@ the OP, The term was obviously there before the time you played and again after. If you sincerely think you're in the right, why don't you contact the LGA? It's possible that there was a glitch when whoever uploaded that file and maybe the LGA record will prove you right.
Of course if the LGA record proves the term was there the whole time, then you'll have to suck it up and move on. But either way, you'll get your answer. There's nothing to be gained by complaining about it here, Max has done all he can, and your next step should be the LGA.
While I don't have a problem with Intercasino myself I would be absolutely furious if a casino made me pay to get notorised documentation if they had absolutely no intention of paying me.
Have they returned the players deposit?
The casino is willing to return my deposit, but didnt pay for the notarization. Still working on this case, trying to find evidence at the moment by talking to computergeeks. Im surprised how hard it seems to retrieve information in the internet of the past. There must be people recording everything that happens all over the internet.
I noticed another thing btw while going through all intercasinomails, i recieved an depositconfirmation email exactly 1 month after my initial deposit, even tho i never deposited again. I answered and asked why i recieved that email, they apologized and said it was a mistake.
I know that by this date one month later the terms and conditions already changed, so is there a chance that they have a mistake in their system about the actual date of deposit? Like i deposited on the 26th of july where no anti vpn term existed, but the system may show 26th august when things changed already. This depositconfirmationmail 1 month after kinda makes me wonder. This never happened to me before
I just found another very recent case in a reputable gamblingforum, where intercasino denies a player a payout of 4411 euros saying he breached the terms, but refuse to mention which term or give more infos, they just keep saying go complain to the LGA. The other forum put intercasino on the blacklist or hall of shame like they call it, since they refused to cooperate or mention any reasons for the no pay decision. Now im not saying intercasinos no pay decision is wrong, maybe the player really did do breach the terms and conditions, what im pointing at is the terrible way they treat their costumers, shutting them down hoping for them to keep quiet and walk away silently.
Till this day i dont know if i used vpn or not, never confirmed i did and i myself know for a fact the term that forbids vpn didnt even exist when i signed up, i hope ppl can understand my frustration, it feels like a big punch in the face. However i will keep updating this situation and do all i can to prove im right.
I thought im likely not allowed to post names of forums or links, since its kinda competition of cm i guess, which i respect and understand. If im wrong and actually allowed to post those pls let me know or pm me for more info. thanks
I'm familiar with that case too.
It was a player who had signed up to Intercasino through GamblingCity. Because of that affiliate sites unique offers to players who sign up to casinos through their site, its much easier for a player to gamble with an edge on almost any casino (even without accepting bonuses or breaking T&Cs). It's my belief that some casinos promoted on that site might be a tad more likely to give a player the "FU" if they've signed up through GamblingCity.
wow thats insane if true. They granted him the bonus in the first place and when he actually won something they denied payout? Like if gamblingcity offers a special bonus and players are able to get that bonus on intercasino, that means the casino agreed with gamblingcity on this right, otherwise this wouldnt be possible? like the sites have to be working together.
Since this post is somewhat dormant, and since many other examples of that casino practices are being presented, It´s very strange no conclusion being shown. So I ask if someone can answer:
Did the player received the money won?;
Did the player saw the original money returned? ( with or without the notary expenses);
Did the player contact ( and get a reply ) from LGA, regarding a complaint and/or the time stamp of the Casino Terms validity?
Hope any final enlightment and transparency can be shown here to benefit of all online players.