Hyper-Wins Screenshots (10,000x Stake Plus)

chiya

Senior Member
PABnononaccred
Joined
Nov 7, 2012
Location
Earth
:D

Ah I know the feeling. Being slightly disappointed with a huge win lol. Just the fact that it could have been on a higher stake leaves you feeling a little cheated, we're hard to please as a species :laugh:

Just make sure to spend all the winnings on something nice and all will be good ;)
It wouldn't have landed on the bigger stake so it doesn't matter.
 

chiya

Senior Member
PABnononaccred
Joined
Nov 7, 2012
Location
Earth
Of course it would (or could) :D See my older post. Mega Wins - Min 3000x Bet

I know it is only X 8211, but that is quite good for DoA and it was on 0.9 USD bet :)
That's not what I mean. The random number generator is constantly running on the background of a slot. When you hit spin, the result is decided. If you hit spin a fraction of a second later, the result would already be different. Which means if you had taken the time to increase bet, it would not have landed. Or if it had, it would've had a different result.

There's no point to think "why didn't I increase bet" etc because what you got you wouldn't have got had you increased bet.
 

stokes

Experienced Greenhorn
Joined
Oct 10, 2006
Location
Springfield
That's not what I mean. The random number generator is constantly running on the background of a slot. When you hit spin, the result is decided. If you hit spin a fraction of a second later, the result would already be different. Which means if you had taken the time to increase bet, it would not have landed. Or if it had, it would've had a different result.

There's no point to think "why didn't I increase bet" etc because what you got you wouldn't have got had you increased bet.
I did not mean to increase the bet just before the big win. I meant that I was constantly switching between 0.45 and 0.90 USD bets, so I had like 50 on smaller bet than 50 on higher which means the big win could have been easily on higher bet.

Anyway, I am happy with what I got :)
 

smart_croatia

Senior Member
PABnoaccred
Joined
Dec 12, 2017
Location
Croatia
These DOAII wins on mere cents bets are just sick!

I knew the game is going to bomb but it is even better. It actually went off like a massive bomb. :D
yep its sick what this slots is giving, first time we see real potential in play not just on paytable, so many plps got sick wins in short period of time since release, I hope you will post one here on your stakes :D
 

chiya

Senior Member
PABnononaccred
Joined
Nov 7, 2012
Location
Earth
Of course it could have...
Yeah I should've clarified on that post but you know someone already quoted me weeks ago and I already replied to them, indicating what I meant. And you especially if anyone should know that I am right. I'm not saying it can't land on a bigger stake I'm saying that very result would not have happened if they had took the time to raise their stake.
 

trancemonkey

Ueber Meister
Joined
Mar 29, 2013
Location
United Kingdom
Yeah I should've clarified on that post but you know someone already quoted me weeks ago and I already replied to them, indicating what I meant. And you especially if anyone should know that I am right. I'm not saying it can't land on a bigger stake I'm saying that very result would not have happened if they had took the time to raise their stake.
Why couldn't it?
 

chiya

Senior Member
PABnononaccred
Joined
Nov 7, 2012
Location
Earth
Why couldn't it?
Why are you being difficult for no reason? Is it too much to ask you to read what I had originally written in response to someone?

Or are you saying you have some inner knowledge of how slots actually work, and that the result isn't decided the moment you push the spin button in fact incorrect? Because as far as I know, the random number generator in the background is constantly generating new results. When you push spin, the result is decided. Had you taken even a 0.1 seconds more to push it, you'd have landed on a different result.

Yeah just like you *can* win the Jackpot two times in row doesn't mean you will, and it is so improbable that you might as well say it is impossible to land on the result that they posted, if they had taken the time to increase the bet.
 

trancemonkey

Ueber Meister
Joined
Mar 29, 2013
Location
United Kingdom
I'm gathering they mean, because in the half second it took to change the bet the rng would have produced a different result by dint of the cycles run though in that fraction of a second ie probabillity not so much as possibility
Well yes, in that case it "might" not have happened. But that is not what was said... if they had been playing on a higher bet and pressed the start button at the exact same time as they did, then the outcome would have been the same multiple of stake.

You may as well say "If they had sneezed 5 seconds before pressing start they wouldn't have got the same result" because that is also true.
 
Last edited:

chiya

Senior Member
PABnononaccred
Joined
Nov 7, 2012
Location
Earth
That still literally makes no sense. If they had been playing on a higher bet, they would've not pushed the start button at the exact time for the sole reason of it taking time to increase the bet size.
 

dionysus

Contest Manager
Staff member
CAG
MM
Joined
Apr 27, 2009
Location
the land of snow and maple syrup
That still literally makes no sense. If they had been playing on a higher bet, they would've not pushed the start button at the exact time for the sole reason of it taking time to increase the bet size.
I think, here, it's just two people coming at this from 2 different perspectives - like I mentioned, probability v possibility but i see where both are coming from.

In all LIKELIHOOD, it would have been an entirely different outcome which is why players in the know stress onto other players who say 'gosh, if only i'd have bet bigger' - if you had taken the time to have raised your bet, in all LIKELIHOOD, youd have had a different outcome, simply because the fraction of a second between raising stakes would have produced an entirely different result, bearing in mind 2 things
1 - the same outcome COULD have occurred because of randomness (just highly unlikely it would ever have produced an identical result)
2 - it may have produced a BETTER result (or conversely, a poorer one)

I think it's just being boggled down in semantics :)
but end of day, it's pointless to dwell on may or may not have beens and just enjoy the ride :)
 
Sponsored Area by

Visit Casino

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 2)

Top