ah yes ic is using some kind of program code in bj to not let u go over a set amount. For example let's say between 40 and 49 is the limit. You will not be able to get 50 no matter how hard u try.This is outright cheating and we as a whole should not stand for it. Knowledge is power. This is easily proven.
intercasino uses a rng code to limit your winnings
- Thread starter rainman
- Start date
linda7
Non-Gambler
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2002
- Location
- Brooklyn, NY
Rainman,
Give it a break already. I know people who make a ton of money over at Intercasino playing BJ. You seem to be obsessed with this IC cheating thought....perhaps you should consider giving up gambling, it upsets you very much.
Give it a break already. I know people who make a ton of money over at Intercasino playing BJ. You seem to be obsessed with this IC cheating thought....perhaps you should consider giving up gambling, it upsets you very much.
I've played there for MANY years and have made many $$ from them. Even playing bj.
All your log viewer will show is your wins & losses, not PROOF that there is a cheat code. You'd need to have recorded at least 100,000 hands in order to show any kind of cheating pattern. I think the recent report that shows microgaming may be less than random had a few million hands worth of data, and even that is being questioned.
It seems like every place you have played at is 'cheating' at bj. Is there any online casino you have played at that you think is not cheating you?
All your log viewer will show is your wins & losses, not PROOF that there is a cheat code. You'd need to have recorded at least 100,000 hands in order to show any kind of cheating pattern. I think the recent report that shows microgaming may be less than random had a few million hands worth of data, and even that is being questioned.
It seems like every place you have played at is 'cheating' at bj. Is there any online casino you have played at that you think is not cheating you?
my log viewer does show a cheating pattern. ive probably played close to that no. of hands. Ive played there for yrs. I think this senator kyle bs might have somehting to do with casinos tightening up their software. Possibly my suspicious play in the past where I was winning alot of money with a high low type of card count may be to blame. I almost always know when the dealer has bj based on how much money I have left. I ve been between 90 percent to a 100 range on this.this pattern has been happening for mths. now.I keep playing to prove it wrong and it is always the same. No doubts at all they rigged the software whether just me or everyone. Im sure it didnot help me emailing them with this. Ive sent them my log viewer results to show this but they already know.Ive tried quite a few different strategies to see if one works against their software but always the same. If I am at that cutoff amount I know I will lose that hand or push.
hey jpm or anybody if u dont have an account at william hill please open one and come watch me play there so I can show u the limit pattern. You want proof come watch me play. Like I said I can easily prove it. Heck come play with me cause at will hill I may be able to win with anohter player but alone they keep limiting me. I am the only one there too seems to say something about this one. I am going back there now 8:54 pm est. talk is cheap but evidence ain't
Lol jinnia!
Well I watched rainman or bakelady, whichever he/she is for at least an hour starting about 10 mins after his/her post. He/she was playing alone versus the dealer.
What I observed was a remarkable number of player blackjacks, probably twice as many as the dealer. The dealer ALWAYS checked for bj when he had a 10 showing or an ace showing after offering insurance. The player did not play perfect strategy as previously stated. I had a chart open on a second screen while watching the game and during that hour observed at least 5 deviations from perfect play strategies (e.g. splitting when you should hit, or vice/versa, doubling/not doubling when you should/shouldn't, etc). At least 4 of these were costly errors, resulting in a loss/push/or smaller win than the player should have had.
But the main problem I saw was the utilization of a progressive betting 'strategy'. I think all of the experts agree that these are doomed to failure. This accounted for the largest percentage of player losses. Also, the player didn't drop back to their original base bet ($4) after a while and began betting more and more in an apparent effort to win back losses. This is also a strategy that is doomed to failure. The player was staying pretty much even until these strategies began taking their toll. After about an hour on this low limit table, this player lost about $200 and was still playing when I left.
Looked like a typical land based game to me. I didn't see any obvious cheating by the dealer. I'd say both player & dealer got their share of multicard 21 hands, and as I said before the player had probably 2x the number of natural bj's as the dealer. Chasing lost money and getting greedy on some hand is coming back to bite him/her. The problem is really with the way the player is betting & playing, not with the RNG.
Well I watched rainman or bakelady, whichever he/she is for at least an hour starting about 10 mins after his/her post. He/she was playing alone versus the dealer.
What I observed was a remarkable number of player blackjacks, probably twice as many as the dealer. The dealer ALWAYS checked for bj when he had a 10 showing or an ace showing after offering insurance. The player did not play perfect strategy as previously stated. I had a chart open on a second screen while watching the game and during that hour observed at least 5 deviations from perfect play strategies (e.g. splitting when you should hit, or vice/versa, doubling/not doubling when you should/shouldn't, etc). At least 4 of these were costly errors, resulting in a loss/push/or smaller win than the player should have had.
But the main problem I saw was the utilization of a progressive betting 'strategy'. I think all of the experts agree that these are doomed to failure. This accounted for the largest percentage of player losses. Also, the player didn't drop back to their original base bet ($4) after a while and began betting more and more in an apparent effort to win back losses. This is also a strategy that is doomed to failure. The player was staying pretty much even until these strategies began taking their toll. After about an hour on this low limit table, this player lost about $200 and was still playing when I left.
Looked like a typical land based game to me. I didn't see any obvious cheating by the dealer. I'd say both player & dealer got their share of multicard 21 hands, and as I said before the player had probably 2x the number of natural bj's as the dealer. Chasing lost money and getting greedy on some hand is coming back to bite him/her. The problem is really with the way the player is betting & playing, not with the RNG.
I played some craps too cause I can never get past a certaiin amouint with straight bj. If u see me there playing watch my balance not wins too losses. everything is not alwys as it seems. Also I want to test a theory , I need one player to play bj with me. I have played with one other person before and won rather easily but now no one is there.At least on my screen I am only one. I am using the cd they sent me cause I could not gain access with the download.That may have something to do with it.
Similar threads
- Article
