Try saying the bold bit aloud and tell me if it makes sense ?
Well you can always use swiftspins. It's a script that runs on browser and enables removed features for slots even in the UK. It's intended to restore quickspins but i hear it also restores bonus buy functionality and I'm sure that after this update, also auto-play.
Access to Swift Spins is done so on educational purposes only. We strongly advise you thoroughly check the terms and conditions of the casino you are playing at if you are using our tool.
We do not take any responsibility for the use of Swift Spins in any capacity. Use of this tool is done so entirely at your own risk.
Is Swiftspins still going? I tried this months ago and it only seemed to be working on (quite aptly) Quickspin slots, and none of the other providers mentioned. I checked back for updates in the following weeks and nothing, so I assumed it was an abandoned project...Well you can always use swiftspins. It's a script that runs on browser and enables removed features for slots even in the UK. It's intended to restore quickspins but i hear it also restores bonus buy functionality and I'm sure that after this update, also auto-play.
Yeah it's a total sack of crap, as we both surmised in slightly different ways, if a 15 year old submitted the UKGC's report as a piece of GCSE homework their teacher would ceremonially set fire to it on the spot and arrange to have the pupil expelled for being dangerously witless.
At Halloween I am going to set my monthly deposit limit at £1 per month at every casino that I play at except paddy power for my sports betting where I will have a modest monthly limit that should cover a months worth of losses on sports betting alone.
Feck the UKGC. I can see our deposit limits being heavily policed for us anyway in the not too distant future so this will just help me get used to finding other means of entertaining myself.
Like porn. I don't think anyone will limit that any time soon
I don't understand why the big firms don't group together and take the decision to judicial review, the ukgc have put the change to consultation, received an overwhelming negative response and then simply ignored it, so it was a sham exercise with a predetermined outcome/conclusion.