1. By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies .This website or its third-party tools use cookies, which are necessary to its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy.Find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Dismiss Notice
  3. Follow Casinomeister on Twitter | Facebook | YouTube | Casinomeister.us US Residents Click here! |  Svenska Svenska | 
Dismiss Notice
REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do diddly squat without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view most discussions: you can't make contact with thousands of fellow players, affiliates, casino reps, and all sorts of other riff-raff.

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Casinomeister here!

Manhattan Slots (CWC): Should I be suspicious of their SicBo?

Discussion in 'Online Casinos' started by milemaster, Feb 9, 2012.

    Feb 9, 2012
  1. milemaster

    milemaster Senior Member

    Occupation:
    Ego Enhancement Consultant
    Location:
    Yarnbombing, Phlugerstan
    I always like to play SicBo for a few rolls after a nice run on the slots. Generally I just wager on High(11 thru 17) or Low(4 thru 10) rather than individual numbers.

    Of the 370 rolls of the dice in the last 30 days, 81% (289 times of 370 rolls) of them came up Low (4-10). Naturally most of my bets were on the "high" value so I was on the losing end of that percentage. The longest streak was 11 times in a row. This isn't over one session, but many over the course of the last 30 days.

    What is your experience playing SicBo at the CWC casinos?
     
  2. Feb 9, 2012
  3. Nifty29

    Nifty29 Dormant account

    Occupation:
    PAID CASINO SHILL
    Location:
    Turn right, then right. then right again
    I would say that 370 rolls is an incredibly small sample, and hence just about anything is possible even in a fair game.

    I would also suggest that if the streak was in your favour, we wouldn't be reading. It's nothing personal, just human nature I.e. we forget about the amazing good runs because we think we "deserve" it, but we find the horrible runs difficult to accept and only then do some question the integrity of the software. In fact, we should see just as many threads challenging game fairness as a result of good runs, but of course we don't.
     

Share This Page