iNet 23%?

skiny

Banned User - violation of <a href="http://www.cas
Joined
Oct 30, 2008
Location
Canada
I started playing at iNet recently since I opened my spanking new Moneybookers account and after almost 2500 spins on various games such as Achilles, Honey to the bee, Diamond Dozen... the regulars I was told I am averaging a 23% payout percentage.

I emailed the casino again and asked if this didn't seem a little strange. The casino didn't seem the slightest bit surprised and said that this is quite normal.

I was just wondering who thinks 23% after almost 2500 spins is quite normal?
 

Pinababy69

RIP Lisa
Joined
Oct 15, 2004
Location
Toronto, Ontario - Canada
I've had some single sessions Skiny...in excess of 2000 spins, where my return was in the 60 or 70 percent range...at Inet, at 3Dice, at 32Red. But never have I had a session in the 25% vicinity. That is beyond brutal.

Was this one session? Or spread out over a few? Either way, all I can say is that it is due to even out for you...and I hope you have some MONSTER hits coming to you. Cause that's what it will take to get you into the 90's.

That's sick. :eek:
 

skiny

Banned User - violation of <a href="http://www.cas
Joined
Oct 30, 2008
Location
Canada
That was over several sessions. I ignored the first few. Then I started to get a bit peaved. Then I emailed.

I've read and been a part of all the high and low variance conversations and the good runs and bad runs. I've seen long term percentages in the 60s to 70s.

I can fully understand over say 500 spins sitting in the 20s or 30s but if a casino's average payout percentage is even at 90% you would think that after a few thousand spins something has to start to level out. It really shouldn't just sit there session after session at 20 to 25%.

I've already given up on it. I've never hit zero so many times one session after another in my life. I'm not going to keep spinning here until I need a random jackpot just to break even. lol

When they said this was normal for slot games to have highs and lows. (I see no highs) I mentioned that I was going to ask here for more opinions. They said I was threatening them. I wasn't aware that discussing our game play with each other here was considered a threat.

We've sent 3 or 4 very short notes back and forth to each other via email since they're probably the only online casino left on the planet without live help and in that time I've already been asked if I want to close my account 3 times. :rolleyes:
 

kakata

Banned User - hyper flamming
PABaccred
PABnonaccred
PABnoaccred
Joined
Dec 2, 2006
Location
miami fl
I closed my account there...long ago.:thumbsup:
Couple years later I asked em to re-open it...they declained..they said Im a pain in the ass....lol:D:D
 

skiny

Banned User - violation of <a href="http://www.cas
Joined
Oct 30, 2008
Location
Canada
I think some of these casinos need more pain in the ass players.
 

Bencuri

Experienced Member
PABnononaccred
Joined
May 13, 2009
Location
Hungary
Well, 23% is terrific, indeed. Accoarding to my own experiences, I can say I wouldn't be surprised if the same would be proved by a professional check.
 

Pinababy69

RIP Lisa
Joined
Oct 15, 2004
Location
Toronto, Ontario - Canada
That was over several sessions. I ignored the first few. Then I started to get a bit peaved. Then I emailed.

I've read and been a part of all the high and low variance conversations and the good runs and bad runs. I've seen long term percentages in the 60s to 70s.

I fully understand over say 500 spins sitting in the 20s or I can 30s but if a casino's average payout percentage is even at 90% you would think that after a few thousand spins something has to start to level out. It really shouldn't just sit there session after session at 20 to 25%.

I've already given up on it. I've never hit zero so many times one session after another in my life. I'm not going to keep spinning here until I need a random jackpot just to break even. lol

When they said this was normal for slot games to have highs and lows. (I see no highs) I mentioned that I was going to ask here for more opinions. They said I was threatening them. I wasn't aware that discussing our game play with each other here was considered a threat.

We've sent 3 or 4 very short notes back and forth to each other via email since they're probably the only online casino left on the planet without live help and in that time I've already been asked if I want to close my account 3 times. :rolleyes:

The fact that it's over several sessions makes it even worse...way worse. If it were one session..I would still think that over 2K spins should have gotten you at least into the 60% range, even with a horrendous run of bad luck. But to "maintain" a 25% RTP over several sessions, with 2500 spins or more, does not seem right to me.

I am not one to judge a casino on whether I win there or not...but I do not blame you one bit for giving up on it after that. I'm afraid those kind of stats would deter even me.

I would love to hear KK's take on it...given his proficiency with stats...and how he tracks every single session he plays ie. number of spins, average bet, payout %, etc. I'd like to know if he has ever had that kind of return over several sessions, at one casino (any software).
 

chuchu59

gambling addict
PABnonaccred
CAG
Joined
Sep 26, 2004
Location
SOMEWHERE IN ASIA
The very least that Inetbet should have done was to agree that the sessions were very brutal and I have seen the likes of Enzo and a few other casino reps stating this. In most cases they offered free chips to pacify the customer. I am not suggesting that Inet should do this but to give players the cold shoulder after such a horrendous run is poor PR to say the least.

I am wondering, even if there was to be an upswing playing the same games, the extra number of spins that will bring Skiny back to a more respectable 85%. 10K spins? 15K spins?
 

skiny

Banned User - violation of <a href="http://www.cas
Joined
Oct 30, 2008
Location
Canada
I've heard before the game play at this casino was brutal but everyone gets a bad run from time to time.... Actually for me it's the other way around. I get a good run from time to time no matter where I play.

It's true that maybe given enough spins my return would increase. I've heard casinos before state that a few thousand spins isn't a good enough sampling and it takes a million spins before you get a true RTP.

Well, my bucket of quarters isn't that big.

Besides, that million spins should give you pretty much exactly the expected RTP. I'm not trying to park myself dead center of the expected RTP. It would be nice though after this many sessions and spins if I wasn't a hundred miles down the road from it sitting in the swamp. :rolleyes:

As for offers, the only thing this casino has offered to do is close my account 3 times.

About 6 emails with about one line each. Almost a slow motion version of live chat (which I can't understand why they don't have.) And in that time they almost seem to be trying to convince me to close my account.

Normally I would have closed my account a long time ago but since they seem so eager for me to ask for it I'm just being stubborn. :p
 

Mavin1

Dormant account
Joined
Jun 19, 2009
Location
Arizona
That was over several sessions. I ignored the first few. Then I started to get a bit peaved. Then I emailed.

I've read and been a part of all the high and low variance conversations and the good runs and bad runs. I've seen long term percentages in the 60s to 70s.

I can fully understand over say 500 spins sitting in the 20s or 30s but if a casino's average payout percentage is even at 90% you would think that after a few thousand spins something has to start to level out. It really shouldn't just sit there session after session at 20 to 25%.

I've already given up on it. I've never hit zero so many times one session after another in my life. I'm not going to keep spinning here until I need a random jackpot just to break even. lol

When they said this was normal for slot games to have highs and lows. (I see no highs) I mentioned that I was going to ask here for more opinions. They said I was threatening them. I wasn't aware that discussing our game play with each other here was considered a threat.

We've sent 3 or 4 very short notes back and forth to each other via email since they're probably the only online casino left on the planet without live help and in that time I've already been asked if I want to close my account 3 times. :rolleyes:


This comment reflects what has been said and discussed so many times on this forum regarding the RTP and as Silc would say "only to be poo pooed". The sad fact is many players are most likely getting these same results but keep playing because of the pipe dream that eventually the high will come. But I ask where is it? Yes a few players may hit them, but the majority of us are just paying to participate in our own demise, time and time again.
The one draw they have going for them is the random jackpot that keeps players coming back, but after hundreds of dead sessions even hitting a random will most likely never recoupe what has already been invested in a casino.

I have thought about posting a poll for the casino platform with the worst player return based on the players experiences, but not sure how to do one.
 

NASHVEGAS

Banned User - flamming, disrespecting admin,
Joined
Dec 10, 2006
Location
MERS
The very least that Inetbet should have done was to agree that the sessions were very brutal and I have seen the likes of Enzo and a few other casino reps stating this. In most cases they offered free chips to pacify the customer. I am not suggesting that Inet should do this but to give players the cold shoulder after such a horrendous run is poor PR to say the least.

I am wondering, even if there was to be an upswing playing the same games, the extra number of spins that will bring Skiny back to a more respectable 85%. 10K spins? 15K spins
Actually it may be possible on his very next spin but really need more info from Skiny to validate my assertion.;)
 

De Beuker

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2009
Location
Netherlands
Skiny, did you get this figure from the casino?
23% RTP seems impossible to me...that would truly be the mother of all nightmaresessions!:eek:

I'm a real dumbass when it comes to maths, maybe someone can provide a formula to calculate the RTP, but my personal worst session ever was on Rival, when I played through $189 with a $100 starting balance. (0.20/0.30 spins)
Those were alot less than 2500 spins and the RTP is still alot more than 23%..

For RTG, I've played loads of really bad sessions, but I cannot imagine I ever came close to a figure as low as 23%, never.
 

Cant_Get_Right

Banned User
Joined
Mar 9, 2010
Location
Atlanta
Skiny, did you get this figure from the casino?
23% RTP seems impossible to me...that would truly be the mother of all nightmaresessions!:eek:

I'm a real dumbass when it comes to maths, maybe someone can provide a formula to calculate the RTP, but my personal worst session ever was on Rival, when I played through $189 with a $100 starting balance. (0.20/0.30 spins)
Those were alot less than 2500 spins and the RTP is still alot more than 23%..

For RTG, I've played loads of really bad sessions, but I cannot imagine I ever came close to a figure as low as 23%, never.

YEP! I would never ever ever ever ever ever ever deposit into another rival again. I have had those type of returns all too much.
 

skiny

Banned User - violation of <a href="http://www.cas
Joined
Oct 30, 2008
Location
Canada
Actually it may be possible on his very next spin but really need more info from Skiny to validate my assertion.;)

I would agree with you 100% if I was playing the highest variance slot game in the universe but Honey To The Bee and Diamond Dozen don't normally make you hit zero for 2200 out of 2250 spins and then get it all back on your 2251st spin.

Skiny, did you get this figure from the casino?
23% RTP seems impossible to me...that would truly be the mother of all nightmaresessions!:eek:

I emailed iNetbet and asked for my payout percentage. 23% 2250 spins is what they sent me.

For RTG, I've played loads of really bad sessions, but I cannot imagine I ever came close to a figure as low as 23%, never.

I've had my share of good and bad runs with RTG. Even my really bad runs I'm sure I'm over the 50% mark. 23% over that many sessions is unprecedented for me.
 
Top