I want to do tests roulette system.

[lithis]

And where I wrote that I wanted influence the luck?

I want get the maximum benefit with my luck to. I have already cited two examples of the doubling of funds, in one of which my chances 48.65% and 40.35% in the other.
Of course I want to be my chance closer to 48.65%, and not 40%.

 

[Borgie]

Ok then off you go. Pulls up Deckchair, Settles back with icecream Look forward to the detailed results. Soon we may all be rich ! Or maybe poorer but only a bit poorer if we play our cards right. I had a dream .....

 

[Casinomeister]

And where I wrote that I wanted influence the luck?...

Here:

... But if I use a system that is unprofitable for 20%, then my luck will not help me win. Or I win less.

It's not in good form (nor is it a good idea) to become argumentative with the administrator of a forum - especially when one is a newbie (like yourself).

 

[rockycatt]

and that avatar is a real picture of him when he had his last conniption

 

[lithis]

But I do not argue with the forum rules or actions of the administrator.
I am expressing my views of losing for different styles the game of roulette. And I trying to defend my views, with calculation and examples.

If the forum will only be accepted they who hold identical views on all issues, and any attempt to challenge them, this is blasphemy, then forum for what? What to write here, If about anything is impossible dispute?

And going back to the discus - I do not write about the increase in the very best of luck, but about how to make the game less unprofitable. And if a player loses less, then, if he is lucky, difference between lost money and winnings money , will be more. So it turns out that increasing income from luck (and not increasing luck).

Take the example of a coin. Let's say you're playing against another player flip a coin, but you have two options.
The first option, when you lose give away $ 1, and when you win get $ 0.95.
The second option, when you lose give away $ 1, and when you win get $ 0.80.

Which option will you choose? Or you say that it does not matter? I think that you choose the first option.

An example given by me, about the same. Yes, this is a little harder, but the principle is the same - two ways to double your money, but income casino will be different (and thus loss the player, too).

 

[KasinoKing]

And going back to the discus - I do not write about the increase in the very best of luck, but about how to make the game less unprofitable. And if a player loses less, then, if he is lucky, difference between lost money and winnings money , will be more. So it turns out that increasing income from luck (and not increasing luck).

I DO get where you're coming from.
I think the problem some see (including CasinoMeister) is that you mentioned "systems".

As I said earlier:
"Assuming you will be playing European Roulette (only 1 Zero) then whichever system you choose, your long term loss will be 2.7027027% of everything you wager, no matter when, where or how you place your bets. *
* Speed of loss may vary with the amount of luck received."

No system will increase your chances of winning, and equally no system will give you "less chance of losing " than any other.
The odds on ANY bet placed in ANY way at ANY time is still the same.

Anyway - it's up to you to do exactly as you wish.
I hope you have good fun and lots of luck in your endeavours!

KK

 

[Nifty29]

But I do not argue with the forum rules or actions of the administrator.
I am expressing my views of losing for different styles the game of roulette. And I trying to defend my views, with calculation and examples.

If the forum will only be accepted they who hold identical views on all issues, and any attempt to challenge them, this is blasphemy, then forum for what? What to write here, If about anything is impossible dispute?

And going back to the discus - I do not write about the increase in the very best of luck, but about how to make the game less unprofitable. And if a player loses less, then, if he is lucky, difference between lost money and winnings mone@y , will be more. So it turns out that increasing income from luck (and not increasing luck).

Take the example of a coin. Let's say you're playing against another player flip a coin, but you have two options.
The first option, when you lose give away $ 1, and when you win get $ 0.95.
The second option, when you lose give away $ 1, and when you win get $ 0.80.

Which option will you choose? Or you say that it does not matter? I think that you choose the first option.

An example given by me, about the same. Yes, this is a little harder, but the principle is the same - two ways to double your money, but income casino will be different (and thus loss the player, too).

Blasphemy??

You didn't say "Jehovah" did you??? (Max...?? LOL)

As I said, its all well and good you want to post your results, but until they number in the millions they aren't going to mean much.

As KK said, there is NO way to improve your odds at roulette. It just isn't possible, unless you find a casino offering more generous odds. How you bet I.e. using a system makes NO difference. I see you tried martingale....did you figure out that the table limits make it redundant?

No offence, but all of this roulette system/stats/etc is one big YAWN to most members.....its been done before.

 

[Seventh777]

Blasphemy??

You didn't say "Jehovah" did you??? (Max...?? LOL)

Speaking of blasphemy, i`ve heard Salman Rushdie has just finished his new book.......Buddha - you fat bastid .

 

[lithis]

To KasinoKing

I agree that "the odds on ANY bet placed in ANY way at ANY time is still the same".

I agree that "the long term loss will be 2.7027027% of everything you wager".

But I say that to achieve the same result (in this case, doubling the money in the account), you may need a different amount of bets. And as the loss will be 2.7027027% of everything you wager, then the losses in relation to the amount of money in the account will be different.

I have already mentioned the example of $ 512 for two options:
In the first case the entire amount in the account is put on red - lost 2.7% of $ 512.
In the second case, game is on Martingale system with an initial rate of $ 1 - in order to double the money in the account, you need to make 1013 bets, totaling $ 3664. And the losses will be 2.7% of $ 3664

And in both cases the result will be one - doubling the amount in the account. If you are lucky. Only it turns out that the probability that the player is lucky and he can win $ 512, and not lose them, in the first case to be 48.65% and 40.35% in the second.


To Nifty29.

I'm not about increasing the chances of winning. I write about how not to increase the likelihood of loss.

As for the one million spins - so therefore I want to offer another users share their results, to gather as much data. Certainly not a million, but still more than I am able to collect self.

 

[LaHutti]

If you walk in, hit the table, put everything you own on Red....if you're lucky, you'll double your money.
The chance of that happening is 48.65%...the excact number you're trying to achive with your system. Chances are tho, that you won't hit Red, because the casino has an edge, and therefore you'll be done really fast.
This system saves you a lot of time, a lot of doing math, and I'm giving it to you for free.

 

[lithis]

If you walk in, hit the table, put everything you own on Red....if you're lucky, you'll double your money.
The chance of that happening is 48.65%...the excact number you're trying to achive with your system. Chances are tho, that you won't hit Red, because the casino has an edge, and therefore you'll be done really fast.
This system saves you a lot of time, a lot of doing math, and I'm giving it to you for free.

This is understandable, but it's very boring. I'm going to the casino to have fun.
And I'm not prepared to make a bet and leave the casino.
So me and are interested in how to play longer, but so that my chances of winning certain amount, been almost the same as in the short game.

 

[Casinomeister]

This is understandable, but it's very boring. I'm going to the casino to have fun.
And I'm not prepared to make a bet and leave the casino.
So me and are interested in how to play longer, but so that my chances of winning certain amount, been almost the same as in the short game.

If you want to have fun, why do so much math? Having fun is making ridiculous bets (betting on red because you are drinking a strawberry margarita - putting all your chips on the same number a babe-licious babe is betting on). Analyzing game play for millions of spins is not my idea of fun. But that's me.

 

[Nifty29]

This is understandable, but it's very boring. I'm going to the casino to have fun.
And I'm not prepared to make a bet and leave the casino.
So me and are interested in how to play longer, but so that my chances of winning certain amount, been almost the same as in the short game.

Maybe when you play 100k rounds and record intricate details of each, and smash them against 100k rounds that someone else has also spent 100's of hours recording, you might find the Higgs Moron.

 

[lithis]

If you want to have fun, why do so much math? Having fun is making ridiculous bets (betting on red because you are drinking a strawberry margarita - putting all your chips on the same number a babe-licious babe is betting on). Analyzing game play for millions of spins is not my idea of fun. But that's me.

Enjoyment of the game, I see above all to get a win. And the more I receive it, the more fun.
And if I come to casino that the lose every time, this little nice.

 

[Borgie]

I can not find the symbol for bashing head against a brick wall - is there one?

 

[BingoT]

I can not find the symbol for bashing head against a brick wall - is there one?

Here is the wall.....

 

[Seventh777]

Maybe when you play 100k rounds and record intricate details of each, and smash them against 100k rounds that someone else has also spent 100's of hours recording, you might find the Higgs Moron.

Plus two others you haven`t catered for .

 

[rockycatt]

why not pick up a table of your own and see how you can rig the game from a players side
and do experiments on physical properties of the game , cause on line is a horse of a different color

 

[lithis]

Yeah, long time since I not communicated on the forums.
I've already forgotten how hard it is to convey his words to those who hear only their own.

 

[Casinomeister]

Yeah, long time since I not communicated on the forums.
I've already forgotten how hard it is to convey his words to those who hear only their own.

Hiya - it's only been a day, so please don't feel guilty. And we don't really hear words since typing is only a typing sound clicking away on the keyboard. I can't make any sense of it at all when I close my eyes.luhgnjepo98rh oops.