Inet.......The last straw

I can't speak for Inet, but in my place of work our enterprise e-mail is protected by a complex and expensive filter system. This sits between our internal mail severs and the internet (called the dmz -
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
), and acts as the edge server to our exchange organization (
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
).

Boring stuff aside, this system is designed to block spam and remove dangerous mail. It is auto updated from black lists provided from various sources.

We also manually ajust it ourselves, blocking spammers, undesirables, and crooked domains. We also maintain a white list where addresses and domains can be added to allow mail through unmolested.

Even with this, hundreds of e-mails a week are routinely incorrectly classified and blocked. This requires a manual release, and normally someone wouldn't even know unless they we expecting mail and it didn't arrive.

Staff can be notified via e-mail, as can the sender if the mail is auto blocked, genuine mail can be released. Not a good idea for staff, as they wouldn't want a notification e-mail every time an incoming spam message was blocked (several thousand a week). Good idea for the sender though.

Anyway, it's possible this is where many of the phantom e-mails are going.
 
iNetBet has been Accredited at Casinomeister for nearly 20 years.
The thing that gets to me is:

Here we are as a forum commenting on the negative aspects of Inetbets support system and in some cases offering possible solutions. At this stage all we can do is speculate about where the problem lies. It would be befitting for the Operator to at the very least have the courtesy to acknowledge there IS a problem with emails reaching them and that they are looking into it.

I can't understand why this should go on for 11 pages and the Casino not have the decency to chime in. I mean, sure; there are negative comments but you offer a service and if it is not what people expect, then get ready for people to air their views.

Not once have I seen the Management come forward and humbly notify their patrons that they would consider any of the solutions offered, or say what they are doing in trying to rectify the communciation issues, or stipulating that Live Chat is not available 24hours a day or even telling us what they would try and do to alleviate their recurrent communication flaws.

In the end... does your input really matter? Seems like it probably doesn't.

Nate
 
I would love to see Inet have Live chat but it will never happen and I am cool with that , if there are more than a few casinos that pay within 24 hours , 7 days a week and even on holidays for US players than let me know:D

Inetbet is a sure to pay casino and they will get back with you , the gmail thing has had its problems and is a well known path for spammers , trust me on that , we fight it daily:eek:

The promo dudes and dudettes are strickly business and I respect that fact and if they ever changed I would be sooooo worried:p They do their job and get folks paid and thats a huge plus:D

Well thats my 2 cents worth;)

Laurie
 
Well, in my case, the job is NOT being done. Although one address is gmail, the one from the forum involved would be their own, and my ISP's mail service, which I receive all of Inetbet's promotional mailings and have registered one my account.

Since I've asked the forum involved for help, I'm trying to give a couple of days there for action. But if the mail was blocked the first time, will a second one go through?

I usually deposit pretty frequently with Inetbet, but I don't feel I can until this matter is cleared.
 
One important question hasn't been answered:

What was the FIRST straw??? :D

Seriously though, the contact problem seems to be far more widespread than I thought, and I think it probably is time for a reassessment of contact methods. Even a phone service would help, even just during office hours.

I agree that its time to at least consider some changes.
 
I can't speak for Inet, but in my place of work our enterprise e-mail is protected by a complex and expensive filter system. This sits between our internal mail severs and the internet (called the dmz -
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
), and acts as the edge server to our exchange organization (
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
).

Boring stuff aside, this system is designed to block spam and remove dangerous mail. It is auto updated from black lists provided from various sources.

We also manually ajust it ourselves, blocking spammers, undesirables, and crooked domains. We also maintain a white list where addresses and domains can be added to allow mail through unmolested.

Even with this, hundreds of e-mails a week are routinely incorrectly classified and blocked. This requires a manual release, and normally someone wouldn't even know unless they we expecting mail and it didn't arrive.

Staff can be notified via e-mail, as can the sender if the mail is auto blocked, genuine mail can be released. Not a good idea for staff, as they wouldn't want a notification e-mail every time an incoming spam message was blocked (several thousand a week). Good idea for the sender though.

Anyway, it's possible this is where many of the phantom e-mails are going.

Senders are NOT receiving any kind of autoblock message when an email doesn't get through to iNetBet, they are left to assume the email is being dealt with, so when there is no reply for hours, days, or even a YEAR, they can think the email has been dealt with by an intentional refusal to respond on the part of CS. This is why the complaints usually take the form "iNetBet are ignoring my emails/problem".

Given that this happens when players use the email address they registered alongside their personal details when opening the account, even the "whitelist" filter option isn't working properly. iNetBet must surely have something in place to manage the inbound email traffic, but it is clearly not up to the job because it gets it wrong often enough to create an ever visible issue in the forum. The rep has previously mentioned that when dealing with an issue that has reached the forum, they have "found" the original email that was allegedly "ignored" by the complainant. This is an indication that the management of their filters is not being done on a regular basis to ensure it is not blocking legitimate customer emails.

The other problem is one of attitude. Some complainants who believe they have been ignored have actually had replies from iNetBet, but have not received them. As far as iNetBet are concerned, the player has "deliberately ignored" or "failed to look for" the reply, so it is "their fault". One case where a complainant said iNetBet were repeatedly ignoring emails was even accused of not having sent them on the grounds that iNetBet "deal with all emails sent". It's about as close as you can get to calling a customer a "liar" without actually using the word. Given this, it is hypocracy for iNetBet to take offence when it is the PLAYER that accuses iNetBet of a deliberate intent to ignore their emails when they have simply failed to get through to the CS team.

The current position seems to be that iNetBet believe the problem is not big enough for any action to be taken because the "majority of players" do not encounter the issues raised. It is common for "big business" to ignore a problem that only affects a small number of customers, even when it repeatedly affects the same small group to the point where they get a service that would be deemed totally unacceptable were a much larger number of customers affected. It is the most oft given "excuse" on BBC's Watchdog program by a big company that has been featured with example cases of the most appalling standards of service. It is also of interest that Watchdog's example cases are solved within a week of the program airing, even where the complainant has spent many months trying to deal with the company "out of public view". It's not too dissimilar to how many casino problems get solved quickly after they are aired here and a rep (or PAB) gets involved, even where it has been going on for months before this. It's one reason problems DO get aired here, even those annoying minor ones that no-one seems to want to get to grips with.

Long term issues being dealt with swiftly once placed in the public gaze is a symptom of poor customer service, as with good customer service such problems would be dealt with straight away.


Well, in my case, the job is NOT being done. Although one address is gmail, the one from the forum involved would be their own, and my ISP's mail service, which I receive all of Inetbet's promotional mailings and have registered one my account.

Since I've asked the forum involved for help, I'm trying to give a couple of days there for action. But if the mail was blocked the first time, will a second one go through?

I usually deposit pretty frequently with Inetbet, but I don't feel I can until this matter is cleared.
 
InetBet and Emily Hanson each have a very active Facebook page. If you really want to know if they are ignoring you or not, message them on Facebook and see what happens.

I know this is not a good way to get answers but if it's the only thing that works, then maybe you should try it.
 
InetBet and Emily Hanson each have a very active Facebook page. If you really want to know if they are ignoring you or not, message them on Facebook and see what happens.

I know this is not a good way to get answers but if it's the only thing that works, then maybe you should try it.

Maybe thats the problem, to much time on Facebook and not enough answering emails.
 
Personally, I have had no problems with INET in the last 2 years. Yes I have had ,in the past, them not receiving my email. Seems all okay now, i get paid on time when I do.
My question is WHY DO YOU GUYS STAY AT INET IF THERE ARE CONSISTENT problems?
I played at SLOTOCASH for one day , and closed my accoint in less than 24 hours because of a minor problem.
Live longer , reduce stress try other rtg's which is only what we in the US can play
Good Luck
 
I have had the original issue addressed early today. I've had no email from Inetbet regarding it, but my account has now been credited.

I did receive a pm from InetbetPromos today indicating they had no idea of what my issue is. I'll be sending a response with my email details so hopefully they can find where communication went wrong.
 
InetBet and Emily Hanson each have a very active Facebook page. If you really want to know if they are ignoring you or not, message them on Facebook and see what happens.

I know this is not a good way to get answers but if it's the only thing that works, then maybe you should try it.

On that front, INetBet is very consistent.

I use gmail as a last resort. My email address has not changed in 10 years and is with a major ISP (Comcast). The only blocked emails were from different Rival support for unknown reasons - proven by them sending the original email to my gmail account.

This issue isn't going away. There will be another thread started from a disgruntled customer soon. Stay tuned...:rolleyes:
 
On that front, INetBet is very consistent.

I use gmail as a last resort. My email address has not changed in 10 years and is with a major ISP (Comcast). The only blocked emails were from different Rival support for unknown reasons - proven by them sending the original email to my gmail account.

This issue isn't going away. There will be another thread started from a disgruntled customer soon. Stay tuned...:rolleyes:

I couldnt agree more, with all the issues and responses, ironic that not one of them was from Inet and quite frankly there was no real particiaption from Max or Bryan, I guess I will refer back to my original post on this topic.

May as well lock this now, no sense in going any further.
 
payout not too good at InetBet but did receive monthly managers bonus and haven't had issues with my emails
 
iNetBet has been Accredited at Casinomeister for nearly 20 years.

Users who are viewing this thread

Click here for Red Cherry Casino

Meister Ratings

Back
Top