Title is quite self-explaining. MGA players might be able to try PnG lowest math models.
You do not have permission to view link
Log in or register now.
Casinos By Status
Popular Filters
By Banking Options
All Games
Popular Bonus Filters
Popular Forums
Forum User Features
Recent Forum Threads
Submit A Complaint (PAB)
PAB Rules and Guidelines
Browse PABs
Popular News Sections
Recent News
The 1% already decided what they saidWhere was customers voice ?
guy swears blind Reactoonz 2 is a beast of a game on 94%
I'm waiting until Videoslots bring out the 50% one, in line with their scratch cards, for the ultimate experience.Now, now, not sure I have ever declared such a thing.
Will boldly declare the 82% one you will thoroughly enjoy though![]()
I'm waiting until Videoslots bring out the 50% one, in line with their scratch cards, for the ultimate experience.
The Turkey's voted for Xmas and....Taken from the report......
'The MGA has received responses from gaming companies holding B2C and/or B2B licences as well as consultants to the gaming industry replying on behalf of various clients holding MGA’s licence. There was significant support from respondents to the consultation proposal.'
No sh*t Sherlock!
You've been playing it on 70% for the last year, 84% would be a marked improvementFFS if Bonanza was ever to play at 84% I wouldn’t have stopped playing it, I could only ever dream of the RTP being that high..
Videoslots is already at %85, saying this after I posted screenshots last night but geez it was a real slog to even get those. LOL Seriously though they turned down the RTP and weekend booster for sure.Someone posted this from the Videoslots office yesterday, wondered what it was about
![]()
The Turkey's voted for Xmas and....
Voted for the Chicken
I know: would you like increased authority to swindle?
Why, Sir, yes we would, yes we would.
These consultations or whatnot are always lob sided no matter where you are: normally a decisions already been made and they badge talking to experts at the end as trying to show they based it on x,y,z.
Sort of like when the UKGC come out with some of theirs and it ends up being they just spoke to families of problem gamblers etc as their representative sample.