1. By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies .This website or its third-party tools use cookies, which are necessary to its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy.Find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Follow Casinomeister on Twitter | Facebook | YouTube | Casinomeister.us US Residents Click here! |  Svenska Svenska | 
Dismiss Notice

Poll:Best Screenshot of the Month?



Candidates Revealed...Cast your vote!.
Dismiss Notice
REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do diddly squat without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view most discussions: you can't make contact with thousands of fellow players, affiliates, casino reps, and all sorts of other riff-raff.

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Casinomeister here!

Glad to see CasinoWebcam made the list!

Discussion in 'Ask the Meister' started by fast_eddie, Aug 24, 2005.

    Aug 24, 2005
  1. fast_eddie

    fast_eddie Dormant account

    Bryan, Glad to see CasinoWebcam made the list. Was wondering what recent dealing you had with them that lead to them being put on the accredited list? As I said in one of my previous posts I've had nothing but pleasurable experiences when dealing with them. Customer service has been great, the pit boss has been very helpful answering any questions I've had and most of all I've cashed out and received my check with no problems. An if anyone who plays there wants to chat, my player name is Mr. K. I can usually be found at the roultete wheel or bacccaret table. Also as a side note, keep a look out for the dealer Gabriela, my favorite. She almost makes losing o.k. ;) and the other dealers are great too. Hope to see some friends there. Congrats to Casino Webcam for making the list. :thumbsup:
     
  2. Aug 24, 2005
  3. dominique

    dominique Dormant account

    Occupation:
    webmistress
    Location:
    The Boonies
    I like them too. I have been playing there for a long time. The latest version is really great.
     
  4. Aug 25, 2005
  5. Casinomeister

    Casinomeister Forum Cheermeister Staff Member

    Occupation:
    Homemaker
    Location:
    Bierland
    I've been meaning to list them for quite a while now, and the operator and I just never really got it together to do this since we're both pretty busy. Sometimes I just need a push to get a casino listed here :D
     
  6. Aug 26, 2005
  7. gfkostas

    gfkostas Ex-Bonus Whore

    Occupation:
    IT
    Location:
    UK
    They're good although the absence of telephone support doesn't impress me.
     
  8. Aug 26, 2005
  9. Bruce Hamilton

    Bruce Hamilton Dormant account

    Occupation:
    What's a job?
    Location:
    USA
    Those that do have telephone support aren't overly impressive, either. :rolleyes:
    They sit at computer terminals and recite scripted responses all day long.
     
  10. Aug 28, 2005
  11. esquirexx

    esquirexx Banned User

    Occupation:
    Manager
    Location:
    Istanbul
    webcam was my first live dealer casino.sometimes I continue to play there.
     
  12. Sep 15, 2005
  13. adlai

    adlai Dormant account

    Occupation:
    Attorney
    Location:
    New Jersey, USA
    Glad to See CasinoWebcam made the List

    I thought the your policy was not to accredit Casinos that were unlicensed or unregulated?

    I'm not saying that I have any hard evidence of misfeasance but I am naturally skeptical of Casinos that choose to be based in places like Costa Rica where bribery of government officials is a way of life.

    Yes, they do pay, on the rare occasion that you win and their customer service staff is very responsive and accommodating in rectifying disputes but again, if you know you're going to win it all back anyway, you can afford to be generous.

    I have conducted a series of limited statistical analyses of play there and there is no question that the distribution of cards between 2-6 v. 10-A is skewed. The former appeared approx. 44% of the time and the latter approx. 30% whereas each should be 38.5%. The missing 3% was obviously made up by cards 7-9 which should appear 23% of the time but in fact the % was 26.

    Of course, if this were borne out by a statistical trial of say 10,000 hands or more, the advantage to the House of having more low value cards is obvious. I cannot say that my analyses were extensive enough to prove anything but regualr players will almost without exception tell you that the lower cards predominate.
     

Share This Page