This is great! So then if I send you verified, notarized documents then that will prove that they stole from me correct? Then would you do anything to get me paid my rightful money? I am very willing to do it and it would be proof that the casino is not always right. In fact, they could not be more wrong and here is a very logical way to PROVE it and not just guess about it.
Can we please do this?
It has already been determined that you suffered an injustice, so Bryan doesn't need any more convincing. Unfortunately, he has no power to make them pay up, so doing this would be futile.
Players have to decide for themselves whether they are willing to play at a casino where it is acceptable for innocent players to suffer an injustice purely in the interests of the casino maintaining a rigid approach of being unable to accept that they could possibly have made such a major mistake in examining their evidence. A better casino would at least pay up as a "goodwill gesture" in such a case, even though it would not be prepared to accept that it's own determination was wrong.
I am not at all happy that signing up through a particular affiliate who just happens to be sending lots of "bad traffic" to the casino justifies the assumption that EVERY player that has come their way is connected to each other, and to the fraud ring behind it all.
I would also expect this affiliate to no longer be in any position to have further "history" of sending ANY traffic to the casino, and to be on a blacklist for fraud against affiliate programs as the players would be blacklisted for being part of the player side of this fraud effort.
If players want to steer clear of inadvertent involvement just because they went through a rogue affiliate, they should go direct. They will then be judged on their own merits, and any connections would have to be determined from other criteria.
The argument over documents is inevitable given how casinos receive them, a scanned JPEG file, rather than sight of the document itself. Given how hard it can be to detect a fake document that you have in front of you, it is easy to see how much harder it is to detect a faked JPEG, or worse, a good JPEG of an expertly forged document.
As for:-
How in the world would you be at an advantage on the casino by pretending to be someone else then playing with your own money?
Although you don't see how, there clearly HAS to be one, else fraudsters would not go to the effort of doing it.
As for an innocent player, WHY would they fake their details, knowing that this can ONLY lead to trouble, yet could not possibly give them an advantage.