1. By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies .This website or its third-party tools use cookies, which are necessary to its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy.Find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Follow Casinomeister on Twitter | Facebook | YouTube | Casinomeister.us US Residents Click here! |  Svenska Svenska | 
Dismiss Notice
REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do diddly squat without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view most discussions: you can't make contact with thousands of fellow players, affiliates, casino reps, and all sorts of other riff-raff.

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Casinomeister here!

Making money in Congress

Discussion in 'The Attic' started by jetset, Nov 16, 2011.

    Nov 16, 2011
  1. jetset

    jetset Ueber Meister CAG

    Occupation:
    Senior Partner, InfoPowa News Service
    Location:
    Earth
    Did anyone see the "Sixty Minutes" program last Sunday?

    It featured an interesting look at how politicians in the US Congress can make significant amounts of money on stock deals based on "non-public information" available to them as members of various committees, and names both Democrats and Republicans who have scored because of the manner in which conflict of interest rules for politicians have been framed.

    Among those named as making money in such deals is online gambling's arch enemy, Alabama Rep. Spencer Bachus, who is now apparently under some pressure following the Sixty Minutes expose.


    You must register/login in order to see the link.

    I've watched some clips from the program and the politicians approached seemed evasive to say the least.

    I was impressed with now retired Representative Brian Baird, who detailed attempts he made to pass HR1148, a measure which would make stock trades by politicians made on "non-public" information illegal. He was unable to get it through, and it remains buried in Congress. One of the positives to already come out of the program is an undertaking by other politicians to resurrect Baird's bill.
     
    3 people like this.
  2. Nov 16, 2011
  3. Casinomeister

    Casinomeister Forum Cheermeister Staff Member

    Occupation:
    Homemaker
    Location:
    Bierland
    What a great read. And unfortunately, there's not much that can be done about it. I mean if a congressman is not allowed to trade on non-public info, there's no reason that he wouldn't tell his cousin to invest here or there.

    And Bacchus...something makes me think he believes the world is only six thousand years old. :rolleyes:
     
  4. Nov 16, 2011
  5. jetset

    jetset Ueber Meister CAG

    Occupation:
    Senior Partner, InfoPowa News Service
    Location:
    Earth
    He's certainly well positioned to obtain all sorts of "non-public" information too, having taken over the chair of the House Financial Services Committee...
     
  6. Nov 16, 2011
  7. Mousey

    Mousey Ueber Meister Mouse CAG

    Occupation:
    Pencil Pusher
    Location:
    Up$hitCreek
    I missed the 60 Minutes, but I have been reading about it. Funny though.... no one of us is surprised? LOL

    And Bachus.... the man is an embarrassment to my state and I cannot even tell you the horror I felt when he was made chairman of the FSC.... :eek:

    online gambling is ee-ville, but insider stock trading (I don't care what they call it, that's what it is, IMO) is just one of the perks of being in congress.... grrrrrr.....
     
  8. Nov 16, 2011
  9. rockycatt

    rockycatt meistercatt CAG MM

    Occupation:
    carpenter
    Location:
    Boston
    and i suppose that dragging there feet on issues now makes sence to those interested in the mechanics of stock cheating

    also i believe its law or close to it that when a president goes into office his wall street type activities are to go into a blind trust
     
  10. Nov 16, 2011
  11. rockycatt

    rockycatt meistercatt CAG MM

    Occupation:
    carpenter
    Location:
    Boston
    here is a perfect example how money gets processed they got goooooood processers

    URBANDALE, Iowa — Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich has acknowledged receiving personal compensation from Freddie Mac, the federally backed housing agency, but says he doesn't know exactly how much he was paid.

    The former House speaker left open the possibility that his consulting firm received between $1.6 million and $1.8 million. Gingrich says he received a portion of that for providing "strategic advice for a long period of time" after he left Congress.

    That amount is significantly higher than the $300,000 figure Gingrich was questioned about last week.

    Gingrich spoke with reporters in Iowa on Wednesday. He defended Freddie Mac's role and said every American should be interested in expanding housing opportunities. The federally backed mortgage lender has become a focal point of anti-government sentiment because of the housing crisis.
     
  12. Nov 17, 2011
  13. jetset

    jetset Ueber Meister CAG

    Occupation:
    Senior Partner, InfoPowa News Service
    Location:
    Earth
    Makes you wonder whether some politicians are currently making investments based on the possible US legalisation of online poker:rolleyes:
     
  14. Nov 17, 2011
  15. rockycatt

    rockycatt meistercatt CAG MM

    Occupation:
    carpenter
    Location:
    Boston
    with all the humane things to conquer this douchebag takes 1.8 mill and gets amnesia about it . i can see why when theres a armed revolution
    the firing squads get cracking
     
    1 person likes this.
  16. Nov 22, 2011
  17. P.V.

    P.V. Senior Member webmeister

    Occupation:
    Make money!
    Location:
    Turn around...
    We should be watching. ;)
     

Share This Page