Maple casino - Gangster terms?

I understand there is a time factor in these things as far as the law is concerned - a "grandfathering" factor.

What a load of crap. In most types of law, that would be called a Statute of Limitations, which is usually 30 years, not a few months.

Ask your lawyer about grandfathering terms which are in breach. That is totally absurd.
 
spearmaster said:
What a load of crap. In most types of law, that would be called a Statute of Limitations, which is usually 30 years, not a few months.

Ask your lawyer about grandfathering terms which are in breach. That is totally absurd.

It's not got anything to do with the statute of limitations in contract law.

But I will be happy to pass along your comment next time we talk. :D

It has to do with compliance, not removing their properties of my site at the time it happened.

So now I have a lot of work to do removing and replacing properties. See ya around - but a lot less until that's done.
 
webmasters, etc glad to see your "off topic" replies regularly....
but can you sometimes talk about those in different section.
Thank you.
 
Sodax77 said:
webmasters, etc glad to see your "off topic" replies regularly....
but can you sometimes talk about those in different section.
Thank you.
Ditto. Please don't derail the thread. If you would like to complain about Referback, feel free to start a thread in the complaints section or webmaster section. Referback has nothing to do with Gangsta terms at VPL :D
 
casinomeister said:
Ditto. Please don't derail the thread. If you would like to complain about Referback, feel free to start a thread in the complaints section or webmaster section. Referback has nothing to do with Gangsta terms at VPL :D

Was this sarcastic comment?

Mine was. I'm so bored to read, when webmasters start their "fight"/"off topic posts" at wrong topic (regularly). That i mean with my post :)
 
No, I didn't mean to sound sarcastic. "Ditto" means I agree with you. I meant that the webmaster issue (Referback's terms and conditions) should be discussed somewhere else, and not dominate this thread. I'm trying to keep things organized, that's all. :D
 
And to get back on track, nothing has changed at Maple Casino so far... The Tony Soprano terms are still in effect...
 
trick said:
And to get back on track, nothing has changed at Maple Casino so far... The Tony Soprano terms are still in effect...
I'm not here to make excuses for Maple Casino, but I was under the impression that these were going to be removed. I'm thinking their webmaster didn't upload the change yet.
 
chucho said:
Maple Hood Casino. That shit is straight up gangster, which should not shock anyone considering that BThug is the owner/operator.


WTF?? He may be alot of things... but a casino owner/operator isn't one of them.
 
T & C change...

Hi All,

We are curerntly waiting for eCogra to review and approve the term change.

Please note that this term has been on VPL casinos since the first day that Crazy Vegas was launched, and was not a recent change.

It should hopefully be changed by the end of today.

Regards
VPL
 
As strange as it seems, this just goes to show you how few players actually read the terms and conditions carefully - or, at least in the case of Casinomeister readers.

I for one believe this term may well have been included since day one - might even have read it myself but kind of discounted it.

We'll wait for the good news. But now you have another issue you had better prepare to deal with, and this issue IS recent and about to become very hot. So perhaps you need to put out the embers before they flare up. I presume you know what I am talking about so I'll not bring it up any further.
 
New Term

Hi All,

This term has been changed.

It now reads :

Personal information supplied at the time of registration or at any time thereafter will only be used for the purpose of determining the legitimacy of account registrations and activity. Vegas Partner Lounge will keep all personal account information relating to the player confidential, save that Vegas Partner Lounge may disclose information where required by law to appropriate authorities for the prevention and detection of crime or any other duly authorised purpose of any public authority, or pursuant to the order of any competent court. Where applicable Vegas Partner Lounge may also convey personal and account information to a third party for use in the recovery of any sums owed to Vegas Partner Lounge by the player.

I hope this seems fair to all parties.

Regards
VPL
 
VPL said:
Hi All,

This term has been changed.

It now reads :

Personal information supplied at the time of registration or at any time thereafter will only be used for the purpose of determining the legitimacy of account registrations and activity. Vegas Partner Lounge will keep all personal account information relating to the player confidential, save that Vegas Partner Lounge may disclose information where required by law to appropriate authorities for the prevention and detection of crime or any other duly authorised purpose of any public authority, or pursuant to the order of any competent court. Where applicable Vegas Partner Lounge may also convey personal and account information to a third party for use in the recovery of any sums owed to Vegas Partner Lounge by the player.

I hope this seems fair to all parties.

Regards
VPL

that is very fair and i'm sure everyone else think so the same, also is very complient with the particular laws in the UK i mentioned earlier in this thread, so one question did you google like i did to come up with that? or did you pay that fancy lawyer of yours to do that for you?
 
Encouraging to see good sense and fairness prevailing at last - now this business of the retroactrive affiliate changes needs to be addressed and we can all get on with it.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Meister Ratings

Back
Top