1. By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies .This website or its third-party tools use cookies, which are necessary to its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy.Find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Dismiss Notice
  3. Follow Casinomeister on Twitter | Facebook | YouTube | Casinomeister.us US Residents Click here! |  Svenska Svenska | 
Dismiss Notice
REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do diddly squat without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view most discussions: you can't make contact with thousands of fellow players, affiliates, casino reps, and all sorts of other riff-raff.

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Casinomeister here!

More anti-online gambling action in Sweden

Discussion in 'Casino Industry Discussion' started by jetset, Sep 11, 2007.

    Sep 11, 2007
  1. jetset

    jetset Ueber Meister CAG

    Senior Partner, InfoPowa News Service

    Gaming Board now demands information from Redbet

    The Lotteriinspektionen, Sweden's Gaming Board appears to be continuing its aggressive initiative against online gambling companies, presumably in a bid to protect the country's monopolistic bans on all but government owned gambling operations that have placed it squarely in the sights of the European Commission.

    Readers will recall previous InfoPowa reports on the Board's demand two months ago for employee information from the 24hPoker firm, and the apparently parallel activities of the Swedish tax authorities to crack down on perceived tax evasion. Now Redbet Limited is the subject of a similar demand.

    The power to demand usually private information from online gambling companies is based on Swedish laws which permit the Gaming Board to require information if it is of the opinion that a commercial entity is carrying on an illegal gambling business in the country. Such information may be required to enable the Board to establish whether significant business for the company is being conducted without authority on Swedish soil.

    Fines may be imposed for companies refusing to comply with such a request, and stiff penalties can be invoked if the Board decides that a company is providing illegal gambling services, including the promotion of gambling sites to Swedish clients.

    It is understood that the Swedish authorities are especially interested in not only the activities and assets of companies but also the number of employees a company may have in-country. Should prosecutions eventuate, these will be seminal proceedings, as there has thus far been no judicial test of the Board's decisions.

Share This Page