cases where the law in question is "obvious", such as rape, robbery, kidnap, etc.

In effect, this looks like a paedophile using the "she wanted it" defence when caught, and this would not normally save them from a custodial sentence - if anything, it could INCREASE the sentence as it demonstrates that their ignorance presents a danger to the public should they be released.

The judge has now created a PR storm, and there may be pressure to explain this decision.

The UK now has a system where an appeal can be made when a sentence is considered to have been too lenient. In the past, only the criminal could appeal on the grounds that a sentence was too harsh.

This is one of the most disingenuous lines that is continuously reeled out by apologists for multiculturalism. Almost as ridiculous as those who state 'we fought a war against Nazism' NO! we didn't - we fought a war against an EXPANSIONIST GERMANY who happened to be run by National Socialists. A diiferent thing altogether. Franco in Spain ruled until he died in 1975, simply because unlike his buddy Adolf and chum Mussolini, he kept his ideas and affairs inside his own borders. The ONLY war we the UK really fought both militarily and ideologically (ironically similarly to Hitler) against an ideal was that against Communism. My Grandad served in Malaya and Burma after WWII where his jungle troop was actively hunting down, and executing those carrying 'the little red book'. this little-known and brutal campaign saved much of SE Asia from communism eventually. Communism, in its relatively short existence of around a century has killed and murdered to date nigh on 100 millions. Hitler was a pretty third-division nutjob when it came to genocide. His infamy came from obviously targeting Jews, who are to this day dominant in the media worldwide. We hear little of the slaughter perpetrated under Marxism/Communism on a far greater scale perhaps because these are intially Jewish ideologies. That's why if I wear a t-shirt with a Communist red star or other logo nobody bats an eyelid. If I wore one with a swastika I'd be lifted by the UK Stasi.
Anyway, I digress. The Norman (Norsman) conquest in 1066 was made from areas of N.Europe namely Gaul which had been 200 years under Viking rule and settlement, as was much of coastal and N.England until Stamford Bridge. Most of the invaders were of similar heritage to many of those living in Britain anyway. Depsite the 1066 invasion most Saxon names of villages and towns remained and over a period of time after the feudal system was established, the Saxon language and traditions became dominant again and still remain (precariously) until now.
The reason I say that statement is disingenuous and misleading is because we (were) here in the UK a mixture of peoples and cultures yes, but almost entirely coming from Northern and Mid Europe where the peoples and cultures were broadly similar, and wars tended to be about land expansion and feudal power.
To class third-world immigration under the term 'multiculturalsm' in the same context as historical 'multiculturalism' having occurred 1500-1000 years ago which was in global terms 'local' is a complete nonsense but a nonsense all too commonly spouted by PC liberals or those who have been brainswashed by them.
The huge differences in today's colonists and those of 1000-1500 years ago, and the sheer scale of the colonization are readily and craftily glossed over in order to excuse their failures.

 

[manuels58]

This is one of the most disingenuous lines that is continuously reeled out by apologists for multiculturalism. Almost as ridiculous as those who state 'we fought a war against Nazism' NO! we didn't - we fought a war against an EXPANSIONIST GERMANY who happened to be run by National Socialists. A diiferent thing altogether. Franco in Spain ruled until he died in 1975, simply because unlike his buddy Adolf and chum Mussolini, he kept his ideas and affairs inside his own borders. The ONLY war we the UK really fought both militarily and ideologically (ironically similarly to Hitler) against an ideal was that against Communism. My Grandad served in Malaya and Burma after WWII where his jungle troop was actively hunting down, and executing those carrying 'the little red book'. this little-known and brutal campaign saved much of SE Asia from communism eventually. Communism, in its relatively short existence of around a century has killed and murdered to date nigh on 100 millions. Hitler was a pretty third-division nutjob when it came to genocide. His infamy came from obviously targeting Jews, who are to this day dominant in the media worldwide. We hear little of the slaughter perpetrated under Marxism/Communism on a far greater scale perhaps because these are intially Jewish ideologies. That's why if I wear a t-shirt with a Communist red star or other logo nobody bats an eyelid. If I wore one with a swastika I'd be lifted by the UK Stasi.
Anyway, I digress. The Norman (Norsman) conquest in 1066 was made from areas of N.Europe namely Gaul which had been 200 years under Viking rule and settlement, as was much of coastal and N.England until Stamford Bridge. Most of the invaders were of similar heritage to many of those living in Britain anyway. Depsite the 1066 invasion most Saxon names of villages and towns remained and over a period of time after the feudal system was established, the Saxon language and traditions became dominant again and still remain (precariously) until now.
The reason I say that statement is disingenuous and misleading is because we (were) here in the UK a mixture of peoples and cultures yes, but almost entirely coming from Northern and Mid Europe where the peoples and cultures were broadly similar, and wars tended to be about land expansion and feudal power.
To class third-world immigration under the term 'multiculturalsm' in the same context as historical 'multiculturalism' having occurred 1500-1000 years ago which was in global terms 'local' is a complete nonsense but a nonsense all too commonly spouted by PC liberals or those who have been brainswashed by them.
The huge differences in today's colonists and those of 1000-1500 years ago, and the sheer scale of the colonization are readily and craftily glossed over in order to excuse their failures.

I won't refer to your historical and personal ideas (which I agree with mostly), cause that would be to do in another context.

I just would like to point out that nowadays we are living a globalisation era, which is "decreasing" the size of the world so much that the migration of peoples is much easier and most of the times uncontrolled.

In view of the several problems raised in this thread, this simply means that those most "advanced" countries which are "globalising" the world are not doing it the right way.

 

[Reefer]

man this country is fked
How that judge can return such a verdict is beyond me
I hope it comes back and rapes him in his wigged up ass