- Joined
- Sep 26, 2004
- Location
- SOMEWHERE IN ASIA
Chatmaster,Chatmaster said:m249a
I am indeed Poker333 on the PA forum. I have been representing Piggs Peak Poker / Poker333 on this matter. I honestly didn't need your 2 times poster remarks as this doesn't concern this matter at all. I haven't made it a secret that I was representing Poker333 at any time. However Chatmaster is my personal alias I have been using on a personal matter on forums all over the internet. Unforutunately the last thing I want is that Bryan does a IP check and find that I tried to pull trick #9 and ban me. I have edited my user description in that regard. Perhaps that will clarefy the missunderstanding.
Please understand one thing, mudslinging is not my speciality therefore I do not plan to reply to any of the slimy remarks made by Ippa2004. That seems to be his tactic on this matter, I prefer that Bryan have a look at this matter, and clarify what has happened here. If the mistake was made on our side by all means we will learn our lesson and admit to it.
To clear a few things up, Ippa2004 was not booted from chat because of collusion via chat therefore he is NO THIEF! It was for remarks and foul language made in the chat. He was blocked from chat by Prima after a number of complaints by players.
Imnotac,- The question about why didn't we just pay him the $20?
The moment we did that knowing that we did nothing wrong put us in a position where we allowed a person to blackmail (OUR POINT OF VIEW) us successfully for a lousy $20. He has threatened us that he was going to post us on every forum he could find. Which we felt he would have done anyway based on the correspondance we had with him from day one. He actually went out of his way to damage our poker room even after he was allowed withdrawing his money,... look at his heading on every forum he posted. Almost the same. "DONT BE RIPPED OFF" We are thieves? Sorry based on who's judgement? It is pointless to have any discussion with this guy.
I am not sure whether I am correct but if he never completed the required raked hands for the bonus,then why was he allowed to withdraw twice earlier. If he didnt complete the required raked hands for the current session,you can only keep his $3.06 but not the new deposit of $20 because he wasnt awarded a bonus. It would seem that even if Ippa did not complete his raked hands,you waived this requirement by allowing him to withdraw. If the bonus is only for the current $3.06,you cannot confiscate his newly deposited $20 otherwise you can say they are 'sticky bonuses'.