1. By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies .This website or its third-party tools use cookies, which are necessary to its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy.Find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Dismiss Notice
  3. Follow Casinomeister on Twitter | Facebook | YouTube | Casinomeister.us US Residents Click here! |  Svenska Svenska | 
Dismiss Notice
REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do diddly squat without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view most discussions: you can't make contact with thousands of fellow players, affiliates, casino reps, and all sorts of other riff-raff.

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Casinomeister here!

Leo vegas self exclusion problem

Discussion in 'Other Complaints' started by adamjames, May 30, 2018.

    May 30, 2018
  1. adamjames

    adamjames Newbie member PABnoaccred

    Location:
    Uk
    Good Morning
    I'm new here so apologies if I am not posting in correct area.
    I was a member of Leo vegas since November 2017.Had no problems depositing and withdrawing for 10 months.
    Suddenly on 23/5/2018 my account was locked and a message popped up saying I'd previously SE with one of their other sites and they provided a list of 6 or 7 possibilities.
    I went straight on chat asking why it had taken them 10 months to discover this (bingo stars was the casino I'd SE from)
    Lady on chat informed me that they had only recently acquired that casino.I assumed she'd meant that week but was shocked when she said "no...From 1/03/18...So basically then a so called "self excluded player was ok to deposit from 1/3/2018 the day you had access to the names of SE players you inherited until 23rd May 2018..near on 3 months.
    I I am so annoyed by this and they are "investigating" but as I see it and in light of recent UKGC finding and fines..all my deposits from 1/3/2018 should be refunded then...Sorry to waffle just wondering where I stand.
    Thanks
     
  2. May 30, 2018
  3. TheSam469

    TheSam469 Newbie member

    Location:
    European Union
    Hi Adamjames,

    As far as I know, when one company acquires another, the self exclusion list goes along with it. Its just simple Responsible Gaming. If you're happy to stay with them its one thing, but you can claim all your deposits from the date of acquisition till your last deposit. They shouldn't hassle you, as i'm pretty sure they don't want any other fine
     
  4. May 30, 2018
  5. Harry_BKK

    Harry_BKK Senior Member CAG mm1

    Occupation:
    job is OK
    Location:
    Balcony
    LeoVegas effectively failed to detect a SE at a casino they had taken over, meaning all SE's from that casino should be applied across their network. Hence, you should be entitled to have your deposits refunded from the day the take-over was effective, 1st March 2018.

    I assume they never informed you of the BingoStars takeover either to at least give you a chance to pro-actively seek advice from them whether you can continue playing at LeoVegas.
     
  6. May 30, 2018
  7. pinnit2014

    pinnit2014 Senior Member MM PABinit

    Occupation:
    Work with figures, other audit-y things
    Location:
    Glasgow
    Point to note as well is that the LVs SE is now applied to Royal Panda (even though different licences)
     
  8. May 30, 2018
  9. adamjames

    adamjames Newbie member PABnoaccred

    Location:
    Uk
    Thanks for reply.I agree it's responsible gaming but it irks me how they suddenly shut me down with no warning after happily having me as a customer for 6 months...
     
    Last edited: May 30, 2018
  10. May 30, 2018
  11. adamjames

    adamjames Newbie member PABnoaccred

    Location:
    Uk
    Nope no warning at all...in fact on the 23/5 I deposited at 9am and by account was closed by 2.They returned my balance of 80 and have been investigating my request to rewind my account back to zero from 1/3 returning all deposits minus withdrawals.(approx 2.5k)

    It's not about the money at all but more about making the point that the casino can't have it both ways and implement things when it suits.
    I fully expect them to claim they had no access to SE list until day of my exclusion.All going to come down to wether they want another UKGC complaint over a couple of grand
     
  12. May 30, 2018
  13. adamjames

    adamjames Newbie member PABnoaccred

    Location:
    Uk
    Sorry...put 10 months throughout original thread..should read 6months
     
  14. May 30, 2018
  15. Casinomeister

    Casinomeister Forum Cheermeister Staff Member

    Occupation:
    Homemaker
    Location:
    Bierland
    It seems like you've "self excluded" for non gambling problems. Am I right? In other words you quit Bingo Stars because you didn't want to play there anymore.

    Or did you SE because you have serious gambling problems? If so, why wasn't this mentioned earlier - and why are you still playing?

    Most ADRs will just refer you to hire a lawyer/solicitor. The Self Exclusion policies have become a nightmare - abused by both casinos and players (mostly players) - that unless you can show evidence of serious gambling problems and your bona fide attempts to take the right steps, you probably don't have a case.
     
  16. May 30, 2018
  17. adamjames

    adamjames Newbie member PABnoaccred

    Location:
    Uk
    No..I would have self excluded for gambling problems.Asking why a gambler is still gambling is a bit of a strange question.If it were as simple as being able to stop then we wouldn't have the need for SE to begin with would we?

    Sorry but I didn't feel the need to go into chapter and verse about my gambling history .just stated the facts.

    I'll also add that on a number of occasions at Leo I DID exercise time out periods for up to 2 weeks.Each time my account just reopened when the period of time out had elapsed.This 9s despite a chat room operative informing me that they will always review the account and talk to the player first..well that didn't happen...
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 30, 2018
  18. May 30, 2018
  19. Casinomeister

    Casinomeister Forum Cheermeister Staff Member

    Occupation:
    Homemaker
    Location:
    Bierland
    What I am saying is, that self exclusion is the last resort to use. When you SE, you are stating and agreeing that you have a gambling problem thus being barred from the casino (and we would presume all of it's connected properties). Here you have claimed that you were gambling on another site (Leo Vegas) and you are blaming the casino for not catching you out in time. Thus you are putting the blame on them and hoping to get your money back when you should not have been doing it in the first place. Do you see a problem here?

    I am not trying to be insensitive to gambling issues here, but you have got to understand that many players abuse these policies - I am also not saying that is what has happened here. Perhaps their casino rep can clarify what has happened with your account.
     
  20. May 30, 2018
  21. adamjames

    adamjames Newbie member PABnoaccred

    Location:
    Uk
     
  22. May 30, 2018
  23. adamjames

    adamjames Newbie member PABnoaccred

    Location:
    Uk
    Bingo stars that I excluded from was acquired by Leo Vegas AFTER I joined them.I did not deliberately join a site I knew I was exclude from as Leo vegas did not acquire bingo stars until 1/3/2018 and I joined Leo 4 months before in November.Therefore it can not be my fault that I did not predict that Leo vegas would one day own a site I SE from.
    Bingo stars just now have confirmed my reason for SE .I have blacked out my name as it is my first name not my user name as obviously I could not go into my account and could only chat as a guest.
     

    Attached Files:

  24. May 30, 2018
  25. Casinomeister

    Casinomeister Forum Cheermeister Staff Member

    Occupation:
    Homemaker
    Location:
    Bierland
    Ok - thanks for that. I have sent a message to their reps. I hope this can be worked out.
     
    adamjames likes this.
  26. May 30, 2018
  27. adamjames

    adamjames Newbie member PABnoaccred

    Location:
    Uk
    My point here is that Leo Vegas cannot have things both ways.I have no issue with the deposits I made before 1/3/18 but to have access to data for 3 months that a SE player is using one of their casinos and to let 3 months elapse before stopping deposits is not on and actually in light of the recent UKGC fine a complete no no.
     
  28. May 30, 2018
  29. Lincolnuk

    Lincolnuk Senior Member MM

    Occupation:
    Company owner
    Location:
    Lincolnshire
    Its this old Minefield again..

    Just add my opinion to this which i know some will not agree with.

    Do i think leo was right. No i don't it should have been picked up earlier. This is one of the issue where having with merging data bases etc.

    Do i think Deposits should be refunded.. No Player A excludes from somewhere for admitted gaming problems then proceeds to open a account elsewhere that he knowingly was not SE from. Sorry but players have to take some responsibility themselves. The systems are there to help not hold peoples hands
     
  30. May 30, 2018
  31. mimi26

    mimi26 Meister Member

    Occupation:
    nurse
    Location:
    uk
    sorry but this makes no sense if the system was there to help then it should have been picked up the day of the merger......so not a help at all really, and 3 months is not acceptable
     
    adamjames likes this.
  32. May 30, 2018
  33. adamjames

    adamjames Newbie member PABnoaccred

    Location:
    Uk
    You are of course entitled to your own opinion.The principle is what is at stake here.Had they blocked my account up to say a week after acquiring Bingo Stars then I could live with that.It can be off no coincidence that they obviously tightened their grip AFTER being fined and on notice from UKGC that they were being watched.Up until then they happily let me continue for three months.I have looked into the figures a little further and it actually amounts to about 800 pounds.Could I let it go? Yes..should I let it go Absolutely not.Yes people need to take responsibility but if it were so easy there would be no addictions and no rules and regulations would be needed to begin with would they?
     
    mimi26 likes this.
  34. May 30, 2018
  35. Lincolnuk

    Lincolnuk Senior Member MM

    Occupation:
    Company owner
    Location:
    Lincolnshire
    Hence why i split the post in 2 parts
     
  36. May 30, 2018
  37. colinsunderland

    colinsunderland Experienced Member MM webmeister

    Occupation:
    affiliate
    Location:
    uk
    I disagree in this particular case. This isn't a case where someone opened a new account at a linked casino, lost a load of money, then complained they shouldn't have been allowed to play and tried to get their money back. If the OP's account is correct, then he opened the account, and had no problem losing until his account was closed and he found out he should have been subject to SE months previously. He didn't initiate this, LeoVegas did. He wasn't told that the SE'd account had been bought by LV (and I 100% believe that as being SE'd wouldn't have been getting any communications from them) so why would he even check, he wouldn't, therefore it is solely down to LV.
    In this case I think the deposits should be refunded. This is exactly the type of scenario casinos have been fined for previous.
     
  38. May 30, 2018
  39. adamjames

    adamjames Newbie member PABnoaccred

    Location:
    Uk
    Thank you.. this attachment shows the first time I was notified of any involvement with bingostars..this popped up on the 23/5 when I tried to log in at about 2pm.I had deposited earlier that morning as well.it was during a live chat I discovered the take over happened on 1/3/2018..I had no clue and why would I?
     

    Attached Files:

Share This Page