My God - I've just stumbled into the Twilight Zone
You kind of did lol
Casinos
Casinos By Status
Popular Filters
By Banking Options
Games
All Games
Bonuses
Popular Bonus Filters
Forums
Popular Forums
Forum User Features
Complaints
Submit A Complaint (PAB)
PAB Rules and Guidelines
Browse PABs
Gambling News
Popular News Sections
Glenn Beck Warns of one-world government!
- Thread starter RobWin
- Start date
You kind of did lol
LOL, no worries Cheryl, just remind me not to flirt with you should I forget...
____
____
Listen , you know who I saw in the grocery store Today? Remember congressman Mark Foley? He was in his jogging suit. He looked terrible. Like he aged ten years.LOL, no worries Cheryl, just remind me not to flirt with you should I forget...
____
____
My God - I've just stumbled into the Twilight Zone
Jet, when you get a minute watch that video that I posted the link to in my very first post here in this thread and tell me what you think about it all mate, it's only about 12 or so minutes long..
____
____
bryand
Beach Bum
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2008
- Location
- Just Across the Hudson River
Post not necessary.
Last edited:
I actually thought you for one would be interested in this Glenn Beck piece and video Bryan, did you even watch it...
____
____
bryand
Beach Bum
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2008
- Location
- Just Across the Hudson River
I actually thought you for one would be interested in this Glenn Beck piece and video Bryan, did you even watch it...
____
____
I enjoyed watching it.
The post I deleted was regarding the misunderstanding between you, Cheryl and Rambler (which was sorted out while I was typing).
bryand
Beach Bum
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2008
- Location
- Just Across the Hudson River
Ron Paul finally gets his way
WASHINGTON -- Political frustration over the rescue of Wall Street and high unemployment erupted in the House Thursday, with one committee threatening to impose tighter scrutiny on the Federal Reserve and another trading verbal insults with Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner.
The House Financial Services Committee voted, 43-26, to approve a measure sponsored by Texas Republican Ron Paul, vociferously opposed by the Fed, that would direct the congressional Government Accountability Office to expand its audits of the Fed to include decisions about interest rates and lending to individual banks. The Fed says the provision threatens its ability to make monetary policy without political interference.
WASHINGTON -- Political frustration over the rescue of Wall Street and high unemployment erupted in the House Thursday, with one committee threatening to impose tighter scrutiny on the Federal Reserve and another trading verbal insults with Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner.
The House Financial Services Committee voted, 43-26, to approve a measure sponsored by Texas Republican Ron Paul, vociferously opposed by the Fed, that would direct the congressional Government Accountability Office to expand its audits of the Fed to include decisions about interest rates and lending to individual banks. The Fed says the provision threatens its ability to make monetary policy without political interference.
You do not have permission to view link
Log in or register now.
Was this uproar related to the recent screw-ups that have apparently been made by various agencies distributing the taxpayers' monies to banks etc?
If so I can understand the anger directed at Geithner, who as Treasury Secretary I guess carries the can ultimately on bail-out issues.
If so I can understand the anger directed at Geithner, who as Treasury Secretary I guess carries the can ultimately on bail-out issues.
John Bolton states he agrees to the "Risk of American Sovereignty"
Five part Discussion about 'One World Government Climate Treaty' between Glenn Beck, John Bolton & Lord Monckton
Interviews start at 4:15 minutes into the video just in-case you want to skip ahead....The 181 page framework draft of the "Climate Treaty" is opened for discussion.
Video 1 Annex 1, paragraph 38 refers to the "One World Global Government"
Video 2 Paragraph 36 Annex 1 Shows of the Closing Down of FREE MARKETS and a 2% Tax on every financial transaction in the United States. (excerpt from treaty draft): "It should include a financial mechanism and a facilitative mechanism drawn up to facilitate the design, adoption and carrying out of public policies, as the prevailing instrument, to which the market rules and related dynamics should be subordinate"
Video 3 Law of the Sea Treaty exampled here...It was also never ratified by the Senate but still the State Dept. upholds it as it will this new "Climate Treaty" should it be signed by our President!!
Video 4 Lord Monckton addresses the CO2 and .7 degree delema...
Video 5 MIT Scientists findings discussed...
From Annex 1, Paragraph 38 "The government will be ruled by the COP" Anyone besides me know what the "COP" stands for?
I have a copy of this 181 page treaty draft in .pdf format, if anyone is interested in seeing it first hand then just let me know.
I do have to say that it would be nice to have some educated and intelligent discussion on all of this if anyone here is willing...I'm actually surprised that this thread has been derailed as it has so far...but whatever...anyone up to some discussion on this "Global Climate Treaty" and it's implications it will have on us and the world and is there anything we can do to help ourselves now from becoming a future citizen of this "One World Government" ?
____
____
Five part Discussion about 'One World Government Climate Treaty' between Glenn Beck, John Bolton & Lord Monckton
Interviews start at 4:15 minutes into the video just in-case you want to skip ahead....The 181 page framework draft of the "Climate Treaty" is opened for discussion.
Video 1 Annex 1, paragraph 38 refers to the "One World Global Government"
Video 2 Paragraph 36 Annex 1 Shows of the Closing Down of FREE MARKETS and a 2% Tax on every financial transaction in the United States. (excerpt from treaty draft): "It should include a financial mechanism and a facilitative mechanism drawn up to facilitate the design, adoption and carrying out of public policies, as the prevailing instrument, to which the market rules and related dynamics should be subordinate"
Video 3 Law of the Sea Treaty exampled here...It was also never ratified by the Senate but still the State Dept. upholds it as it will this new "Climate Treaty" should it be signed by our President!!
Video 4 Lord Monckton addresses the CO2 and .7 degree delema...
Video 5 MIT Scientists findings discussed...
From Annex 1, Paragraph 38 "The government will be ruled by the COP" Anyone besides me know what the "COP" stands for?
I have a copy of this 181 page treaty draft in .pdf format, if anyone is interested in seeing it first hand then just let me know.
I do have to say that it would be nice to have some educated and intelligent discussion on all of this if anyone here is willing...I'm actually surprised that this thread has been derailed as it has so far...but whatever...anyone up to some discussion on this "Global Climate Treaty" and it's implications it will have on us and the world and is there anything we can do to help ourselves now from becoming a future citizen of this "One World Government" ?
____
____
Last edited by a moderator:
FASCISM ALERT! One little piece at a time!
The chipping away of our Sovereignty rights is happening right under us and the sad thing is, is that this is happening with our "Eyes Wide Shut"!
Obama is pushing for the ratification of another little know 12 year old treaty that would take away more of our Sovereignty rights...and yet put this under control of the elusive "One World Government"!
But as Lou Dobbs states, "And no one can blame President Obama, for we have only ourselves to blame because he has made it very clear as has his attorney general, they just want to do a few things with gun laws...as in take them away"
____
____
The chipping away of our Sovereignty rights is happening right under us and the sad thing is, is that this is happening with our "Eyes Wide Shut"!
Obama is pushing for the ratification of another little know 12 year old treaty that would take away more of our Sovereignty rights...and yet put this under control of the elusive "One World Government"!
But as Lou Dobbs states, "And no one can blame President Obama, for we have only ourselves to blame because he has made it very clear as has his attorney general, they just want to do a few things with gun laws...as in take them away"
____
____
Last edited by a moderator:
The perfect example of the American public sitting on their ass on the couch eating pizza while we just let all of this shit that is now starting to come into place just happen right under our noses!
Listen carefully at 3:27
Listen carefully at 3:27
Last edited by a moderator:
From page 138 of the treaty draft, paragraph 28.
3. A global fund to support a global-feed-in-tariff programme:
28. A global fund shall be established to support a global feed-in tariff programme, providing guaranteed purchase prices
When they start talking of "guaranteed purchase prices" ...then, right there goes Capitalism and Free Trade!
____
____
3. A global fund to support a global-feed-in-tariff programme:
28. A global fund shall be established to support a global feed-in tariff programme, providing guaranteed purchase prices
When they start talking of "guaranteed purchase prices" ...then, right there goes Capitalism and Free Trade!
____
____
Obama All Set To Sign Off On Treaty
By H. JOSEF HEBERT Associated Press Writer The Associated Press
Wednesday, November 25, 2009 6:21 PM EST
WASHINGTON (AP) Putting his prestige on the line, President Barack Obama will personally commit the U.S. to a goal of substantially cutting greenhouse gases at next month's Copenhagen climate summit. He will insist America is ready to tackle global warming despite resistance in Congress over higher costs for businesses and homeowners.
Obama will attend the start of the conference Dec. 9, a week from next Wednesday, before heading to Oslo to accept the Nobel Peace Prize. He will "put on the table" a U.S. commitment to cut emissions by 17 percent over the next decade, on the way to reducing heat-trapping pollution by 80 percent by mid-century, the White House said.
Cutting U.S. carbon dioxide emissions by one-sixth in just a decade would be likely to hike energy bills, but the administration says there would be important health trade-offs.
Carol Browner, Obama's assistant for energy and climate change, cited a $173-per-year estimated cost in a briefing Wednesday a figure for a family of four calculated by the Congressional Budget Office. Republicans say costs would be higher.
But slashing carbon dioxide emissions could save millions of lives, mostly by reducing preventable deaths from heart and lung diseases, according to studies published this week in The Lancet British medical journal.
The White House said Obama's decision to attend the international conference in Denmark was "a sign of his continuing commitment and leadership to find a global solution to the global threat of climate change."
But Obama's stopover on the conference's second day instead of later when negotiations will be most intense and when most other national leaders will take part disappointed some European and U.N. climate officials, as well as some environmentalists.
Others said Obama's personal appeal will resonate with the delegates from more than 75 countries and help reset the U.S. image on the climate issue after eight years in which the Bush administration staunchly opposed mandatory reductions in greenhouse gases.
Yvo de Boer, the United Nations climate chief, said it is important for the United States to establish emissions reduction targets and a financial commitment to helping developing countries address climate change.
"If he comes in the first week to announce that, it would be a major boost to the conference," de Boer told The Associated Press. He said Obama's participation was critical because delegates "are looking to the United States to come forward."
The president's first trip to Copenhagen just last month was less than fruitful. He made an unsuccessful pitch for the 2016 Summer Olympics to be held in Chicago.
Obama's participation had been in doubt since it became clear that the Dec. 7-18 conference was unlikely to produce a binding agreement, The original goal of the conference was to produce a new global climate change treaty to replace the 1997 Kyoto Protocol. But in recent weeks it became clear that delegates were likely to produce at best an outline for an agreement to be considered late next year.
The White House said Obama's commitment to a 17 percent emissions cut from 2005 levels by 2020 would be the first step toward an 80 percent reduction outlined in legislation before Congress. It said Obama is expecting "robust mitigation contributions" from China and other emerging nations as part of any final agreement.
Obama pressed for cooperation on climate change in meetings with Chinese President Hu Jintao in Beijing last week, and with Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, during a state visit at the White House Tuesday.
China's top climate envoy said Wednesday his nation would seek binding pollution targets for developed countries but reject similar requirements for itself at the summit.
Yu Qingtai said it would be unfair for all countries to be required to combat global warming since most of the environmental damage has been caused by developed nations during their industrialization over the past 100 to 200 years.
The White House said it will send a half-dozen Cabinet secretaries to the talks, including Energy Secretary Steven Chu and Commerce Secretary Gary Locke, as well as the head of the Environmental Protection Agency, which is preparing regulations to cut greenhouse gases.
Asked about China's commitment, Chu said Wednesday there has been a major change in the past two years in China's recognition that it must address climate change. "You look at what China is doing, it's incredibly impressive," said Chu, citing the country's push for renewable energy sources and energy efficiency, and its plans to reduce carbon emissions at a rate pegged to economic growth.
As for the Copenhagen talks, Chu said, "Nobody expects developing countries ... to do things that a developed country has the capability of doing." Chu was interviewed Wednesday by two reporters, including The Associated Press, for a program to be aired Sunday on C-SPAN.
The high-profile delegation is intended to reinforce Obama's stance, despite the bitter debate in Congress. The House narrowly passed legislation requiring a cap on greenhouse gases from power plants and industry, but it's still unclear whether Senate Democrats will be able to muster the 60 votes needed to approve a similar bill.
Action in the Senate has been put off until next spring, although negotiators are continuing to seek a compromise to attract some Republicans and centrist Democrats who have criticized the House legislation. Opponents say they're worried about the legislation's effect on energy prices and the overall economy.
Administration officials don't want to repeat the mistake of Kyoto, when the U.S. agreed to emission reductions but never implemented them because of strong political opposition at home. The U.S. never ratified the Kyoto agreement.
Most environmentalists hailed Obama's decision to go to Copenhagen, even if it's early in the conference. They said it will help set the tone of the talks and reverse America's image internationally on climate change.
Said Michael Oppenheimer, a professor of geoscience and international affairs at Princeton University: "The U.S. has stood as the bad guy for so long that it's critically important for the U.S. president to set the tone for the meeting."
But Kyle Ash, climate policy adviser for Greenpeace USA, said Obama should be even more involved, and later in the conference. "The Copenhagen climate summit is not about a photo opportunity. It's about getting a global agreement to stop climate chaos. President Obama needs to be there at the same time as all the other wold leaders," he said.
Associated Press Writers Seth Borenstein and Julie Pace in Washington, and Jan Olsen in Copenhagen contributed to this report.
____
____
You do not have permission to view link
Log in or register now.
By H. JOSEF HEBERT Associated Press Writer The Associated Press
Wednesday, November 25, 2009 6:21 PM EST
WASHINGTON (AP) Putting his prestige on the line, President Barack Obama will personally commit the U.S. to a goal of substantially cutting greenhouse gases at next month's Copenhagen climate summit. He will insist America is ready to tackle global warming despite resistance in Congress over higher costs for businesses and homeowners.
Obama will attend the start of the conference Dec. 9, a week from next Wednesday, before heading to Oslo to accept the Nobel Peace Prize. He will "put on the table" a U.S. commitment to cut emissions by 17 percent over the next decade, on the way to reducing heat-trapping pollution by 80 percent by mid-century, the White House said.
Cutting U.S. carbon dioxide emissions by one-sixth in just a decade would be likely to hike energy bills, but the administration says there would be important health trade-offs.
Carol Browner, Obama's assistant for energy and climate change, cited a $173-per-year estimated cost in a briefing Wednesday a figure for a family of four calculated by the Congressional Budget Office. Republicans say costs would be higher.
But slashing carbon dioxide emissions could save millions of lives, mostly by reducing preventable deaths from heart and lung diseases, according to studies published this week in The Lancet British medical journal.
The White House said Obama's decision to attend the international conference in Denmark was "a sign of his continuing commitment and leadership to find a global solution to the global threat of climate change."
But Obama's stopover on the conference's second day instead of later when negotiations will be most intense and when most other national leaders will take part disappointed some European and U.N. climate officials, as well as some environmentalists.
Others said Obama's personal appeal will resonate with the delegates from more than 75 countries and help reset the U.S. image on the climate issue after eight years in which the Bush administration staunchly opposed mandatory reductions in greenhouse gases.
Yvo de Boer, the United Nations climate chief, said it is important for the United States to establish emissions reduction targets and a financial commitment to helping developing countries address climate change.
"If he comes in the first week to announce that, it would be a major boost to the conference," de Boer told The Associated Press. He said Obama's participation was critical because delegates "are looking to the United States to come forward."
The president's first trip to Copenhagen just last month was less than fruitful. He made an unsuccessful pitch for the 2016 Summer Olympics to be held in Chicago.
Obama's participation had been in doubt since it became clear that the Dec. 7-18 conference was unlikely to produce a binding agreement, The original goal of the conference was to produce a new global climate change treaty to replace the 1997 Kyoto Protocol. But in recent weeks it became clear that delegates were likely to produce at best an outline for an agreement to be considered late next year.
The White House said Obama's commitment to a 17 percent emissions cut from 2005 levels by 2020 would be the first step toward an 80 percent reduction outlined in legislation before Congress. It said Obama is expecting "robust mitigation contributions" from China and other emerging nations as part of any final agreement.
Obama pressed for cooperation on climate change in meetings with Chinese President Hu Jintao in Beijing last week, and with Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, during a state visit at the White House Tuesday.
China's top climate envoy said Wednesday his nation would seek binding pollution targets for developed countries but reject similar requirements for itself at the summit.
Yu Qingtai said it would be unfair for all countries to be required to combat global warming since most of the environmental damage has been caused by developed nations during their industrialization over the past 100 to 200 years.
The White House said it will send a half-dozen Cabinet secretaries to the talks, including Energy Secretary Steven Chu and Commerce Secretary Gary Locke, as well as the head of the Environmental Protection Agency, which is preparing regulations to cut greenhouse gases.
Asked about China's commitment, Chu said Wednesday there has been a major change in the past two years in China's recognition that it must address climate change. "You look at what China is doing, it's incredibly impressive," said Chu, citing the country's push for renewable energy sources and energy efficiency, and its plans to reduce carbon emissions at a rate pegged to economic growth.
As for the Copenhagen talks, Chu said, "Nobody expects developing countries ... to do things that a developed country has the capability of doing." Chu was interviewed Wednesday by two reporters, including The Associated Press, for a program to be aired Sunday on C-SPAN.
The high-profile delegation is intended to reinforce Obama's stance, despite the bitter debate in Congress. The House narrowly passed legislation requiring a cap on greenhouse gases from power plants and industry, but it's still unclear whether Senate Democrats will be able to muster the 60 votes needed to approve a similar bill.
Action in the Senate has been put off until next spring, although negotiators are continuing to seek a compromise to attract some Republicans and centrist Democrats who have criticized the House legislation. Opponents say they're worried about the legislation's effect on energy prices and the overall economy.
Administration officials don't want to repeat the mistake of Kyoto, when the U.S. agreed to emission reductions but never implemented them because of strong political opposition at home. The U.S. never ratified the Kyoto agreement.
Most environmentalists hailed Obama's decision to go to Copenhagen, even if it's early in the conference. They said it will help set the tone of the talks and reverse America's image internationally on climate change.
Said Michael Oppenheimer, a professor of geoscience and international affairs at Princeton University: "The U.S. has stood as the bad guy for so long that it's critically important for the U.S. president to set the tone for the meeting."
But Kyle Ash, climate policy adviser for Greenpeace USA, said Obama should be even more involved, and later in the conference. "The Copenhagen climate summit is not about a photo opportunity. It's about getting a global agreement to stop climate chaos. President Obama needs to be there at the same time as all the other wold leaders," he said.
Associated Press Writers Seth Borenstein and Julie Pace in Washington, and Jan Olsen in Copenhagen contributed to this report.
____
____
bryand
Beach Bum
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2008
- Location
- Just Across the Hudson River
Hey Rob, can you help decipher this damn article about a one-world government?
There'll be nowhere to run from the new world government
There'll be nowhere to run from the new world government
You do not have permission to view link
Log in or register now.
Yea, thanks for that Bryan. I hadn't read it till you posted here. I thought it was a good article with a lot of the authors views on "Global" and "World Governance" all compiled into sporadic thoughts but still with meat attached to them.
The comment section has some very good views and opinions as well and a few far fetched one's too! I am still reading through the comments. Some are very interesting.
____
____
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
-
Yo Guest! It's beer o'clock!! It's time to get yer drink on! -
REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do diddly squat without having been registered!
At the moment you have limited access to view most discussions: you can't make contact with thousands of fellow players, affiliates, casino reps, and all sorts of other riff-raff.
Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Casinomeister here!