Main Street Group confusing terms!

Dissolved company.

I have just sent a PM to Summer Blair (Main street rep), as this issue of the disolved company named as handling transactions needs urgent attention as this looks bad for the casinos.
I believe this is probably a case of failure to keep the websites up to date, and is unlikely to be related to the issue of the 5% fees.
As this is the weekend, Summer may not be able to comment till Monday.
Bryan has a lot of catching up to do, and I am sure will get involved should it prove neccessary.

It might be worth checking the company records to see if a reason for the entry "dissolved" can be found, it is not always the case that a dissolved company has gone bust, or been closed by the authorities. It can be simply a corporate manouever, such as to minimise tax, create losses against taxes, or a takeover by another company.
 
vinylweatherman said:
I have just sent a PM to Summer Blair (Main street rep), as this issue of the disolved company named as handling transactions needs urgent attention as this looks bad for the casinos.


Well, gee, its only been over six months now. How urgent can it be for Mainstreet to fix this? Obviously, its not very important to them. Talk is cheap and deeds are precious. Uh, but VWman keeps omitting that Mainstreet group is also falsely advertising who owns the casinos as well. False advertising and other misrepresentations are part of the pattern of deceit here. People are getting fooled here into thinking these are UK casinos and wagering in GB pounds is OK, and it really isn’t. Where are Mainstreet’s servers? I don’t see it listed on their websites. I don’t think they are really in the UK if they are processing all of the payments in US dollars!

I believe this is probably a case of failure to keep the websites up to date, and is unlikely to be related to the issue of the 5% fees.

Opinions are like bellybuttons. Everyone has one, but I strongly disagree. My problem here is that Mainstreet failed to disclose its bizarre policies of charging commissions on withdrawals. Even after they admitted they were wrong and edited their webpages, they still continued to falsely advertise related matters regarding how the payments are processed on the six casinos listed:
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


Again, actions speak louder than words, and I still haven’t been paid in full.

But for them to advertise as “Mainstreet Vegas ltd. registered in the UK”, and that they are owned by another UK company that process the financial transactions, AND THEN to selectively charge an undisclosed 5% commission for withdrawals in GB pounds is truly scandalous. The last time I checked those colourful pieces of paper with the Queen’s picture on them where the legal currency of the UK. This is outrageous!

I want to know to whom can I complain to about this nonsense in the UK?

The people on the new UK gaming commission should know about Mainstreet’s practices when considering them for licensing.
 
Last edited:
CROGO said:
But for them to advertise as Mainstreet Vegas ltd. registered in the UK, and that they are owned by another UK company that process the financial transactions, AND THEN to selectively charge an undisclosed 5% commission for withdrawals in GB pounds is truly scandalous. The last time I checked those colourful pieces of paper with the Queens picture on them where the legal currency of the UK. This is outrageous!
MAIN STREET VEGAS, LIMITED
WILKES PARTNERSHIP
41 CHURCH STREET
BIRMINGHAM
ENGLAND, B3 2RT
Company No. 04491288

Status: Dissolved 20/04/2004
This is getting dodgier and dodgier.
 
Complaint

Because this is a listed UK company, you can make a complaint to Trading Standards. I would suggest to the branch that deals with the registered address of the now defunct company. It does not matter if a non-UK national is being ripped off, they will take an interest as it is a UK registered comany doing the ripping off. Trading Standards could ask the company to show evidence that it really does cost them 5% to deal with the currency movements, since this is how the charge has been explained. Finding where the servers are is not too hard to do with the right software, although this really should be available to players as a matter of course. I doubt they are in the UK as there is no licencing structure as yet.
I must admit I am a little puzzled that a UK company has to charge 5% to receive and pay in UK Currency, as they must surely have some UK denominated liquid assets to handle UK players.

This may well be a case of "rules is rules" by the casino, with out regard to individual circumstances. In the long run, this attitude will mean they will not attract all the players who are willing to gamble. I note that already it seems that being unable to Drive and travel abroad can seriously affect a players ability to get paid, but what the **** has being unfit/unable to drive or travel got to do with fitness to gamble! I have even found some MG casinos where you can't even register without a drivers licence or passport, as nothing else will do.

My Father has gambled all his adult life on the horses, but as a non driver and not having a passport, could not use the internet to place bets as he would not find it easy getting paid.

I have made a cash-out from Diamond Deal, in UK, and no fees have been charged as yet, and it was to Neteller within a couple of days for the deposit refund. This has to be a case of where one lives, rather than anything to do with currency alone.
 
GrandMaster said:
MAIN STREET VEGAS, LIMITED
WILKES PARTNERSHIP
41 CHURCH STREET
BIRMINGHAM
ENGLAND, B3 2RT
Company No. 04491288

Status: Dissolved 20/04/2004
This is getting dodgier and dodgier.

Indeed!
The plot thickens:
“Please notice: Our Company is MainstreetVegas ltd. registered in the UK. All of our transactions use SSL security layer for added security.”
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


“Please notice Main Street Vegas co. of Birmingham, UK, is the cashier company acting on behalf of Diamond Deal Casino of Costa Rica. Our transactions use SSL security layer for added security.”
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


This company has been dissolved for over 2 years now!

The deceit here runs deeper than I thought!
 
Here's another one:
“Financial transactions are processed through RX Advertising Limited, 48 Bedford Road, Ruislip, Middlesex, HA4 6NA, UK; owner of this casino. Your Statement will show as: FESTIVEBINGO.COM // Birmingham”:
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
Just thought that I would mention that to trade or do business using the term 'limited', when you are not duly incorporated with limited liability is a criminal offence in the UK.
 
mmmmm

Only because the processing company that a casino uses for credit cards is stablished in the UK it doesn't mean that they are.

Check neteller for example, when you use your credit card with them, the processing company might... once again "MIGHT" not be located in Canada.

It is the most common thing that an online gambling operation changes their processing companies from time to time. So if you see that a company was dissolved, it doesn't mean that the actual casino is making fraud or something. Only that they are no longer making business with that processing company.

Instead of keep complaining... have you pm the Casinomeister? or Contact the Mainstreet group againg through the chat? I guarantee you they will do their best to help you out and bring this to an end.

By the way?? of how much money are we talking here? $500 or $15??
 
I am amazed that some people online post replies without ever reading, or understanding, what has previously been posted.

The Watchdog said:
Only because the processing company that a casino uses for credit cards is stablished in the UK it doesn't mean that they are.

(Ignoring the spelling, grammar and syntax here…) To quote Bill Clinton, “It depends what the definition of “is” is.” Very plainly, Mainstreet’s representations
1) That “Our Company is MainstreetVegas ltd. registered in the UK.”. and
2) that “Financial transactions are processed through RX Advertising Limited, 48 Bedford Road, Ruislip, Middlesex, HA4 6NA, UK; owner of this casino.”,
previously cited with weblinks to the various casinos, ARE NOT TRUE!
THE COMPANIES LISTED ON THE MAINSTREET CASINOS DO NOT EXIST!

:lolup:

As Big Mac stated, this appears to be a crime in the UK. (But just a small technicality to those in Costa Rica.) Obviously, Mainstreet has been deceiving players into depositing based upon FALSE STATEMENTS.

The Watchdog said:
Check neteller for example, when you use your credit card with them, the processing company might... once again "MIGHT" not be located in Canada.

Neither Neteller, nor Canada have any possible relevance to anything here.

The Watchdog said:
It is the most common thing that an online gambling operation changes their processing companies from time to time.

1) If an online casino advertises it is using a UK processing company for financial transactions, and names the company to induce players to deposit money and play in the casino, that company should in fact exist, and be lawfully incorporated. Since they advertised the processing as such, they had an obligation to correct the advertising once they changed companies. (Again this is a small technicality to those in Costa Rica.)
This is even more important here because the processing company is also advertised as the “owner of this casino”. This statement is also false. (And again, this fact was missed by the poster from Costa Rica.)

The Watchdog said:
So if you see that a company was dissolved, it doesn't mean that the actual casino is making fraud or something.

When an online casino advertises that it is “Mainstreet Vegas ltd. registered in the UK” and
1) that company no longer exists, and was in fact dissolved,
2) it is a criminal offense in the UK do conduct business as a Limited, (Ltd.) compay, when not lawfully incorporated and registered as such,

then the “fraud” word needs to be seriously considered when referring to its operations.

The Watchdog said:
Only that they are no longer making business with that processing company.

Very insightful! Since the processing company no longer legally exists, it obviously can no longer conduct business or own the casino. I suspect that a new processing company was formed that now owns these casinos. Since Mainstreet falsely advertised, likely illegally in the UK, a defunct company as owning it and processing financial transactions, perhaps they will tell us who really owns them now? I won’t hold my breath waiting for these ROGUES!!!

The Watchdog said:
Instead of keep complaining... have you pm the Casinomeister?

Not yet, because I was instructed to contact the Mainstreet rep here first.

The Watchdog said:
or Contact the Mainstreet group againg through the chat? I guarantee you they will do their best to help you out and bring this to an end.

Uhhh.. if you had read my previous posts, you would find Mainstreet’s refusal to make full payment posted. I really don’t take kindly to them trying to water my leg and then say “its raining!” No, its not raining here. Its now over six months and this is getting very stale.

The Watchdog said:
By the way?? of how much money are we talking here? $500 or $15??

Uhhh.. if you had read my previous posts, you find the exact figures. But for a small amount of money they have caused themselves a large problem. This should tell you something about the management here. The GrandMaster has filled in the missing information to expose Mainstreet’s false advertising here.

Was it worth if Mainstreet?

Why is Mainstreet on the approved list here instead of in the Rogue pit?
 
You know, when a casino claims that a player commits fraud they lock the account and void all winnings.

Soooo….If a casino commits fraud by violating the UK law on registering companies, illegally using “Ltd.” when not properly registered as such, and other false statements and misrepresentations, AND Neteller is a UK company subject to UK law…

THEN DOESN’T THAT MEAN THAT EVERY PLAYER WHO WAS DECEIVED INTO WAGERING AT THOSE CASINOS CAN NOW CLAIM FRAUD AND DEMAND THE REPAYMENT OF ALL LOST WAGERS FROM NETELLER?

Maybe those people who have lost money at the Mainstreet casinos should visit the links posted and take screen shots before they get changed:
“Financial transactions are processed through RX Advertising Limited, 48 Bedford Road, Ruislip, Middlesex, HA4 6NA, UK; owner of this casino. Your Statement will show as: FESTIVEBINGO.COM // Birmingham”:
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


“Please notice: Our Company is MainstreetVegas ltd. registered in the UK. All of our transactions use SSL security layer for added security.”
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


“Please notice Main Street Vegas co. of Birmingham, UK, is the cashier company acting on behalf of Diamond Deal Casino of Costa Rica. Our transactions use SSL security layer for added security.”
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
As you wish..

However I see you are determined to send them to the Rogue pit... I don't believe is going to happen...

Being one of the few playtech casino groups that work by the book, I just don't see it happening.

By the way, why don't you try contacting again and see their response? And how come this been going on for months and no solution? Either they are ignoring your complain (which I honestly don't believe is the case) or either you have not much to defend your complain with since neither them or Casinomeister have helped you out. So probably they put an end to the case since you have no further arguments and you are keep posting and fighting for something you won't win. Posting won't take you anywhere, at least thats my belief. Communicating with them will work better to see if some one is studying your case there and find a nice ending to your situation.

I am just trying to help you out, I know they are a good company and you were the one bringing this thread back to life...

Honestly, try contacting them again... they have chat service 24 hours a day... and PM Casinomeister for him to give you his opinion again.

Is not my intention to tell you that you are mistaken, only that posting and posting won't help you much if they are not paying attention to you. So the best option is keep talking with them to see what would they decide.

Sorry if you felt I was against you ... only that it seems you are determined on giving them problems..

Best wishes on your issue :thumbsup:
 
Last edited:
Cogro

I don't believe this was added recently to their TCs

All players using € (EURO) outside the Eurozone (12 countries in which euro is the official currency) or £(Great Britain Pound) outside the United Kingdom will be charged an additional 5% fee on every approved withdrawal request up to a maximum fee of €500 or £500.


I am positive their TCs have not changed in a while.

PM me, I tried to contact you... but you don't allow private messages.

I beleive that paragraph might be the reason why you are getting no where.

If you proivded a US billing address... thats the reason you were charged that fee
 
The only thing MainStreet is guilty of is not updating some of the information on their websites. Whenever their processor moves, the Ltd. is dissolved and another created. Nothing wrong with that. Their websites are being updated with this information.

By the way, I wouldn't consider listing one's business as advertising so I don't really understand why you're getting your panties tied in a knot over this.

CROGO said:
Well this complaint is NOT resolved. Mainstreet is still refusing to cough up the commission they charged me on my winnings.
From the casino:

As posted on our website, all players using € (EURO) outside the Eurozone (12 countries in which euro is the official currency) or £(Great Britain Pound) outside the United Kingdom will be charged an additional 5% fee on every approved withdrawal

This is the case of this player, he is from USA and his account is in Great Britain Pound currency.

Because of this, the fees were deducted from his withdrawals.

**The case was checked by our General Manager and we offer him the deal of crediting the amount deducted of the withdrawals as an additional bonus for a deposit eligible for the weekly bonus.

How is this not resolved? What's your problem?
 
CROGO said:
I realize the amount in dispute is not great, 15 GBP and 4 GBP, but it still annoys me.
What annoys me is the length that people go through to dis a casino that has been providing the player community a virtually complaint-free service for years. They wouldn't be listed here if I felt they were dodgy or doing weird shit to players - I really don't appreciate the calls for "roguedom."

If I understand this correctly, the casino offered to give you this difference in a bonus. I would say that's a pretty fair deal.

And all this mayhem for 19 GBP??
 
Casinomeister said:
The only thing MainStreet is guilty of is not updating some of the information on their websites. Whenever their processor moves, the Ltd. is dissolved and another created. Nothing wrong with that. Their websites are being updated with this information.
If casinos can get away with not updating their websites for two years, then players should also be able to rely on T&C that were in force two years ago.
 
GrandMaster said:
If casinos can get away with not updating their websites for two years, then players should also be able to rely on T&C that were in force two years ago.
Sorry, I disagree. Terms and conditions are key elements to a casino website and are highly focused upon. Items such as business info (that most people couldn't care less about) sometimes fall to the wayside. At Casinomeister, there are numerous pages that still have copyright 1998 - 2004 on them. That doesn't mean it's not copyrighted and it doesn't mean that info is up for grabs. It means I haven't gotten around to dealing with it yet.

But there are other sections that I am updating daily - sections that are deemed more important than others.
 
Casinomeister said:
What's your problem?

In January, I deposited and wagered in casinos that misrepresented themselves as owned by UK companies and/or located in the UK, where the pound sterling is the lawful currency. After attempting to withdrawal my winnings, the casinos charged a commission on my winnings. This commission was not disclosed on their website, and in fact would be illegal if they were in fact UK companies. They have subsequently changed their websites at least twice. So the present websites do not read the same as they did previously.

Casinomeister said:
How is this not resolved?

I still haven’t been paid, and after 6 months I should be entitled to interest.

Casinomeister said:
Terms and conditions are key elements to a casino website and are highly focused upon.

Right! Because if accepted, they can form a valid contract between the parties. If a casino wants to do “weird” things, like charging commissions on winnings, it needs to make that clear. That didn’t happen here and no judge would find that they did. Furthermore, is there a page on these websites labeled “terms and conditions”?
Try to find it!

Casinomeister said:
Items such as business info (that most people couldn't care less about) sometimes fall to the wayside.

The business information is key because it tells the player with whom he or she has a contract, i.e., the name and location of the legal entity responsible for the casino, where that “person” can be found in case of a disagreement, and what country’s law and courts will handle any disputes. The fact that a business represents that it is registered or incorporated in a certain country implies that it is subject to laws of that country and is amenable to suit there in that nation’s courts. In this case, it also implies the right to use the lawful currency of that country without penalty or paying a commission. Business vehicles, such as corporations, limited corporations, etc. are artificial “persons” in the law with potentially perpetual existence and must comply with the laws where they exist or do business.

The law in most countries requires that people have a right to know with whom they are doing business. Fictitious names and trade names need to be registered and disclosed for a reason. Misrepresenting who you are, regardless if you are real person, or a juridical person like a corporation, can invalidate contracts. If a player misrepresents who he or she is to a casino, the casino voids all winnings. Why? Because the player was not who he or she claimed to be, therefore no valid contract existed.

How is it different when a casino misrepresents who it really is?

In this case, the corporations listed that I was enticed to deposit money with, did not in fact exist! Therefore, there is no valid contract they can enforce against me, but I have rights I could enforce against them, if I know where they are and where they can be found. I am still not sure I have the whole story about them yet.


Casinomeister said:
At Casinomeister, there are numerous pages that still have copyright 1998 - 2004 on them. That doesn't mean it's not copyrighted and it doesn't mean that info is up for grabs.

Of course not, but you are confusing apples and oranges here. You want to focus on the intellectual property of a “person”, its website address, its trademarks and trade names, copyrights, etc., and ignore the owner of those property rights with whom a player enters into a contract. You can buy and sell intellectual property, but it doesn’t change the fact that it is the “person” who owns that property, a website or online casino, who is legally responsible for the content of that website or casino and the language published on it, etc. Again, in order to have accountability, the owner of this information needs to be known, not concealed or misrepresented.

Casinomeister said:
The only thing MainStreet is guilty of is not updating some of the information on their websites.

Thank you for agreeing that “MainStreet” is guilty here. Unfortunately there no longer is a company by this name. It was dissolved. The successor companies appear to be FWF Investments Ltd., and/or RX Advertising Inc. What they appear to be guilty of is a criminal offense in the UK, where they falsely claimed to be registered as a limited liability company, which in fact no longer existed. They also may be civilly or criminally liable in Canada, Costa Rica or elsewhere for similar offenses and violating fictitious name registration laws.

Casinomeister said:
Whenever their processor moves, the Ltd. is dissolved and another created.

As previously stated, the problem here is beyond the processor. The fact that the processor is listed as the owner of the casino ads a new dimension to this. It appears that the owner may also be the operator of the casino. If so, they are liable for the casino. Even if not determined to be the “operator of the casino” they could also can be required to payback commissions on winnings improperly withheld.

Casinomeister said:
Nothing wrong with that.
Once a Ltd. UK company is dissolved, it ceases to be legal. Continuing to use the Ltd. after it was dissolved appears to be criminal, and that usually means its wrong. The intent for moving around so much should also be considered. Is it to avoid legal liability from players?

Casinomeister said:
Their websites are being updated with this information.
Well it is very late. This needed to be done months and years ago.

Casinomeister said:
By the way, I wouldn't consider listing one's business as advertising so I don't really understand why you're getting your panties tied in a knot over this.

Regardless of what you label it, it was still patently false. Maybe you wouldn’t, but any judge would call the contents of a commercial website “commercial speech”, and thus advertising.

Casinomeister said:
What annoys me is the length that people go through to dis a casino that has been providing the player community a virtually complaint-free service for years.

“Dis”? What has been factually posted here that isn’t true?
Please tell me!
Am I not allowed to post the truth here?
Is quoting from their own websites “dissing” them?
Am I responsible for their failure to truthfully disclose information on their website?
In normal businesses, failing to be truthful causes problems. They weren’t truthful here.

I can only speak for myself. They didn’t provide me with complaint free service. My dad taught me never to rest on my laurels. Maybe they can learn something from this. However, the owner of the casino that provided compliant free service no longer exists. It has been dissolved. It is just like a restaurant under new ownership. The name is the same and so is the building, but it is not the same owner anymore, and really they moved the building to another country!


Casinomeister said:
If I understand this correctly, the casino offered to give you this difference in a bonus. I would say that's a pretty fair deal.

I didn’t think the offer, which was less attractive than the original bonus, was adequate compensation. Furthermore, I am not convinced that depositing more money in a casino that bizarrely charges commissions on winnings is a wise personal policy. I don’t know of any other casino does this.

Casinomeister said:
And all this mayhem for 19 GBP??

Is this directed at me?

I wanted to make sure they didn’t suck anyone else in with the hidden fees. They could have paid up at any time. Instead, I got the line about how their owner forces them to charge these excessive fees, so that led to the discussion that uncovered that they really aren’t who they said they were. The “mayhem” here was self-inflicted. No one here made them keep false information on their websites in violation of UK law. No one here made them misrepresent who they are and where they can be found. They did all this themselves, and they still haven’t taken responsibility for it. They just made things worse for themselves.

Actually, since I thought I was dealing with UK companies. I thought that they would pay up if threatened with litigation or a complaint to UK authorities. I am confident no UK judge would agree with them. It would have been a slam dunk, AND they would have had to pay the legal fees. Since they obviously are not who they said they were, I have to reevaluate my options.

Casinomeister said:
I really don't appreciate the calls for "roguedom."

I really don’t appreciate getting conned into depositing money into a company that no longer existed. Again, this appears to be a criminal act in the UK. Usually criminal acts have penalties. So what is the penalty for this here? I would not be in this position if they truthfully disclosed who they were, were they where, and their peculiar policy of charging a commission on winnings for wagering in the lawful currency of the country in which they represented they were registered. I am the victim here, along with anyone else who got taken in by them, not them.
 
Just a couple of comments before I retire for the night.

CROGO, obviously you have way too much time on your hands. For one thing, your issue is resolved. The casino always had a policy stated on their website that explained their payment policies. You aren't owed anything in my opinion. And if you are a player located in the states, why concern yourself with GBP Sterling?? Or UK casinos for that matter? That's not your currency.

The casino offered you to give you what you thought they owed you - 19 GBP - as a bonus. If you don't want that - fine and dandy, that's your problem.

Mainstreet group is a legit business and so are their processors. I have no idea why you are spending so much time getting all worked up over nothing. I wish people like you would put just as much effort into trying to solve world hunger or peace in the middle east as you do ranting on about 19 British Pounds and chasing after red herrings.

By the way, if this policy of theirs is such a huge problem (in your opinion) why are there not bucket loads of complaints. No one is getting suckered into anything - the payment policies are stated clearly on their website.

This matter is closed for all I'm concerned. I'm not wasting my time with this.
 
CROGO said:
This commission was not disclosed on their website, and in fact would be illegal if they were in fact UK companies. They have subsequently changed their websites at least twice. So the present websites do not read the same as they did previously.
Quite a post, but don't you admit at the start of this thread that the charge was mentioned on their website when you first deposited. Not as prominently as I'd agree it should have been (for such an unusual charge), but it was there.

I don't see Main Street have done much wrong here, except perhaps to be less than honest about the reason for the charge. I'd be amazed if it wasn't to discourage people playing the bonus in a currency that makes it more valuable.
 
I like to share this issue:

I already talked 3 month with Summer B. And few message with Bryan.

I know that some don't agree with me, but it is illegal here to sold personal information to another company. Based Privacy statement, etc.

And i know that Main Street Group bought player database from one ex-RTG casino (with all details), this casino didn't belong to Main Street "boss" Martin Jensen. I was in that list and Main Street Group start spamming me, even that is also against their policy.

Because i know now this ex-RTG manager, i saw same list, and i know who buy this list (one guy from Main Street Marketing).

This is probably ok in some countries, but i do not allow that some company buy my personal details, and start spamming.

But what i can do, this industry do not respect laws. They act however they want. They don't care about your privacy. They just want your money.
 
Casinomeister said:
Sorry, I disagree. Terms and conditions are key elements to a casino website and are highly focused upon. Items such as business info (that most people couldn't care less about) sometimes fall to the wayside. At Casinomeister, there are numerous pages that still have copyright 1998 - 2004 on them. That doesn't mean it's not copyrighted and it doesn't mean that info is up for grabs. It means I haven't gotten around to dealing with it yet.

But there are other sections that I am updating daily - sections that are deemed more important than others.
Claiming that they are owned by a UK limited company when they are not is similar to claiming to be licenced somewhere when they are not, which is the reason why kaave.com got on the rogue list. Ceteris paribus, I would be more likely to deposit at a casino owned by a UK company, because if it came to the worst, it would be easier for me to sue in an English court than, say, in Belize.

Copyright is different, in most major countries you own the copyright automatically without having to indicate ownership, and failing to update the date does not invalidate your copyright. Furthermore, these casinos would only have needed to update one or two pages instead of every page on a site.
 
Last edited:
Sodax77 said:
I like to share this issue:

I already talked 3 month with Summer B. And few message with Bryan.

I know that some don't agree with me, but it is illegal here to sold personal information to another company. Based Privacy statement, etc.

And i know that Main Street Group bought player database from one ex-RTG casino (with all details), this casino didn't belong to Main Street "boss" Martin Jensen. I was in that list and Main Street Group start spamming me, even that is also against their policy.

Because i know now this ex-RTG manager, i saw same list, and i know who buy this list (one guy from Main Street Marketing).

This is probably ok in some countries, but i do not allow that some company buy my personal details, and start spamming.

But what i can do, this industry do not respect laws. They act however they want. They don't care about your privacy. They just want your money.

If you know any contact details (excluding standard support addresses) i like to talk with their manager. Please send PM. Thanks.
 
I don't hink so

Probably you are incorrect.

If I am not mistaken, Mainstreet switched from RTG to Playtech Several years ago.. so you might be confusing what happened.

There is a casino representative listed in the Casino Contact list if it helps.

Why won't people let go this thread??

Weird..
 
The Watchdog said:
Probably you are incorrect.

If I am not mistaken, Mainstreet switched from RTG to Playtech Several years ago.. so you might be confusing what happened.

There is a casino representative listed in the Casino Contact list if it helps.

Why won't people let go this thread??

Weird..

You sent me PM - I replied.

And like i stated, This ex-RTG Casino didn't belong to M. Jensen ever
or in any form. Based facts.

You also said that there is "casino representative listed in the Casino Contact list".

I know that. And i start talking with Summer B. about 3 months ago.
And just talked with her, about 30 minutes.
Plus 50 other chat-session, with her, etc.

After our recent chat, she promise that M. Jensen will reply me.
 
Sodax77 said:
You sent me PM - I replied.

And like i stated, This ex-RTG Casino didn't belong to M. Jensen ever
or in any form. Based facts.

You also said that there is "casino representative listed in the Casino Contact list".

I know that. And i start talking with Summer B. about 3 months ago.
And just talked with her, about 30 minutes.
Plus 50 other chat-session, with her, etc.

After our recent chat, she promise that M. Jensen will reply me.

Thanks for your new PM "The Watchdog" :)
For some reason, Summer B. state that she didn't promise anything, referring discussion with Jansen. I also notice that she was here about 1 hour ago, and read this thread. So, maybe she change she answer after that, But i record every chat's, etc.

Main Street Group / team, i do not accept your standards. And you should learn, what is legal, and what is not. Ms. Blair, i saw how rude you were to me, because this.

I hope you respect our laws, and basic business standards.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Meister Ratings

Back
Top