1. By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies .This website or its third-party tools use cookies, which are necessary to its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy.Find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Dismiss Notice
  3. Follow Casinomeister on Twitter | Facebook | YouTube | Casinomeister.us US Residents Click here! |  Svenska Svenska | 
Dismiss Notice

Poll:Best Screenshot of the Month?



Candidates Revealed...Cast your vote!.
Dismiss Notice
REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do diddly squat without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view most discussions: you can't make contact with thousands of fellow players, affiliates, casino reps, and all sorts of other riff-raff.

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Casinomeister here!

Ladbrokes "Spirit of the Promotion"

Discussion in 'Casino Complaints - Bonus Issues' started by wikipiti, Feb 21, 2011.

    Feb 21, 2011
  1. wikipiti

    wikipiti Dormant account

    Occupation:
    Technician
    Location:
    Home
    firstly hi to the forum. i found this site after googling casino complaint. heres my story

    i signed up to ladbrokes mainly for their sportsbook. i then decided to play at the casino and claim the £200 bonus. their terms were play £200 and then claim the bonus. this will be credited within 48 hours. i never received the bonus so emailed them and got the following

    Upon processing your claim yesterday our promotions department have
    decided that you had not played in the spirit of the promotion and
    therefore have not qualified.

    The bets you have placed have been considered as safe betting.


    I can tell you exactly how I played as this is the email i sent them

    I covered 1/6 for 75p. This is to recover my bet (Pays £27 for my £25 stake). They are the numbers, either side of the edge tier numbers (27 and 33)

    I then had £1.50 on 19 and 75p on chevel 16/19. I had 3 chips on 27/25/34. These are the red numbers after 0 going into the tier section of the wheel.

    I then randomly place 25p chips on numbers in the tier section of the wheel.

    May I ask, what is wrong in that? Also, whats the difference in covering NEARLY 50% of the wheel and playing blackjack?
    Also, where in the terms is in the spirit of the promotion and also say I have to wager more then £200?


    They replied with the following

    As advised your play has been deemed as not within the spirit of the
    promotion.

    This decision has been made as you have covered a large amount of the
    board, approximately 50%, and completed wagering to the total of 200
    chips. We feel that this is not standard play, for the enjoyment of
    playing the game, and your wagers have been placed solely to receive the
    promotional credit.

    We are happy to offer you the bonus, however you would be required to
    make a fresh deposit in to your Ladbrokes account and complete new
    wagering.


    so me to them

    So you say you wager £200 but what you really mean is yes £200 but if its exactly £200 then you wont get the bonus. What if I have lost would I have got the bonus then?

    PLEASE show me the Terms that say "Spirit of the Promotion" because I cant see it?


    i then got the basic run around so i emailed them this

    Ben
    Im asking you a SPECIFIC question that is very simple to answer, Yes or No

    If I play 100 hands of blackjack at £2 per hand and then claim the bonus, will I receive the bonus?


    How do you enjoy the games? How do you know if im enjoying playing or not? If I win, Ive enjoyed it, if I dont, I wont?


    to which they eventually replied with this

    We are unable to give you a specific yes or no answer to this question.

    As your play on Roulette was deemed as only playing towards the bonus
    funds and not for the enjoyment of the game your account has now been
    flagged as not playing within the spirit of our promotions. If we feel
    that you are only wagering on our website to collect the bonus funds we
    would refuse the bonus again. We would recommend that you do not wager
    if this is the only reason for you play.


    surely this is a pee take. ive met the wagering but they have come out with "Spirit of the Promotion." what spirit and what enjoyment. surely if you win you enjoy it and if you dont, you dont.

    have i any redress on this?
     
  2. Feb 21, 2011
  3. Deeplay

    Deeplay New World Order CAG mm1 webmeister

    Occupation:
    Works For Self
    Location:
    The biG Eu
    Yet more BULL from Ladbrokes! Such a vague term "in the spirit of the promotion" Which spirit ? This is the reason Ladbrokes never give a bonus instantly on deposit but reel in as many customers as possible with there opening offer knowing that many of them will not even get the bonus as they can just twist the rules to suit them so as NOT to pay a bonus. Its a win win situation for the casino the player looses his deposit without even getting the chance to play the bonus. And notice no Ladbrokes reps ever around. As per the other thread on Ladbrokes check my solution which includes and is limited to a FULL UNINSTALL of their software!
     
    1 person likes this.
  4. Feb 21, 2011
  5. rainmaker

    rainmaker I'm not a penguin CAG webmeister

    Occupation:
    -
    Location:
    -
    Oh yes...in "the spirit of the bonus". We just love that :rolleyes:, a good casino would never use that phrase.

    But you have no case. The casino is not committed to give you your bonus.

    When you do a deposit, always wait for the bonus to be credited before starting to play. But in this case, they might have confiscated your winnings.

    The use of "in the spirit of the bonus" is roguish. It usually means that a casino will not allow any winnings with the bonus. Just pathetic


    Good luck :)
     
  6. Feb 21, 2011
  7. Nifty29

    Nifty29 Dormant account

    Occupation:
    PAID CASINO SHILL
    Location:
    Turn right, then right. then right again
    When are casinos going to get the memo? ?

    There is NO SUCH THING as the SPIRIT of a BONUS.

    If you don't want roulette or any other games played a specific way, then LIST that SPECIFICALLY in the terms.

    How can a player knowingly violate a term they don't know exists?. Read the Casino management's mind?

    Sorry but roulette was an allowed game. So what is the problem?

    I should add that it seems obvious the OP was doing what the casino says - my problem is that it isn't specifically banned.
     
    1 person likes this.
  8. Feb 21, 2011
  9. wikipiti

    wikipiti Dormant account

    Occupation:
    Technician
    Location:
    Home
    Nifty
    it was common sense to play for the bonus. i didnt want to lose before i recevied the bonus. there was no point in wageringover the 200 as that wouldnt count towards my turnover.

    also, you have to wager before the bonus on this one as it isnt given to you until you wager 200

    i could understand it if i had had £18 on black and £1 on every other number but i didnt. i had a just under even money bet. hardly safe
     
  10. Feb 21, 2011
  11. Rick Deckard

    Rick Deckard Experienced Member

    Occupation:
    IT
    Location:
    UK


    This reminded me of the recent news story of Barclays bank getting away with paying only 1% corparation tax instead of the standard 28%. Saving them 2.7 billion. When questioned they replied, we paid our tax "in the spirit and the letter".


    wikipedia.org/wiki/Letter_and_spirit_of_the_law
     
  12. Feb 21, 2011
  13. PlexRep

    PlexRep Dormant account

    Occupation:
    Marketing
    Location:
    Malta
    Not sure I agree with you there Rainmaker. I went looking for this mysterious spirit on the Ladbrokes pages, and discovered two things.

    On the £200 welcome bonus page I could find NO mention of the spirit, but I did find it on another promo page of theirs (the $25 free) where it stated:

    Ladbrokescasino.com reserves the right to refuse all future promotions and bonuses to customers who do not take part in the promotion in the spirit it is intended.

    To me it sounds like they need to pay up in this instance and wikipiti needs to move on to another casino.
     
    2 people like this.
  14. Feb 21, 2011
  15. rainmaker

    rainmaker I'm not a penguin CAG webmeister

    Occupation:
    -
    Location:
    -

    Yes, you're absolutely right. I did read the wrong T&C:rolleyes:

    Bit strange that they dont mention "in the spirit" in their welcome bonus T&C.

    Thanks for correcting me :)
     
  16. Feb 22, 2011
  17. rainmaker

    rainmaker I'm not a penguin CAG webmeister

    Occupation:
    -
    Location:
    -
    I asked Ladbrokes about "in the spirit" practice.

    They replied:

    "We are pleased to offer an extensive range of promotional products
    across all lobbies of Ladbrokes. Promotions are offered in order to
    enhance customers gaming experience. Unfortunately in order to ensure
    fair practice and prevent bonus abuse, terms and conditions stipulations
    are necessary."

    Bonus abuse :laugh:
     
  18. Feb 22, 2011
  19. Deeplay

    Deeplay New World Order CAG mm1 webmeister

    Occupation:
    Works For Self
    Location:
    The biG Eu
    I would love to know which page this "extensive range of promotional products" from the Lobby is located ? And the above answer is without doubt as vague as it can get!
     
  20. Feb 22, 2011
  21. Mousey

    Mousey Ueber Meister Mouse CAG

    Occupation:
    Pencil Pusher
    Location:
    Up$hitCreek
    Yes, but most casinos do not want players who have any brains, but prefer witless zombies who have no clue as to whether a bonus is even worth taking much less as to how it should be played.

    If a casino does not want a players own monies played in any particular manner, this must be clearly spelled out in the T&C. If a particular promo is losing the casino money, pull the damn promo from your affilitates and don't let marketing send it out to more players.

    Note to casinos: There is NO 'spirit' of a promo.... no santa clause... no bonus abuse. If a player meets WR, fulfills T&C, he is to be paid, bonus to be given, whatever -- to complete the 'contract' begun by accepting the players funds and bets. Then you may bonus ban him, or even lock him out of the casino once all wagering is done and any winnings paid.
     
    3 people like this.
  22. Feb 22, 2011
  23. rainmaker

    rainmaker I'm not a penguin CAG webmeister

    Occupation:
    -
    Location:
    -
    Yes, the reply was vague.

    "In the spirit" is also very vague. It means that they can confiscate whatever they want with that explanation.

    They are accredited on Casinomeister. It is stated in the "standard for accredited casinos:

    Must not confiscate winnings for vague & unclear reasons, such as "irregular playing patterns" or "bonus abuse", without specific T&C violations

    They have not confiscated any winnings in this case, but "in the spirit" practice does not belong in an accredited casinos T&C.
     
  24. Feb 22, 2011
  25. vinylweatherman

    vinylweatherman You type well loads CAG MM

    Occupation:
    STILL At Leisure
    Location:
    United Kingdom

    They clearly do NOT meet the standards for accreditation. The player also asked a DIRECT question as to whether they could play Blackjack at £2 per hand, and the CS REFUSED TO ANSWER, leaving the player vulnerable to doing this, and STILL being told it is not "in the spirit of".

    Surely this wager deposit 1x rule is DESIGNED to make players play in this way, after all one wants to get this technical qualification out of the way BEFORE getting the bonus, since you can ONLY complete the WR once the bonus has been credited. Only once the bonus HAS been credited can the player start to "enjoy themselves" knowing that they are also making progress towards the WR.

    A very simple amendment to the terms would get rid of the need to pull this "spirit of" stunt, the £200 has to be wagered through once on SLOTS, where you CANNOT "cover half the table".

    Betting only on Red, or playing £2 Blackjack would ALSO be "not in the spirit", yet the CS REFUSED to say this, preferring the option to let the player try again, only to be told AGAIN they are not getting the bonus.

    Do sports betters play "for enjoyment", do they BOLLOCKS:D They study form, teams, tipsters, etc, and bet with the intention of having selected the WINNER.

    Casino players may play games they like, but who in hell "enjoys" LOSING all the time. The main incentive to play for real money is to one day WIN real money.

    This BULLSHIT seems to coincide with the Ladbrokes take over of Cassava, and seems to show that Ladbrokes have gained some BAD HABITS from Cassava, who are always pulling this bullcrap on players.

    This could be the start of a steady "fall from grace", and I expect Ladbrokes casino is not quite what it seems.

    I think it NEVER has been either, and has NEVER been run directly by the "household name" Ladbrokes, but is instead a kind of "white label", an unknown company that has rented the right to use the Ladbrokes brand to operate a Microgaming casino, and which will soon migrate to Cassava, where it will emerge as a full grown Cassava white label.

    This has ALREADY happened to Littlewoods casino, which was NEVER run directly by Littlewoods, but by "E-Cash" who operate "white label" Crypto casinos. Littlewoods then changed their white label service provider, and became a Cassava white label, changing their terms to match those of other Cassava white label casinos, which surely they would NOT have done if they were TRULY independent of the software provider, since there was NOTHING else that would have made Littlewoods snub their VIP players by suddenly introducing far WORSE terms just because of a software change.
     
  26. Feb 22, 2011
  27. Zultha

    Zultha Dormant account

    Occupation:
    Deputy Headmaster
    Location:
    Crewe
    I too have looked into the accreditation of Ladbrokes and find where they fall down

    # Must not confiscate winnings for vague & unclear reasons, such as "irregular playing patterns" or "bonus abuse", without specific T&C violations.
    # Must not implement terms that can be construed as "unfair" towards the player.
    # No player shall be involuntarily placed into a situation which breaches the terms and conditions during the course of play.

    Also, there rep is non existant, it just goes to the general CS.

    The important thing that I found while in email discussion with Bryan and Max is they refuse to discuss problems with Casinomeister so why extend the benefit of being accredited?
     
  28. Feb 22, 2011
  29. vinylweatherman

    vinylweatherman You type well loads CAG MM

    Occupation:
    STILL At Leisure
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Well, looks like we have their "gotcha".

    Any player who gets this "spirit of BS" should make a formal PAB.

    This will make Ladbrokes have to go on record as refusing to deal with PABs, which will trigger automatic loss of accreditation and a listing under "no-can-do", which ALSO tends to lead to a "not recommended" rating, and a "proceed with caution" in the "all MGS casinos" list.

    At present, they do not appear to have confiscated winnings, but this item has been CLEARLY breached:-


    by the following exchange:-


    According to the terms, the answer should be a clear "yes", since there is NO "irregular play" in this scenario, it is just normal Blackjack play.

    They also claim that meeting WR EXACTLY to 200 was also a factor, implying that the player should have wagered an unspecified amount OVER this for their play to be deemed "recreational".

    Rival didn't get away with horsedung like this, so why do Ladbrokes think the rules are going to be different for them. It's surely not just a case of "...because we are Ladbrokes, not some clip joint".

    That's TWO of my 2011 Casinomeister awards nominations sorted, and we are not even through with February:(
     
  30. Feb 22, 2011
  31. threescatters

    threescatters Dormant account PABnonaccred

    Occupation:
    .
    Location:
    UK
    very very disappointed to see this from ladbrokes, they used to be really up there with the best
     
  32. Feb 22, 2011
  33. vinylweatherman

    vinylweatherman You type well loads CAG MM

    Occupation:
    STILL At Leisure
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    This malaise seems to be affecting sportsbooks who have a casino product, rather than stand alone casinos.

    First we had Purple Lounge pull a stunt (since rectified) on a Greek player, then Betfair, and now Ladbrokes.

    All three are mainly sportsbooks, which is where their main expertise lies. When it comes to casinos though, they seem to think they can behave like sportsbooks and void wagers at the drop of a hat when the outcome looks "suspicious". There may be grounds for this with sports, and all the "match fixing" scandals that have come to light, but the ONLY thing that gets "fixed" in a casino is the machine, and as far as MGS are concerned, this just CANNOT happen. Other software vendors also believe that where it is player vs software, there can be no case for "match fixing", and the resultant voiding of bets.
     
  34. Feb 23, 2011
  35. vinylweatherman

    vinylweatherman You type well loads CAG MM

    Occupation:
    STILL At Leisure
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Spirit of the bonus
     
  36. Feb 23, 2011
  37. Casinomeister

    Casinomeister Forum Cheermeister Staff Member

    Occupation:
    Homemaker
    Location:
    Bierland
    Andy is here just about on a daily basis and facilitates our communications with the casino management.

    Um - excuse me? I told you that Ladbrokes is bound by its own terms not share any player info with us. So if you have a complaint, you have to deal with them directly or then take it up with their licensing agency.

    In the meantime, I had no problem in making sure that the right people saw your complaint (or any others for that matter). They called me this morning to let me know you were paid. Am I right?

    A simple thank you would have sufficed. :rolleyes:

    As for the "Spirit of the Bonus", this is an unfair term and should not be used:

    http://www.casinomeister.com/philosophy.php#players

    It looks like someone slept through Online Casino Management 101 - "Making Offers to Players". Some remedial training is necessary.
     
  38. Feb 23, 2011
  39. vinylweatherman

    vinylweatherman You type well loads CAG MM

    Occupation:
    STILL At Leisure
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    So, Ladbrokes is a "no-can-do" as far as the PAB service is concerned.

    For them to claim they are bound by their OWN terms is the SAME argument used by other casinos who don't want to deal with Max. There is no LAW that provides for an ABSOLUTE prohibition on cooperating with a mediator in a dispute.
    This argument has already gone before the UK's Information Commissioner, and his verdict was "bullshit" (but in more technical language), there is no ABSOLUTE prohibition in law, all that is needed is for the person who's data is to be shared to give a formal permission for this to take place, which is part of the PAB process in any case. Ladbrokes are using a false argument under data protection laws, and then distancing themselves from responsibilty by saying they are "bound" by terms that they have themselves made up, seemingly in an attempt to make it HARDER for players to seek independent assistance with an issue.
    The Information Commissioner has even gone further, and told businesses that they must NOT misuse the data protection act to stifle the ability of customers to get independent help and advice over an issue.

    Casinos also use this argument to hide behind a regulator that they know has no effective player disputes resolution channel. Whilst Gibraltar is considered more reliable than others (Malta for example) in this respect, it STILL means players are frozen out from using the PAB service.

    The fact that a casino can say they will no longer cooperate with the PAB system, yet remain accredited, is what is making members somewhat uncomfortable. This is WITHOUT the recent use by them of this "spirit of the bonus" argument to deny players offers as advertised.

    I always thought that cooperation with the PAB service was one of the "core" requirements for being accredited here, and I recall that when Villento brands decided they no longer wanted to deal with PABs, they were removed from the accredited section to become a "no-can-do".
     
    1 person likes this.

Share This Page